HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Wolf impact remains in dispute


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


DUBOIS -- The growing number of gray wolves and the increasing territory they roam have raised concern from many local hunters and outfitters that wolves are eating into their hunting experience and their business profits.

Wolf advocates argue there's no evidence wolves are chewing through big game populations, calling them a victim of an underlying hostility in the West. Where one side holds the literary legend of the big bad wolf, the other sees the Hollywood icon from "Dances with Wolves."

"It seems to be a more emotional issue, and people seem to be really polarized on it," said Jay Lawson, chief of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department's wildlife division. "The emotions run high on both ends, both pro- and anti-wolf."

The debate comes at a time when the federal government seeks to remove special protection that has allowed the gray wolf to recover from near extinction and turn management of wolves over to Montana, Wyoming and Idaho -- where an estimated 1,545 wolves now live.

It's a debate hindered by a lack of definitive data and knowledge about the interactions between wolves and their chief prey: elk, deer and moose.

In Dubois, a town of about 1,000 where many residents hunt as a way of putting meat on the table, both sides provide mostly anecdotal information to bolster their arguments on whether wolves have affected the local elk herds.

'I blame the wolf'

Budd Betts Jr. runs a guest ranch and hunting guide operation that depends heavily on income from the fall elk hunting season. The ranch is located in a scenic mountain valley outside Dubois where elk roam and wolves are heard howling. He says the area was known for plentiful elk that were easy to hunt.

"That tradition has basically gone away," Betts said. "And for that I blame the wolf. I blame the wolf on the fact that we hardly have any late-season elk hunting anymore."

He acknowledged that other predators and weather affect elk populations but said those conditions existed before the wolf came on the local scene in 1997, and huntable elk populations in the area weren't greatly affected.

'I haven't seen any decrease'

Tory and Meredith Taylor run a pack horse operation outside Dubois in the summer and guide tourists during the winter to see wolves in Yellowstone National Park. They don't see wolves on their property along the Wind River with Whiskey Mountain looming in the distance.

"I'm a hunter, and I believe what my eyes tell me, and I haven't seen any decrease in the number of game animals," Tory Taylor said.

The Taylors noted elk numbers in Wyoming are well above what state wildlife managers consider ideal.

In 2005, Wyoming's elk population was estimated at about 93,500 -- about 12 percent higher than the goal of 83,185, according to a report issued by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department last year.

"The hunting opportunities for big game operators in Wyoming have not decreased. If anything, they've increased," Meredith Taylor said.

They acknowledged instances when wolves were blamed for reducing the size of an elk herd, but said such cases are isolated and a part of nature. They said there's no proof to support the argument that wolves are devastating big game herds on a large scale.

Lack of data

There is a lack of definitive data on how wolves affect elk numbers. Biologists and game managers say it can be hard to determine whether a wolf killed an elk or fed on the animal after it was already dead.

Charles Kay, a Utah researcher who specializes in wildlife ecology, said there have been no comprehensive studies of how wolves affect big game because such a study would be complex, time-consuming and costly.

Ed Bangs, who heads the federal wolf recovery effort in the Northern Rockies, said wolves are "never the primary factor" affecting populations of elk, but can both accelerate declines in an elk herd and slow its the growth.

Separate from the move to delist wolves from the endangered species list, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is considering a rule change that would make it easier for wildlife managers in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho to kill wolves in order to help struggling elk herds.

Wildlife managers in Wyoming, which prodded the federal agency for the change, said it was necessary to preserve healthy big game herds. However, conservationists have opposed the rule change, saying it would lead to too many wolves being killed for eating their natural food source.

"I'm frustrated our own wildlife management agency is so prejudiced against predators," said Franz Camenzind, executive director of the Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance.

All sides agree that wolves are here to stay and the debate over wolves and big game will go on for a long time to come.

"The bottom line is, wolves are here," Wyoming Game and Fish spokesman Eric Keszler said. "I think most reasonable people will say we need to have tools available to manage them in the way that's best for a recovered population of wolves but also best for the people of Wyoming."


Previous   Next
Council: Protect Adobe Town   BLM wraps up horse roundups

Article Rating

Current Rating: 3 of 3 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 5 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Cody Rancher wrote on Nov 29, 2007 11:10 AM:

" Hmmm...interesting comment by the Wyoming Fish and Game spokesman. I though this agency was charged with managing "Fish and Game". I had no idea it was also charged with "...doing what's best for the people of Wyoming." I thought that was solely in the perview of POLITICIANS! "

Teresa45 wrote on Nov 29, 2007 1:24 PM:

" Even as much as Betts is prejudiced against wolves, he does admit that the drought & other factors existed before the wolves began migrating out of Yellowstone. The Taylors know what their eyes tell them: Just as coyotes learned to adapt to living closer to more populated areas, perhaps elk have done the reverse, & moved further from people to avoid being hunted. Charles Kay says a comprehensive study hasn't been done because of cost, complexity, & time issues---yet, Wyoming Game & Fish has a "wolf management" plan they'd love to implement whose budget includes flying time, the amount of fuel required, etc., to hunt & kill wolves by air, especially in the winter months. If that isn't pricey, I don't know what is! Why is it that most people seem to ignore that there are moose herds starving in the Grand Teton area? Drive around any Wyoming town around dawn or dusk, & count the mule deer by the dozens---where are these demonized predator wolves hiding? I've never seen a wolf in the wild, & if Wyoming Game & Fish get to implement their "management" plan, I most likely never will. Everyone concerned with this issue, either for or against the wolves, should educate themselves further by looking at our national park, Isle Royal, on Lake Superior. See what's happened with wolves & moose populations there since the wolves migrated over on an ice bridge in 1949. Let's not see Wyoming make an embarrassing return to misinformed attitudes of a century ago. "

Marion wrote on Nov 30, 2007 5:55 AM:

" I love Bangs statement that wolves are never the primary cause of elk decline, nope it's the fact the bleed to death after being half eaten alive that causes their deaths. And the explanation for the 2/3 decline in the elk herd that is the most preyed upon, the northern Yellowstone herd? Drought, but never explaining how it is the drought only affects the elk in that heavily populated wolf area, not in other areas of the states where there are none to less wolves. Nor how it is with the same drought in RMNP, that their herds are increasing too much. Oh yes, I talked to one couple in Mammoth this fall, who said the ranger told them the reason for so few bulls during the rut was because bulls stay in the mountains for the rut........well maybe there is another explanation for the plunging elk numbers. "

crazy horse wrote on Nov 30, 2007 8:57 AM:

" Well Teresa - try coming up to Northwest WY sometime soon if you really want to see a wolf. Apparently you are PAINFULLY unaware of what is actually occurring and the entire history of the "reintroduction". First of all, G&F wouldn't love to implement anything - they didn't ask FWS to bring in wolves. Their management plan is tailored to match the original population objectives set by FWS. Wolf populations are over three times objective per the ESA goals. Furthermore, USDA WS currently is aerial gunning wolves by the score. If you want to see a wolf perhaps you could hitch a ride in their helicopter sometime. If the wolves are hiding they are probably hiding from that helicopter, and from the amount of wolves they are shooting the wolves apparently aren't doing a very good job. Please educate yourself! "

Tguide wrote on Dec 5, 2007 10:12 AM:

" Meredith Taylor is an anti hunter. Their "pack operation" is a non-hunting operation. Here the CST quotes total numbers of elk, and people fail to realize this is for the whole state! Not from the NW part where we have our impact from wolves! I assure you MEREDITH that wolves are impacting our "operations", you fail miserably to comprehend this. You and Tory are want-a-be outfitters. And I'd like to know where "Tory" hunts sooooooo....hard, that he doesn't see a change in game numbers! "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.