HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Will the 'domino' fall?

A snowmobiler tops a hill in the Wyoming Range in the western part of the state. The future of oil and gas development in the range remains unsettled. Photo by MARK GOCKE, Star-Tribune correspondent.

Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


LANDER -- A diverse and ostensibly powerful alliance of organizations and elected officials has been opposing new oil and gas drilling projects in the Wyoming Range for about three years.

It's unclear what the campaign has yielded, if anything.

Those who have joined to protect the mountain range in the western part of the state are an eclectic group of people and organizations, including Democratic Gov. Dave Freudenthal, Republican U.S. Sen. John Barrasso, Sportsmen for the Wyoming Range, the Wilderness Society, the National Outdoor Leadership School, miners, ranchers, outfitters, hunters and even some gas patch workers.

A bill to protect the range, introduced by Barrasso five months ago, would stop the sale of any future leases there, and allow for negotiated buyouts -- and the subsequent permanent retirement of existing leases. But the bill has languished in the Senate, and is still waiting for its first hearing in a subcommittee.

Meanwhile, in what Freudenthal has characterized as "the first domino" toward industrialization of the Wyoming Range, Plains Exploration and Production Co. is moving forward with plans for a 17-pad, 136-well development of legally valid gas leases it owns in the Upper Hoback River Basin, just south of Bondurant.

And 44,700 acres of Wyoming Range land, originally leased for energy development in 2005 and 2006 -- which have been in limbo since just after the sales -- are potentially on track for drilling. The U.S. Forest Service has initiated a new analysis of the potential environmental impact of drilling, and if it reaches the same conclusion it did in its previous analysis, development of the leases would be lawful.

Now, Denver-based Stanley Energy Inc., which owns about half of the contested leases, has proposed a 181-well development program on over 20,000 acres just south of the Plains leases, on the eastern slope of the Wyoming Range.


Previous   Next
Bills target traffic safety   Plan cuts most land agency budgets

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 6 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

BULL wrote on Feb 5, 2008 9:28 AM:

" I agree some areas , like the Wyoming Range should be protected from development. But lets include ALL development . Not just oil & gas interests. There are certain people who just want it all for themselves. Lets just designate all mountain areas in Wyoming as wilderness areas then it will keep out the greenies also. Unless the want to ride thier fancy horses or walk. "

BELLSTOWN wrote on Feb 5, 2008 10:58 AM:

" The greenies will walk, the hunters will ride their ATVs, the rednecks will ride their snowmobiles. The Wyoming Range should still be accessible to everyone, as it is right now. We just shouldn't drill and dig, no oil wells, no new structures, but wilderness goes a little too far... "

Ken wrote on Feb 5, 2008 1:00 PM:

" This is one small part of the issue. This energy boom - drilling in the southwest, coal and coalbed methane in the northeast, wind in the southeast and new transmission lines all over the place - has the potential to destroy what all of us value about the state. The energy jobs will come and go, we'll feel rich for awhile, small-town kids will still leave for better jobs elsewhere and the economy will remain the least diverse in the US. After the energy-industrialization is finished, not even the wealth second-homers will come. Let's face it - the state is a sacrifice zone for the energy needs of the rest of the country. And we have no one to blame but ourselves. "

BULL wrote on Feb 5, 2008 4:07 PM:

" Oh , I see , BELLSTOWN, you would like to see things done YOUR way. Do you live in a cave and rub sticks to keep warm ? If not then you are using some sort of gas & oil. If you people understood how the oil & gas business worked , or had an interest in any of it , you might not all be so stupid about things like that. "

BELLSTOWN wrote on Feb 6, 2008 12:05 PM:

" I see how the gas and oil industry worked for us for the last hundred years, which is NOT. Few got rich, and the majority got addicted to oil and gas. Instead of spending billions on a fruitless war, we should have invested into alternative energies, now the USA is behind in technological developments in that sector. Oil and gas are a finite resource, whether we get it from Wyoming or the Middle East. Our addiction to energy is not going to change drastically anytime soon, so we got to find cheaper, safer and sustainable ways to get that energy. I don't live in a cave, and I'm currently heating my house mainly with wood, that was already cut and stashed on my property. It's not ideal, but I'm planning a solar and ground coil heated house. I'm looking forward to a new president who will hopefully encourage mine and other future-minded persons' efforts with tax breaks and investments. So in 10 years from now, when we're out of oil and can't buy any from the Middle East, because we're too broke to afford it, you can then live in the cave and rub sticks, while I will live in an energy independent house. "

BULL wrote on Feb 7, 2008 10:32 AM:

" Did you cut that wood using a crosscut saw , Bellstown ? Did you send your comments to the CST via carrier pigeon ? Do you walk or ride a horse everywhere ? I didnt think so. All those things are the results of oil & gas in some way or another. BTW , Amerika is already broke because of the current idiots in the White House and thier " fuzzy math ". "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.