HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Judge raps guns in national parks


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


The criminal killing of an elk underscores the need to restrict the use of loaded guns in national parks, Chief U.S. District Judge William Downes said Tuesday.

"You took a magnificent bull elk in a United States park, then engaged in acts to cover up your crime," Downes said before sentencing Michael David Belderrain to four years in prison.

"Your case represents a classic public policy answer to the question: 'Why do we not want to have people with indiscriminate access to firearms in a national park?'

"And your crime answers that question," he said. "We don't."

Downes' comment at Belderrain's sentencing hearing in Casper coincides with a growing national debate about the U.S. Department of Interior's proposed review of a ban on loaded guns in national parks and lands administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Supporters have said the ban on loaded guns in national parks infringes on their Second Amendment rights and their ability to defend themselves from human and animal predators. Opponents, including conservation groups and park rangers, have said the ban has made national parks among the safest places in America.

The ban didn't stop Belderrain.

On Dec. 14, 2005, he killed an elk standing in Gallatin County, Mont., just outside the Yellowstone National Park boundary, decapitated it, and dragged the head to his truck inside the park, he said when he changed his plea on Aug. 22.

He could have faced a sentence of between 30 months and 57 months in prison.

On Tuesday, Belderrain's federal public defender, Daniel Blythe, described his client as a person who lived a little on the edge and was impulsive.

On the day of the crime, Blythe said, Belderrain saw the elk walking and he described it as "a beautiful, wonderful elk."

Downes interrupted, saying, "one of the most notable specimens in North America in recent years."

Blythe continued, saying his client acted impulsively when he shot the animal.

Belderrain has a good family, works in a mine and has a good work ethic, Blythe said.

Before Downes imposed the sentence, Belderrain gave a tearful apology as he admitted he deprived others of viewing the elk.

"I do love hunting," he said. "That elk, I did take away from the people. I seen it and I shot it."

Belderrain, 36, has donated more than $50,000 to the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation because he wanted to make sure his children have the same privileges he did, he said.

He finally asked for leniency.

Assistant U.S. Attorney John Barksdale, arguing for a stiffer sentence, told Downes the defendant was prohibited from possessing guns and had committed other crimes, including aggravated assault in Sanders County, Mont., in 1999.

The image of Belderrain as impulsive and on the edge did not excuse his behavior, Barksdale said. "He's stepped over the line one too many times."

Downes then imposed the sentence.

After referring to Belderrain's actions as a reason to keep loaded weapons out of national parks, Downes recounted previous, lightly punished criminal behavior such as operating an outfitting business outside the law, alcohol-related crimes, and game and hunting violations.

That history persuaded him to levy a stiff punishment for the current counts, he said.

A light sentence would send the wrong message to prospective offenders that the courts would tolerate committing crimes in a national park in the district of Wyoming, he said.

"You thought you were above the law," Downes said. "This sentence will emphatically teach you (that) you are not above the law."

Besides the 48 months for being a felon in possession of a firearm, and 12 months for the two game violations -- all to be served concurrently -- Downes ordered Belderrain to pay $6,000 in restitution to the Yellowstone National Park Service Restitution Fund, plus a $1,000 fine.

Belderrain has 10 days to file an appeal, and will be able to be on supervised release during the appeal, and for three years after the prison term, Downes said.

Conditions of supervised release include committing no other crimes, not using alcohol or other drugs, not possessing guns, seeking anger management and mental health counseling, and staying out of national parks, he said.

After the sentencing, Blythe said he intends to file an appeal with the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver on a double-jeopardy issue because Belderrain already had pleaded guilty to the same charges in Montana.

Reach Tom Morton at (307) 266-0592, or at Tom.Morton@trib.com.


Previous   Next
Groups question health care bill   Senate kills methane water bill

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 2 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 33 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

RLA wrote on Feb 27, 2008 7:13 AM:

" Hooray for the judge. He makes a good point to keep firearms out of the paork, especially rifles. I don't have a prblem with handguns in the park, but you will have the occasional idiot who has to take a .454 casull to poach with. To bad this judge didn't preside over Vorhees who poached the big horn sheep on the north fork and to this day never gave up his hunting. "

TR wrote on Feb 27, 2008 8:11 AM:

" Correction, restrict loaded guns in the parks by " idiots " , not normal folks. There are lots of idiots anymore , so there shouldnt be many guns in the Parks. "

Lamp Lighter wrote on Feb 27, 2008 9:51 AM:

" A chance is never missed to blame firearms. Obviously there were laws in place to prevent this. Did the existing laws prevent it. I believe the correct answer is no! So why does more laws or rules equal compliance by someone in the future. This is a case of taking a stupid mistake and twisting it to accomodate personal agendas. I believe we have had animals killed inside the park in the past when firearms were also restricted. More freedom equates to less problems. Guns should be allowed in all parks. More restrictions will only mean more infractions not less, I'm disappointed this judge couldn't refrain from his personal indulgences "

JRT wrote on Feb 27, 2008 10:15 AM:

" Why not make driving a car in a national park illegal because someone might do it while they are drunk? Let's not punish the law abiding citizens by preventing them from carrying a gun. If they use it illegally, then punish them. "

MV wrote on Feb 27, 2008 4:00 PM:

" Has anyone noticed that the "idiots" with guns could care less whether they are allowed to have them or not? Restricting carrying firearms into a national park will not stop the "idiots" from doing so. "

BELLSTOWN wrote on Feb 27, 2008 4:29 PM:

" LL you say: "More restrictions will only mean more infractions not less." So, you want to legalize everything, including murder, because then there would be no infractions at all? I think that's called anarchy! BTW, the judge and parks don't want MORE restrictions, they just want the keep the laws in place that are existing right now. And the NRA itself said: "No new gun laws!" "

Lamp Lighter wrote on Feb 27, 2008 7:09 PM:

" Hello BELLSTOWN....... I apologize to everyone for my posting so often. I will try to refrain from doing so....Bellstown I resent you attempting to put negative phrases in my mouth. Please allow my words to speak for themselves although they don't roll out quite as you would like. And I will try not to speak for you. I believe you understand very well the intent of my point(s) I consider the judges recomendation to recind the Feds consideration of lifting the firearm ban tantamount to making the regs.........Laws do not equate to compliance........Laws or regs. can only make law breakers. Give honest people their freedom and they will not only be compliant they will see to it you are also. I will feel much more secure when everyone packs a firearm everywhere....Well maybe not everone maybe not those that suggest I advocate murder. "

Tim Wolf wrote on Feb 27, 2008 7:22 PM:

" This is EXACTLY the message that needs to be sent to poachers and the other losers who think the 2nd Amendment gives them the right to bear arms anywhere they want to go. Firearms so easily accessible have NO BUSINESS ANYWHERE IN A NATIONAL PARK. Now, if that poacher who shot the mountain lion kittens, and the 2 losers who poached the mule deer in Pinedale, and the oil patch trash who ran down the antelope off the Jonah 500 will all get pen time and fines like this, then I think the message will get out that this state takes its wildlife and hunting privledges seriously. Good Job Judge Downes! "

Park Neighbor wrote on Feb 28, 2008 7:15 AM:

" What nonsense! It is ILLEGAL right now to bring a gun into the park. This offender and nearly all others are going to break the law if there is a law or not. Quit preaching and taking away the rights of law abiding citizens. We are starting to look a lot like the Communists where the citizens have no rights. "

BULL wrote on Feb 28, 2008 9:51 AM:

" " OIL PATCH TRASH " ? SOME OF US TAKE EXCEPTION TO YOUR PATHETIC STATEMENT , TIM WOLF. IF IT WERE NOT FOR " OIL PATCH TRASH " YOU SURE WOULDNT HAVE GAS OR DIESEL FOR YOUR VEHICLE OR GASTO HEAT YOUR HOME WITH. WE ARE NOT ALL " OIL FIELD TRASH " , JUST AS WE ARE NOT ALL DRUNKEN DRIVERS OR POTHEADS. "

MT wrote on Feb 28, 2008 1:02 PM:

" LL: Laws do equal compliance. That's why laws are in place. This guy broke the law, and he is going to pay for it. It's simple. "

DanW wrote on Feb 29, 2008 2:44 AM:

" Yeah, OIL PATCH TRASH!!!!
I work in the industry, and will tell you point blank that there's PLENTY of TRASH out in the patch. Sure, there's still lots of decent hard working guys, keeping up and maintaining a proud tradition of roughnecking. Unfortunately they're becoming fewer and fewer every year. Roughnecking is rapidly changing from an honorable profession and blue collar career, to the best job a guy can get straight out of prison.
"

Tim W. wrote on Feb 29, 2008 5:52 AM:

" Hey Bull, 10 times more of you are meth heads and drunk drivers and wife beaters and poachers than aren't. That's a simple fact easily proven by the incredible spike in those crime statistics since the boom began. Keep in mind that these are only the people who have been caught - so far - but the losers who poached the mule deer in Pinedale work in the patch. The loser who ran down the antelope and then posted pictures of it on the web was patch trash. And the "doctor" who poached the mountain lions and then tried to lie his way out of it may very well be right up there working floors with you after his well deserved sentence to the pen has been served.
It's time you oil field people came to grips with the fact that Wyoming was doing better before you got here, and we'll be just fine long after you're gone. The only thing you're providing this state right now is a little extra money in the state's bank. Money that we'll be getting anyway. That's all. Maybe people would appreciate you more if y'all didn't act like you were indespensible. "

CG wrote on Feb 29, 2008 9:11 PM:

" Poaching is illegal already and so is carrying a gun in a natl park. So why not let law abiding citizens carry a gun in a Natl Park to defend themselves. People who want to poach or even rob someone will do it whether it is illegal or not. So why can't I carry a gun in a natl park to protect my self and my family? "

steve wrote on Mar 1, 2008 5:27 AM:

" I thought that judges are supposed to rule on the laws, not their opinions. "

PEACEinPARKS wrote on Mar 1, 2008 6:46 AM:

" If you don't want loaded guns in national parks, use the following link to send an e-mail saying so to your reps. in Washington.

http://ga1.org/campaign/Coburn_Amendment?qp_source=adv%5fhme "

Tim Wolf wrote on Mar 1, 2008 5:00 PM:

" Thanks PEACEinPARKS for the link, but there's no way Wyoming's current Congressional delegation will respect the will of the people. Not when there's big money to be made at the behest of the special interest groups out to bend this state over. We all know that. "

GrayFox wrote on Mar 1, 2008 6:08 PM:

" Criminals, be they murderers, rapists, robbers or poachers, by definition, break the law. CG hit the nail on the head. "

Yellowstone wrote on Mar 2, 2008 4:09 PM:

" This could not have happened. Somebody is sadly mistaken. It is against the law to have a loaded gun in a national park. There are laws to prevent this type of thing happening....what's that you say? Oh, nevermind. "

highmarkin wrote on Mar 3, 2008 9:02 AM:

" Old Timmy at it again?Mr.Sterotype.Just to let everyone know only Timmy is living right.You know Tim I have never heard you state how you make a living on any occasion.You are constantly attacking(BY STEREOTYPING)of course anyone who is not just like you.From wolves to someones occupation your constantly on the attack.You people can support all the laws you want but until you realize real criminals really don't care what laws you pass no of this is going to do anything.The problem is with the liberal mindset this country has turned to.Maybe people need to start pushing our elected officials to quit letting criminals get hand slaps,probation and get out of jail free cards.I am tired of paying for non rehabilited people and prisoners because someone feels sorry for them.Well BOO HOO.They had the choice to do something different with their lives.Your right Tim there is lot's of trash out there but it's not just an oilfield thing as you imply.We all heard about the Dr.and his total lack of appreciation for wildlife ,so are all Dr's that way Timmy?As far as your concerned they are.So I guess we all need to live perfectly just like ol' Timmy and then we can cast the same stones. "

Tyler wrote on Mar 3, 2008 10:04 AM:

" When and where guns are banned only the criminals have them. This has been proven time and time again in England, Japan and elsewhere.

Following those facts, by definition insanity is repeating the same process and expecting a different outcome.

Hence, we should not follow other failed models (the same can be said of economics, politics) in this country.

The NRA is not a group of thugs. The NRA is all of us citizens that are its law abiding membership. We elect the board of directors and we set the agenda. We are your neighbors, friends and fellow citizens. Just because your interests and ideas differ from mine is no reason to demonize me or my values. Remember liberals; different does not mean bad, it only means different (this concept can and should be applied to race, creed, color, national origin, gender or values). Please try to live up to your parties core values of inclusiveness, open mindedness and not being judgemental (those are the things that democrats and all liberals claim to be arn't they?).
"

Larry Daniels wrote on Mar 3, 2008 1:20 PM:

" Another moron judge that thinks punishing the gun instead of the person is the way to go! If the court system would ever do anything serious to those idiots who kill people, they wouldn't have to blame guns so much. I agree long rifles do not belong in the park. However, responsible people should not be punished the same as offenders. Punish the person, not the gun. I have yet to see a gun that could think or pull its's trigger by itself. "

Tim wrote on Mar 4, 2008 5:53 AM:

" Hey Larry Daniels, you're absolutely right. That darn gun should have gotten four years in the pen, not the poor sap who pulled the trigger. Lord knows the darn gun talked him into shooting that elk. Guns are sure persuasive that way. If only that darn gun hadn't been there in the first place, right? And gosh, highmarkin, what does my occupation have to do with anything? Do you want something new to whine about? Just be content knowing that I've been through a couple of these booms and busts here in Wyoming and am one of the people born here and stayed here to pick up the pieces when the great invasions moved on to chase a buck somewhere else. "

Tguide wrote on Mar 5, 2008 9:45 AM:

" Hey Tim I'll protect you! "

Larry D wrote on Mar 5, 2008 2:31 PM:

" I am writing these comments now that I have had more time to give the topic more rational consideration. In the first place, I pray that the judge will forgive me for calling him a moron. I trust he is a just and honorable man who is just being hopeful. I realize the person that shot the elk has been punished but trying to ban guns in the park is not going to solve this kind of problem. I agree that I do not want long rifles in Yellowstone or people packing pistols on their hips. To begin with, a law to ban guns, as everyone knows, is just another ineffectual law unless you can enforce it. How are you going to enforce it? Search everyone and their vehicles when they enter the park? I do not blame anyone for carrying a pistol in their vehicle or in their camper for protection, just not in open view. Maybe most of the people will obey this law but if someone wants to take a gun into Yellowstone, for any reason, they are going to. The killing of the elk was inexcusable but attempting to put a ban on taking guns into Yellowstone, in my opinion is impossible. "

Regan wrote on Mar 21, 2008 11:10 AM:

" Mike is a friend of mine and he has a felony charge and he is unable to use a firearm and i have a very good relationship with him and his family and i have gone gopher hunting with them and mike used a firearm i dont know if that applys to his felony charge but i thought that it would help a little bit "

Bowhunter wrote on May 30, 2008 11:18 AM:

" I'm bringing my LOADED BOW to YS.
LOL - I'll have a gun or two as well.

"Two kinds of people in this world; those that dig and those w/ Guns!!" Ahhh, Clint. The Good, The Bad and the Ugly. FYI - Clint was, "The Good" "

Bill wrote on Jun 8, 2008 7:40 PM:

" Belderain has been a trouble maker since he was a kid. This whole episode will do nothing to change his character, but a stiff prosecution, with hard penalties will make it difficult for him to get away with other crimes later on. If anyone thinks it's the first time he had done this type of thing you would be an idiot. Give him the death penalty and spare us all. He's got a brother named Brian with the same cocky attitude that'll probably end up in the pen with him. "

Sandy wrote on Jun 20, 2008 11:36 AM:

" Bill,
Your comments are ignorant, hateful and slanderous. Obviously you are not acquainted with Mike or his brother Brian. Mike has obviously made some poor decisions in his life and will have to face the consequences of his actions. Whether the consequences are just or unjust is a matter of opinion. In regards to Brian, your statement could not be further from the truth. He is a great husband and father. Furthermore, he is also a successful business man who contributes a great deal of time and money to his community and church. It is unfortunate that you made these comments without knowing the facts. "

Charles G wrote on Jun 30, 2008 5:32 PM:

" Hey, this guy did that and we already have a ban on guns in national parks, proof positive he would have done it anyway, so punish him and not me, there are myraids of reasons we need guns wherever we go. Like the email circulating, most men have the tools to become rapist, but most men arnt, so wise up you ignorant people and you too judge ! Remember,, always punish the guilty one not everyone else !!! "

Charles G wrote on Jun 30, 2008 5:41 PM:

" Too many of you are missing the point, yes he should be punished, but don't punish everyone else, I would say 4 years is a just punishment for this guy, bet when he gets out he won't do it again, I usuallyl have loaded guns in my vehicle, and see deer etc. all the time, but hey its against the law to shoot one off the road, out of season, in parks and where ever it isn't allowed, give everyone that breaks the law enough penality to make sure they don't do it again.. But, punish ONLY the guilty.. what a beautiful concept !! "

Legal Carrying Citizen wrote on Jul 24, 2008 2:39 AM:

" I can carry Legally a concealed weapon in at least 38 states. The goverment trust me to carry in most shopping malls and every walmart in the country. But when it comes to the National park system I guess I am a bigger threat there than in the populated areas. It all boils down to common sence. The people that commit these stupid crimes are not really worried weather the sign at the entrance says no fire arms. When are the political idiots that run this country going to realize this. The criminal generally does not care what laws you write and probably never will. The majority of the time they have more rights than the law biding citizen. "

junior wrote on Feb 11, 2009 6:21 PM:

" to bill. You had better hope Mike never sees you anywhere after the stupid comments you made. Sounds like he picked on you and you cant get over it. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.