HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Panel approves coal-to-liquids plant permit


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


SARATOGA -- A massive coal-to-liquids plant planned for Carbon County cleared a major hurdle last week.

DKRW Advanced Fuels’ Medicine Bow Fuel and Power project was granted an industrial siting permit after an all-day hearing here.

The permit from the state Industrial Siting Council was granted after the company announced two major modifications in the project.

The timeline for the start of the $2 billion project located between Medicine Bow and Elk Mountain has been pushed back one year, and the finished product of the coal-to-liquids plant has been switched from diesel to gasoline.

The start date of the project, originally projected for the spring of 2008, “has slipped to the second quarter of 2009 due to weather concerns,” said Jude Rolfes, senior vice president of engineering, construction and asset management for DKRW Advanced Fuels. The final permitting is also expected to be delayed until winter of 2008.

Site work for the plant is now planned to begin in the second quarter of 2008 by a local contractor, Rolfes said.

As for the change in the finished product from diesel to “low-sulfur gasoline," Rolfes said, “The diesel plant was not ready and the gasoline plant was."

Asked by council member Sandy Shuptrine about the market for low-sulfur gasoline, Rolfes responded, “Yes, there is a market. It can be used in your car (as produced) or it can be blended with other gasolines."

The board was also concerned with carbon dioxide emissions from the process of turning coal into liquid fuels.

“We plan to send the CO2 to northeast Wyoming for use in the enhanced oil recovery projects that are already occurring there,” Rolfes said. “There is a strong market for it.”

Under questioning from the board and Department of Environmental Quality Industrial Siting Division spokesman Tom Schroeder, the applicant agreed to provide housing at the plant site for up to 500 workers during the construction period. The site will have the capacity to expand to accommodate up to 1,000 people if needed, and the company will continue to work with the surrounding communities to find housing for the construction work force that is expected to peak at 2,300.

In addition to the company and the state DEQ Industrial Siting Division, nine other parties registered to participate in Thursday’s hearing.

According to Kate Perez, director of communications and public relations for DKRW, “This permit was a big one, but there are several more to get. The next big one is the air quality permit from the Wyoming DEQ, which we expect to get early next year.”


Previous   Next
Sleds hit park limits   Council says 'no' to facade

Article Rating

Current Rating: 3 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 3 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Cool wrote on Dec 9, 2007 3:46 PM:

" Someone is actually doing something?.......Isn't it great.....................I can hear the noise now from the enviros' private planes swooping in to object. Something that makes sense is sure to cause a great dilemma. May those with any say be able to expedite the project and keep it on track with great hope there are many more to come.............................. "

Chemical Engineer wrote on Dec 12, 2007 1:22 PM:

" An innovative project like this will have a lot of nay-sayers. Most people are used to the traditional refining way of producing gasoline and guzzling it up in thieir big vehicles. They cannot fathom how CLEAN gasoline can be generated from coal. government help and some progressive financing can make this project happen and there will be more once this happens (I HOPE). WE NEED TO DIVERSIFY OUR SOURCE OF ENERGY AND BE LESS DEPENDENT ON MIDDLE EAST "

DJ wrote on Dec 23, 2007 10:59 AM:

" I am all for this project, just what the Doc ordered even though I drive a big vehicle, instead of a tin can(if I have a wreck I have a better chance at living). I know i paid the price, Injuries of driving a tin can. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.