HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

'Discipline and diligence'


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


CHEYENNE -- The mood in Cheyenne is somewhat subdued as Wyoming lawmakers gather for the legislative budget session that kicks off Monday.

State budget gurus are projecting essentially flat revenues over the next two years. Meanwhile, the basic cost of state government has climbed sharply during the last several years of the ongoing energy boom.

"Once we fund those things that we've funded for the last several budgets at or about the same level, we don't have the dramatic amount of money to spend on legislative initiatives," said House Speaker Roy Cohee, R-Casper.

Cohee said it appears legislators will have between $35 million and $55 million to spend on individual projects this year. While that may sound like a lot, it's actually not much wiggle room in a two-year state budget totaling about $7.7 billion, including federal funds.

"The Legislature, for the first time in several budget sessions, is going to have to exercise discipline and diligence, and prioritize its spending," Cohee said.

The Joint Appropriations Committee held weeks of hearings on Gov. Dave Freudenthal's proposed budget recommendations last month.

Rep. Jane Warren, D-Laramie and a committee member, said lawmakers have already submitted bills seeking far more than the $50 million available.

Warren said national trends such as greater interest in renewable energy and a growing concern about the environmental effects of coal could affect the state's long-term financial picture.

"It doesn't mean we're going to go into a deficit; I don't think we will," Warren said. "But I don't think the rate of growth is going to be the same as it was before."

While other states around the country have faced tough decisions about trimming deficits and raising taxes, debates at the Wyoming State Capitol over the past few years have boiled down to what to do with the energy dollars cascading into state coffers. The basic question has been "save or spend?" And the state has done both.

Mike McVay, director of the state Department of Administration and Information, has tracked the growth in the recurring cost of state government programs.

Discounting one-time expenditures, such as capital construction projects and extraordinary agency requests, McVay said the recurring cost of state government was roughly $2.4 billion for the 2005-06 biennium. He said that rose to $2.6 billion for the two-year budget cycle that ends this summer. And he said it will rise again to an estimated $2.9 billion for the coming two-year budget cycle.

Meanwhile, the state's Consensus Revenue Estimating Group -- a panel of state financial experts -- last month predicted a decrease in the state's income from $4.3 billion in the current two-year fiscal cycle to $3.6 billion for the coming 2009-10 period. That drop may seem exaggerated, however, because the state had just over $1 billion in its budget reserve account two years ago compared to just over $280 million currently.

Buck McVeigh, administrator at the state's Economic Analysis Division, is co-chairman of CREG. McVeigh said lawmakers are getting the message that Wyoming's financial picture is changing.

"I think the legislators are well abreast of the situation, where we don't have the big cash surpluses we had several years ago sitting around," McVeigh said. "Budgets have gotten to be such that maintaining the current level of spending requires a great deal more revenue, so we don't see the kind of surpluses that we did in the early stages of this gas boom."

Rep. Colin Simpson, R-Cody, is House majority floor leader. As such, he serves as a gatekeeper, controlling which bills receive time for debate and which wither and die.

"It does require a more conservative mind-set going into this next biennium budget, I do believe," Simpson said of Wyoming's current financial picture.

Simpson said lawmakers need to take a long-term perspective and consider the state's infrastructure needs. He said they must make sure Wyoming "is prepared for the growth that I think is inevitably coming, and to continue to try to be aware of ongoing expenditures versus one-time expenditures."

Sen. President John Schiffer, R-Kaycee, said Wyoming still has enough money to pay for government services, but "it's not as much as we've had for the past two bienniums.

"We've gotten used to spending a lot of money, because we've had a lot of money," Schiffer said.


Previous   Next
Feds plan grouse study   The Whole Town's Talking: Million-dollar mice receive VIP treatment

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 1 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Dollars Man wrote on Feb 10, 2008 2:06 PM:

" I do not think the people of Wyoming are getting the big picture here. The legisalture gave every one a tax cut last year by dropping the sales tax on food. Now the people want to cut property taxes, next.
As the people want to cut the funding sources for local communties, which is being done by the legislature, with out putting the funding back in place from other sources.

The local municipalities will be forced to charge higher water, sewer, garbage, and utility rates. To make up the difference in revenue lost. How's that tax abolishment and cut looking now.

Thus the legislators avoid any claim to being held accountable for their actions and letting the local politicians take on the chin.

With this ill concieved representation by our legislature, I propose that we abolish all local municipalities and county governments and let the legislature run the whole thing, since they want to controll all the dollars and tell them how and what to spend it on. Let them put up with the calls and complaints for the voters in the communities and counties. Then they might have a different perspective on what is going on in the state. Instead of that time warp they put themselves in when they get to Cheyenne. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.