HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Group plans to sue feds over elk-killing plan


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular




A wolf-advocacy group said it will sue Rocky Mountain National Park over its decision to hire sharpshooters to kill up to 200 elk a year at the park as a way to handle overpopulation.

The decision to use the sharpshooters was made in December but signed Friday by Mike Snyder, intermountain director for the National Park Service.

A WildEarth Guardians officer said Monday that federal officials didn't take a fair look at introducing wolves to the park as an alternate way to keep the elk population down.

Elk -- there are an estimated 2,000 in the park -- are destroying aspen and willows in large stretches on the eastern part of the Continental Divide, threatening to decimate large areas of the riverbank ecosystem.

The Park Service says shooting elk will be part of a plan that also includes fences, restoring trees and redistributing the elk.

But Rob Edward, director for carnivore recovery for the Santa Fe, N.M.-based WildEarth Guardians, said 30 or 40 wolves could accomplish the same goals in a more natural way.

The National Park Service plan also calls for testing live elk for chronic wasting disease.

In the first year, up to 120 female elk would be captured, be tested for the disease and be given a fertility-control treatment. Biologists hope they'll learn new and better ways to deal with CWD by testing the female elk.

Any elk that tested positive for CWD -- a relative to "mad cow" disease -- would be killed and removed.

The final plan "balances the most important management issues with the many differing viewpoints expressed," said Park Service Superintendent Vaughn Baker. It will be the guideline for managing elk for the next 20 years.


Previous   Next
Extra spending money: What will you do with your tax rebate?   Update: Prosecutors charge kidnapping suspect

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 4 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

crazy horse wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:09 PM:

" Yes YES YEEESSSSSS!!!!!! - we would be more than happy to give some wolves to Colorado or any other place that thinks they need or want some (don't feel shy all you Easterners). Then when the elk population gets too low and the wolf population is out of control, they can hire sharpshooters to come shoot the wolves, as they have done here in WY. I LOVE the concept - LOVE IT. Of course the wolves will need to stay in the park, not harass pets or livestock, and generally behave lol omg rofl. Supposing this fails, where do I apply for a "sharpshooter" position? Ha ha ha ha ha ha. "

F Smith wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:57 PM:

" Why not have a lottery for additional Elk tags just for the area concerned? This would control numbers and bring in added revenue while also using the resource to feed honest people. Can we do nothing the smart way here? If you want this to be supervised as it is in the park, require that the hunters contract with local guides for the hunt that are certified to hunt in the park or that they do so under park employee supervision. "

WW wrote on Feb 19, 2008 5:33 PM:

" 30 or 40 wolves! Do you really think they will live with this? H=== no they won't! They'll want 100 or 200, then threaten to sue again if anyone wants to control numbers when they eventually eat the numbers down to where there will be strong competition amoung packs! Get real! Wildearth guardians are paper biologist with an extremist agenda and nothing else! Probably funded by PETA or the Human Society, or some other group that hates hunting! The Park service should just do it's thing and to H--- with WEG! "

RK wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:27 PM:

" I agree with F Smith 100%.
But thank god for our goverment! They being all knowing can spend more of our Tax dollars. Hire sharpshooters to do what a hunter would gladly pay to do.
Thanks for looking out for our best interest here. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.