HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Governor signs gun confiscation bill


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


CHEYENNE -- Gov. Dave Freudenthal on Friday signed into law a bill that prohibits government officials from confiscating guns from law-abiding citizens.

Sponsor Allen Jaggi, R-Lyman, has said House Bill 57 was prompted by the confiscation of guns by police in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina.

Freudenthal said afterward that he was pleased to sign the bill, although he didn't think it addressed any real problem.

But Freudenthal, an avid hunter who was endorsed by the National Rifle Association in his re-election campaign in 2006, said he can understand why supporters want the bill enacted here.

"It's not understandable on the basis that anybody around here is going to be confiscating anybody's firearms, because first of all we ain't going to allow anybody to do it," Freudenthal said.

Freudenthal said he intends to scrutinize a separate self-defense bill, HB 137, that has cleared the Legislature and is awaiting his action.

The so-called "castle doctrine" bill would specify that citizens are legally entitled to assume that any people who break into their homes mean to do them harm. It would also give people who kill others in self-defense immunity from lawsuits.

Supporters say the bill would offer citizens legal protection if they use deadly force against intruders. They say the bill is named after the English common-law concept that a man's home is his castle, and that he's not obligated to try to retreat before using deadly force to defend it.

The NRA has made passing such "castle doctrine" legislation a priority nationwide.

Freudenthal said he has asked Attorney General Bruce Salzburg to review the "castle doctrine" bill.

"It's so nuanced, depending on where the words are, and how it's structured and what it says, it may or may not have a problem," Freudenthal said.

Critics of the "castle doctrine" proposal include prosecutors who say that enacting it in Wyoming could have unintended consequences. They have said the state has a strong body of case law on self-defense that protects citizens' rights. They have said that codifying it could result in weakening the law.

Freudenthal said he's not surprised to see the NRA push such gun legislation in Wyoming.

"There's kind of an agenda that the NRA has, and it's not illogical that they'd come to these states first to get it passed," Freudenthal said.

"This is a pro-gun environment; we like firearms," Freudenthal said. "So it's not surprising that they would come to these kind of states to push that kind of agenda early. My guess is that it's a lot more responsive here than it would be in California. But in terms of, 'Are there real problems that have to be addressed?' Probably not."


Previous   Next
UW ponders parking, transportation options on campus   Douglas hospital expects more growth

Article Rating

Current Rating: 2.2 of 5 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 10 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Big Guns wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:26 AM:

" You will never take my gun's alive.
You can take the gun's from the innocent
but you can't get them from the crimanial
"

Dogs' Dad wrote on Mar 8, 2008 8:12 AM:

" Somebody ought to clue those provincial prosecutors that nationwide their arguments against the "Castle Doctrine"
are seen by the public whose
collective A$$es are in the line of fire as
maintenance of job security. "

SJSAMPLE` wrote on Mar 8, 2008 9:28 AM:

" Great title.
Nice job, "journalists". "

Say it aint so, Dave wrote on Mar 8, 2008 1:34 PM:

" It sounds like Gov Dave is considering vetoing the "Castle Doctrine" bill which was passed by both the Wyoming House and Senate. If he vetoes that bill, he has effectively thwarted the will of the citizens of Wyoming and gone off on his own to please his very liberal Democrat campaign contributors. Can you say Quid Pro Quo?? "

Eject wrote on Mar 8, 2008 5:25 PM:

" We need to get rid of him. His not for the real people of wy. "

hvacman wrote on Mar 10, 2008 9:15 AM:

" I hope this will pass and give us law abiding citezen's the right to livee in our home less of fear !!! "

Wendy W wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:46 AM:

" BUT, the government could always say "If you don't turn them in, then you're NOT law-abiding!." As a Jewess in the US, I want to remind everyone that criminals are stopped not by talk, but by FIREARMS. And furthermore, that America wasn't won with a registered gun. That is why all REAL Americans put our 2nd Amendment FIRST! "

motoboy wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:59 AM:

" OK, Uncle Dave, if you don't like the Castle Law just veto it and see what happens next.

And, by the way, it was introduced in lots of other states before Wyoming. "

martifr wrote on Apr 2, 2008 6:25 PM:

" They will take my guns if they pry them from my cold dead fingers. "

April wrote on Apr 2, 2008 7:06 PM:

" Good going Gov. Freudenthal, but what were you thinking in endorsing BARACK OBAMA?!? He's very pro gun control! Wyoming voters -- I hope you're noting this for the next election. All these liberals are jumping on the bandwagon for Obama and I don't get it, especially after all the press coverage over his affiliation with a very RACIST church that he CHOSE to stay with for TWENTY YRS and claims to have "never heard" the racist sermons of "Rev." Jeremiah Wright.! Yeah, and I have a bridge for sale. Either way he's either: a) stupid because he didn't figure out his "spiritual mentor's" ideologies and racism toward anyone that is NOT black, and or b) he's just another lying politician who's very good at it. I think both. God help us if Obama is elected! "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.