HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Lawmakers will review workers' comp concerns


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


Wyoming lawmakers have agreed to review benefits paid to workers who get hurt on the job in a comprehensive study of the Wyoming Workers' Compensation program.

"We are going to look at the benefits the employee has. We want to make sure those benefits are realistic in today's economy," said Rep. Jack Landon Jr., R-Sheridan.

Several worker advocate groups are pushing for reform in the program, which they allege has evolved into an "employer protection" system that discourages injured workers from filing claims at all.

The review of workers' compensation will be led by the Joint Labor, Health and Social Services Committee, which Sen. Charlie Scott, R-Casper, co-chairs.

Landon, who co-chairs the joint committee, said lawmakers will not review the basic foundation of workers' compensation. In 1915, Wyoming lawmakers repealed the right of workers to sue their employers even in cases where the employer is proven to be negligent or grossly negligent.

The trade-off was that workers would have a no-fault compensation program funded by employers to cover lost wages and medical costs for workplace injuries.

But worker advocates allege that legislators have been swayed by the business and industrial lobby to erode employee benefits over the years. Kim Floyd, executive director of the Wyoming AFL-CIO, told the Star-Tribune he suspects workers' compensation frivolously contests claims to discourage injured employers from using the system.

The Wyoming Trial Lawyers Association, Wyoming AFL-CIO and the Equality State Policy Center are pushing for several reforms to increase death and disability benefits.

Outgoing Workers' Compensation administrator Gary Child said he welcomes a review of the benefits structure, and said it's up to lawmakers to decide the appropriate levels of compensation.

"It's appropriate to review that structure. We want to be sure we are adequate with providing benefits," Child said.

Marion Loomis, executive director of the Wyoming Mining Association, said he believes the death benefit is probably too low. Whatever adjustments are made to benefits and the program in general, Loomis said it's important to ensure that workers' compensation is allowed to remain self-supportive with employer premiums.

"If they're going to look at it, go ahead and look at the benefits in workers compensation and see if adjustments need to be made," Loomis said.

Although workers' compensation is estimated to have a cash surplus of several million dollars, there are a large number of employers who are delinquent on their payments to the program. Child said the number of Wyoming employers past due on active accounts effective at the close of February was 1,621. Outstanding premiums totaled $1,432,232, according to workers' compensation.

Energy reporter Dustin Bleizeffer can be reached at (307) 577-6069 or dustin.bleizeffer@trib.com.


Previous   Next
Transcript of Obama interview with the Star-Tribune   Legislative briefs

Article Rating

Current Rating: 3 of 2 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 8 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

south dakota wrote on Mar 10, 2008 6:43 AM:

" I have a question? My niece showed me one of her paystub's & the place she was working for, was taking money out for workermans comp. can they do thay? she was even hurt or anything. "

BULL wrote on Mar 10, 2008 8:59 AM:

" Wyoming workers comp is corrupt. The antiquated rules they use to stick it to working folks need to be changed to be in place with today NOT 1915. They will continue to stick it to injured workers as long as the ruling dynasty,s in this state tell them to do so. "

Jon wrote on Mar 10, 2008 11:21 AM:

" SD and Bull are both playing left field.
To SD - my guess is that your niece's pay stub was reflecting what the employer was paying into WC (plus unemployment, etc).
To Bull - try wearing an employer hat sometime and let us all know how you think your employee's claims are handled. Tell us how you feel when your latest new hire suddenly has chronic back pain and wants disability, versus when a valued employee is injured and is anxious to get back to work and do their job. You can spot the difference a mile away, but WC has to treat the former as a first class citizen.

Try to comment with substance, not always from an empty 6 pack mentality. "

answering south dakota wrote on Mar 10, 2008 3:29 PM:

" "to South Dakota: the answer is no. please refer your neice to an auditor for Worker's Safety and Compensation in Cheyenne, Wyoming. good luck. "

BULL wrote on Mar 11, 2008 9:33 AM:

" Hey Jon , been ther and done that. I will side with the employees wether you like it or not. its the employees who have been getting the shaft from Wyoming workers comp for many years. Not theemployers. If some of you cant stand it , maybe you better move on. Facts is facts, and since I dont drink , fool , you can take your smart six pack mentality remark and put it in the shady area. "

gramps wrote on Mar 19, 2008 7:07 PM:

" I still would know.WHY THE PERDERTERMIND PAYMENT.iSN'T JUST THE TRADE BUT IT IN CLOUDES THE MINAMIM WAGE . MY TRADE PAYS 30+ $A hr+ binafits "

Buba wrote on Mar 21, 2008 11:14 PM:

" if employers cant pay take or restrickt their liceense to operate same as the state would do with my driver licensen same law .I would think bouth are linense.let me know if im wrong but it comes out of working persons pocket eneway? "

tubs wrote on Mar 22, 2008 3:18 PM:

" Thats wright Buba if I dont have insurance on my car they won't let me by A license plate "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.