HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Group: Revoke plant's permit


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


GLENROCK -- Long plagued by assorted delays, North American Power Group’s Two Elk Power Plant project is now facing several lawsuits aimed at halting its progress.

The Sierra Club is asking the state Department of Environmental Quality’s Industrial Siting Council to revoke a construction permit issued to Two Elk in 1997, and extended twice since then. The permit is “based on stale information and is woefully out of date,” according to the petition.

The Sierra Club also has legal actions pending before the Environmental Quality Council and in state District Court in Cheyenne concerning air pollution, Laramie-based Sierra Club attorney Reed Zars said.

Industrial Siting Division Administrator Todd Parfitt alerted the council it will need to meet within 60 days to decide whether to hold a formal case hearing on the Sierra Club petition.

Brad Enzi, vice president of government affairs for North American, updated the Industrial Siting Council on the Two Elk project at the council’s meeting Tuesday in Glenrock. The 325-megawatt, air-cooled power plant would use “waste” coal available at several Powder River Basin coal mines to generate power.

He was questioned by concerned council members who want to see some forward movement with the project, which has proven slow to get off the ground in the 10 years since its announcement.

“Obviously there is much reason for concern about the progress of Two Elk,” council member Sandy Shuptrine said. “It is a serious concern -- the construction schedule, the holding of revenue bonds, and the important question of emissions.”

So far, North American has spent “in excess of $65 million,” Enzi told the council. When announced in the late 1990s, the project price tag was $300 million. Two years ago, that figure had increased to $550 million. Today, Enzi said, the total is greater than $750 million, in large part due to the rapid development of coal-based power plants in foreign countries.

He estimated Two Elk will require another $300 million to $400 million in financing beyond what has been acquired so far through the sale of industrial revenue bonds.

Largely, the financial backing for Two Elk came from state-issued industrial revenue bonds, recommended by the Campbell County Commission and authorized by Gov. Dave Freudenthal. With more than $450 million in bonds issued over the past six years, Enzi said North American is within “a few tens of millions” of federal maximums for revenue bonds.

At the Two Elk site near Wright, crews are finishing road work. Scrapers will start leveling a foundation for the plant and will move dirt through the summer, Enzi told the council. The plant should be fired up in late 2011, would be ready for commercial operations in 2012.

Meanwhile, North American has secured a large generator interconnect agreement with PacifiCorp, signed in September. That allows Two Elk to feed power into the utility’s transmission network.

Council member Jim Miller asked who owns North American, a privately held company. He expressed concern with the principals’ leap to a project a “ten-fold step up in size” of previous work.

“It’s a big, dark cave on who NAPG is. We’d like to know,” Miller said.

Enzi declined to publicly disclose who the principals are.


Previous   Next
EPA raps Anticline plan   State gets Obama calls complaint

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 2 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

TR wrote on Feb 21, 2008 8:30 AM:

" I wonder if the phonies in the Sierra Club like to use electricity. Maybe they all just use carrier pigeons instead of computers. Hypocrits. "

Common Cents wrote on Feb 22, 2008 11:21 PM:

" Hey, TR - we've got plenty of electricity for Wyoming - and its computers - already. All this new development is for Colorado, Arizona, etc. Have you seen the web of transmission lines we're going to get?

How 'bout letting the rest of the country generate its own power for a change,while we build a sustainable, diversified economy to replace our current power-company feudalism. Sierra Club is incidental to this issue. It's nice that they want to carry the cost of litigation - if they didn't, we'd need to find someone else to set up that reality check.

And don't'cha love it that Enzi declines to tell us who're the NAPG principals? Once again, we all lie down and say "kick me" to whatever bunch of energy-project promoters comes to town. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.