HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Coyote bites two in park


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


A coyote in Yellowstone National Park was shot and killed after biting two people near Old Faithful just before Christmas.

The young, scrawny female coyote stole a woman's pack in front on the Old Faithful Snow Lodge on Dec. 23, Colin Campbell, a deputy superintendent at Yellowstone, said Monday. Her family got the pack back and threw snowballs at the coyote to try to scare it away. The coyote, though, doubled back and bit the woman on the ankle, puncturing the skin and leaving scrapes on her foot, and then left, Campbell said.

Rangers soon learned that a Yellowstone Association employee skiing was bitten on the lower leg by the same coyote. She whacked it with a ski pole, but the coyote only went a short distance away.

The two incidents happened 10 to 15 minutes apart.

"Its behavior was not at all normal," Campbell said.

A park ranger and a maintenance worker lost sight of the coyote but tracked it to an area where it could be safely shot with a handgun. Its body was taken to the Montana Department of Livestock's veterinary lab, where technicians expedited tests for rabies on Christmas Eve. The results were negative.

"Both victims were greatly relieved to hear that," Campbell said.

There was no food in the pack that the coyote took and no indication that it had been in trouble before, Campbell said.

When an animal attacks a person, Campbell said, "we just can't tolerate that."


Previous   Next
Glenrock hopes to cash in on new mascot   Groups rap park threats report

Article Rating

Current Rating: 3 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 4 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Wy_oldtimer wrote on Jan 1, 2008 3:49 PM:

" Good thing it was a Coyote and not a wolf. Can you imagine the “Donnybrook” that this incident would start? This thread woul go a hundred eplies at least. But let me be the Devil’s advocate on this one and placate a few Easterners, more than a handful of environmentalists and nearly 100 percent of PETA

Why didn’t they use a tranquilizer dart to immobilize is this poor starving animal. It's obvious it only stole the back pack searching for food and no doubt bit the snow skier because she was encroaching on the coyotes territory

Perhaps given time and a little help from the dog whisperer on the National Geographic Channel this coyote could have been reeducated and perhaps even been released or should I say reintroduced in Central Park in New York City.

On the serious side I do hope that the Star Tribune will have a follow-up article if anyone from the National Park Service or the National Wildlife Agency has a realistic explanation for the coyotes behavior especially since it was not a carrier of rabies. The Animals behavior was strange to say the least. I am most curious to hear a “real” expert weigh in on this.
"

Cody wrote on Jan 1, 2008 4:35 PM:

" When will people learn that wild animals are not pets? "

Troy wrote on Jan 2, 2008 10:03 PM:

" Its too bad they had to shot the Coyote, with all of the technology we have nowdays why don't they tranqualize the animal and do some tests on it then, if it passes with no rabbies. Relocate the animal away from people. "

Chrys wrote on Feb 2, 2008 10:28 PM:

" Yeah! relocation for wild animal that obviously was not afraid of humans will more than likely go back to where human beings reside and keep causing problems. Besides now wolves might become trophy and predatory animals so happy hunting. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.