HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

'People shouldn't be alarmed'


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


LANDER -- At least 13 wolves were killed in Wyoming in the first 10 days following their removal from the federal endangered species list.

If that pace were to continue, all of the known wolves in the Cowboy State's new wolf predator management area would be dead in fewer than three weeks, and 120 of the canines would be killed in the first three months of state management.

But such projections really have no value, a Wyoming Game and Fish Department spokesman said Friday, because there's no way the current pace of wolf kills can continue. And once the population in the predator area is exhausted, no additional wolves could be legally killed without Game and Fish Department approval.

More than 90 percent of Wyoming's estimated 350 wolves live inside the wolf trophy game zone, in the extreme northwest of the state, where the animals generally cannot be killed without a permit.

Before wolves were delisted March 28, an estimated 30 to 35 of the animals were living outside the trophy zone, in the new predator management area, where the canines can be shot on sight.

All 13 of the wolves known to have been killed so far have been taken in the predator zone -- 11 of them in Sublette County, and two in Fremont County.

"I think the pace is going to slow down for a couple of reasons," said Eric Keszler, spokesman for the Game and Fish Department. "First, there's not a whole lot of wolves in the predatory management area; the majority of Wyoming's wolves are in the trophy game area. Second, I think wolves will start to get smart, figure out what's going on and be harder for hunters to locate and track down."

Of the three latest confirmed kills, two of them were taken April 3 -- one male and one female -- in the South Pass area between Lander and Farson, according to Keszler. And one male wolf was destroyed April 6 near Bondurant.

No further information was available regarding the exact locations or circumstances of the kills.

Because people have up to 10 days to report wolf kills in the predator area, it is possible more than 13 have been killed.

"People shouldn't be alarmed," Keszler said. "I think what people need to realize is, last year the (U.S.) Fish and Wildlife Service took 68 wolves in Wyoming. I don't see us taking a whole lot more wolves than that."

Since 1995, Wyoming's wolf population has increased by an average of 24 percent annually, according to Ed Bangs, the former federal wolf recovery coordinator with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. About 10 percent of the total wolf population has been killed annually due to conflicts with wildlife, and about 9 percent has been killed illegally every year.

With an estimated population of 350 wolves in Wyoming, more than 80 of the canines would have to be killed in the Cowboy State this year before the population even starts to level off, let alone decline, Keszler said.

When wolves were under federal management, nearly all of the animals that were destroyed in the current predator zone were taken after they killed or bothered livestock.

Since delisting, at least some of the killed wolves have been shot by hunters, at times near elk feedgrounds. But Game and Fish officials do not know how many have been killed for sport, or reasons other than livestock protection.

Because the Game and Fish Department does not collect any detailed information regarding wolf kills in the predator area, and it makes no distinctions regarding types of wolf kills, it is impossible for the department to say how many wolves in the predator zone have been killed due to livestock conflicts, and how many for sport, Keszler said.

Under Wyoming's wolf management plan, the state is committed to maintaining 15 breeding pairs and at least 150 wolves inside state lines. When the animals were removed from protection under the federal Endangered Species Act at the end of March, there were an estimated 23 breeding pairs in the state -- 10 inside Yellowstone National Park and 13 outside, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

"Our wolf management plan commits us to managing for 15 breeding pairs, and we're not going to let it get below that," Keszler said. "But we're also not trying to reduce numbers to that bottom-floor number, either. We will proceed conservatively. We're going to take a conservative approach to the hunting season this fall in the trophy game area."

Keszler didn't know as of Friday afternoon whether any of the wolves killed in the predator zone in the last two weeks were breeding wolves.

Regardless of the Game and Fish Department's reassurances, the killing of more than a dozen wolves in Wyoming -- almost right out of the delisting gate -- looks, to some, like something to be worried about.

"It's alarming," said Louisa Willcox, wildlife advocate with the Natural Resources Defense Council, which is one of the conservation groups that is likely to be bringing suit against the wolf delisting decision at the end of this month. "These are just the wolves that have been reported. There's a possible 10-day lag between the day the wolves are killed and the day they are reported, so there could be a lot more dead wolves out there."

Willcox agrees that after many of the animals in the predator area are destroyed, the pace of the killing will probably slow down for a few months. But the wolves that are killed will soon be replaced by newly dispersing animals following the previous wolves' scent trail.

"The idea that we'll kill them off and then the conflicts will slow is flawed," she said. "As these areas become vacant (of wolves), there will be singles and couples checking them out and setting up shop. As long as there's suitable habitat, new wolves will connect the dots."

If all of the future dispersers are killed at the pace currently being witnessed in Wyoming, a great deal more wolves will be killed on an annual basis in the predator area than have been in the past, Willcox said.

Environment reporter Chris Merrill can be reached at chris.merrill@trib.com or at (307) 267-6722.


Previous   Next
Nothing naked here   Pipeline companies compete for routes to markets west and northeast

Article Rating

Current Rating: 1 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 29 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

No Bull wrote on Apr 12, 2008 9:40 AM:

" Sorry, Game and Fish, but I am ALARMED. I see that our state officials are now hoping that wolves become smarter. WOW! Why not erect sigs at the boundary between the trophy killing zone and the predator killing zone, so wolves can stop and read the fine print? This is nothing more than an admission of guilt that the state's wolf killing plan is a FAILURE! The kill plan was crafted to satisfy the generational whining of special interest groups who think they own the American West. These whiners hate the feds, but only until they need a handout from the feds. You know..... kill the predators, give me a free lease to use public lands, reimburse me for some kind of a disaster. Then, the feds are everyone's best drinking buddies. Bottoms up and aim straight and true. "

Wolfy wrote on Apr 12, 2008 7:07 PM:

" This lack of true wildlife management is insane. Wyoming has turned back into the perverted cowboy dreamland it once was. The Game and Fish department has allowed the rednecks to run Wyoming wildlife management for too long. Wyoming is a beautiful place with many wonderful natural features; too bad its being ruined by the fear-monger cowboys. I got tired of all the pinheaded cowpokes who had a unnatural love for their cows and despised anything else. So I left Wyoming and will not return until that state gets some sense.

Wyoming does not deserve to have beautiful, intelligent creatures like wolves, grizzlies, and bison; nor does it deserve any tourist or federal dollars. Too bad, they had a good thing going. BOYCOTT WYOMING until they stop killing OUR Wolves, Bears, and Bison!
"

Inky wrote on Apr 12, 2008 7:14 PM:

" Not be alarmed?
Wolves will adapt?
What are you guys smoking?
Historically, wolves were ERADICATED using weaponry that was primitive compared to the firepower today.
Coyotes? Yeah, eminantly adaptable, as they've proved for over 100 years.
Wolves are not as adaptable and to the extent they leave the trophy zone when following prey, they'll be easy pickings. "

Lamp Lighter wrote on Apr 13, 2008 8:38 AM:

" This only shows that people from wyoming don't want wolves, never did want wolves and can't stand seeing all the other animals torn to pieces by wolves and will take care of the problems if given the chance.............. "

So WYO wrote on Apr 13, 2008 1:49 PM:

" It's no surprise that Wyoming would kill as many wolves as it has "saved". The "ranchers" who are doing the killing have nothing better to do...thier cattle collect welfare checks to keep the ranch viable, so the "ranchers" grab their guns and go out huntin'. Wyoming Game and Fish will sound the alarm AFTER the damage has been done...or wait, 10 days after, since the hunters don't have to bother reporting their kills for that long. What's the sense in that? So we never "really" know the exact number until it's too late? They kill the animal, they know it, why not call it in? Like they have something BETTER to do?
Wyoming, you deserve what you get. "

good shot wrote on Apr 13, 2008 5:37 PM:

" we have been waiting for so long to be able to shoot these dogs again! Our grandfathers told us what they do to livestock, wild game, and how they hunted them because of that. It is high time they were shot at again and I say lets get them all!!!! "

crazy horse wrote on Apr 14, 2008 8:54 AM:

" Who's alarmed? "

It's about time wrote on Apr 14, 2008 10:00 AM:

" These envormentalist think just because these wolves were once free to roam that they should be again. What about the elk , deer, moose ,horses, field mice ect.
With no natural enemies the wolf can go any where and kill anything it wants. What are they going to kill next. Hikers would be a target. If you think they won't go for a human. Think again. "

wolf hating red neck wrote on Apr 14, 2008 4:19 PM:

" i am appauled that the hunters of wyoming have only kiiled 13 wolves. i was hoping for at 100 dead wolves the first 10 days. "

RoseD wrote on Apr 14, 2008 4:26 PM:

" Let's hope the true predators get stuck w/out their bullets - then at least the hunt will be fair for both sides. "

Idaho hunter wrote on Apr 15, 2008 10:51 PM:

" Can't live with 'em - can't live without 'em. "

Idaho Kid wrote on Apr 15, 2008 11:30 PM:

" Wolfy needs to understand that maybe the people of Wyoming never did want the old Cowboy dreamland to ever change. It's people like that who move in and try to change everything. Great that they moved out. Now take all the other wolf lovers on the list with you and leave the cowboy dreamland to the people who grew up and made Wyoming what it is. (or at least was) Too many people with their own agenda who probably have not put even one dime toward wildlife management want to get all disgusted at the hunters or fish and game and pet the pretty wolves. I say get a real life. Learn how to cope with life and do something productive. You people shouldn't even be allowed a voice. Just like the USFWS behind a desk in Washington making the laws and forcing wolves on people who have to live with them and don't want them. "

La Shuana wrote on Apr 16, 2008 10:35 AM:

" Wolves are beautiful, wondrous animals and I wish that we had then here in Sacramento. You people that kill animals are barbarians. Go to the store to get your fish and meat like civilized people do! "

Rolling Eyes wrote on Apr 16, 2008 12:23 PM:

" La Shuana - Where do you think the meat in the store comes from? "

Russ wrote on Apr 16, 2008 1:02 PM:

" The comment from La Shuana has to be a joke. Please La Shauna tell us your kidding! Wyoming is the Cowboy State and I hope it never changes. I have said this so many times before but it is worth repeating: Too many Americans think that their food comes from the store and somehow, as if by magic, is placed in the stores. Wake up. We need to insure that ranchers and farmers can make a living. Kill all the wolves. Wolfy, I am glad you moved and as far as I am concerned you can stay away. Have fun in New York, Washington, California or wherever your at. So Wyo go live on a ranch for a month and then tell us how ranchers have nothing better to do but shoot wolves. You people who care more about the wolf then humans are scarry. "

Ramon wrote on Apr 16, 2008 3:48 PM:

" La Shuana is a perfect example of most of urban America. They are completely divorced from where their food (and most everything else they use) comes from. Wake up Poke fans, this is the intellectual battle space that we face today. The ignorance of these folks is only exceeded by their sense of entitlement and utter arrogance.
"

sgeorge wrote on Apr 16, 2008 6:43 PM:

" wolves are beauitful animals as a matter of fact they are my favorite animal. I understand both sides. There are no known predators for the wolf. except for humans. I live in Indiana and about 10 or 15 years ago we had so many deer in one of our national parks that the deer were starving to death and eating up the grain from farmlands that they had too kill off so many to keep it under control. I know that some people take advantage of the wolf and kill something other than deer and bison, rabbit, squirrel ect, just because it's something different, and that's not right "

earthling wrote on Apr 17, 2008 6:21 AM:

" The 1st 10 days of this failed management plan has returned a 10% kill rate on the number of wolves in Wyoming. Ranchers are baiting wolves out of the trophy area to be shot because this great management plan doesn't have any provisions in it to prevent that. This great management plan also allows 10 full days to report a kill. It sure won't be hard to cheat on where you killed your wolf with a window like that. Now, does anyone still think that it won't be long before the wolf is relisted? Anyone? No, people shouldn't be alarmed because it's been proven time and time again that no one will cheat when there's money and bragging rights involved. "

Good Shot wrote on Apr 17, 2008 6:40 AM:

" Jeez, if the wolves get all the livestock because we can't control them, then you store people won't have your meat. If the costal cities and there ininformed people keep polluting their nests, then there won't be any fish either. Then everyone is down to eating sticks and twigs. I am sure that the people in Ethiopia would tell you that is a real bad diet, but FAT Americans would be definately on the right track. "

Ralph K wrote on Apr 17, 2008 12:26 PM:

" earthling, Just because you say something does not make it the truth. Where is your evidence that ranchers are baiting the wolves to draw them out of the trophy area? Most of us have to put in a full days work to make a go of it. I know of no one with the time on their hands to play any such game. Where is the beef? Was that just liable used only to incite more negative sentiment against those working to earn a living on the land? This new policy has not been in action for long enough to make a determination one way or the other as to its effectiveness. How about this, we've had liberal policies in place in America for 50 years now with no positive results, wasting tax dollars all the while. Why don't you and your liberal buddies attack them? You might better understand those issues and make a real difference in all of our lives for the better.
"

Rainbow wrote on Apr 17, 2008 6:56 PM:

" Ranchers are baiting wolves into the Predator Zone because they get to kill wolves AND get to collect the depredation cash if they happen to lose any livestock. I'm surprized you experts can't see that because it really is so simple. But then again, maybe I'm giving you too much credit. "

Dime Covers Three wrote on Apr 17, 2008 10:12 PM:

" Didn't want them twelve years ago still don't want them. My neighbor lost two of his family dogs to these killers. I will shoot every wolf I see and I can guarantee that I won't report shooting the vermin. Kick them into the brush and go get another. If they want them in Sacramento let's send them all there. La Shauna’s tune will change when Fluffy the poodle gets peeled out of the front yard and shredded by a nice furry wolf. "

earthling wrote on Apr 18, 2008 5:53 AM:

" I think the word you wanted to use was libel, Ralph K, not liable. That's l-i-b-e-l, and what you wrote suggests you don't know the difference. But that's cool. What you pretend ranchers WILL be liable for is the relisting of the the wolf to the Federal Endangered Species List. Baiting with calves and lambs is a win-win-win for you right now because you pull wolves out of the Trophy Zone, you get to shoot them, and you get paid for any depredations of your bait. That's sound animal management, wouldn't you say? I mean, after all, livestock is just another tool you use to get money, right? I wouldn't call it a game at all. "

Zuni wrote on Apr 18, 2008 12:46 PM:

" earthling; Answer the question loud mouth:

WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE AGAINST THE RANCHERS THAT THEY ARE BAITING WOLVES TO COME OUT OF THE TROPHY ZONE?

Put up coward, or shut up. No more of your "word baths" that say nothing.

Try to act like a man just once and directly answer the question. "

earthling wrote on Apr 18, 2008 5:37 PM:

" Looks like you're a little upset about something there Zuni. What is it? Are you mad that the truth about baiting has been exposed? Or is it that you really aren't a player in this whole discussion? Don't be all mad. Guys like you can still play big shot in your local bars on this subject with folks who don't know better. "

Dime Covers Three wrote on Apr 18, 2008 6:40 PM:

" You might as well forget it Zuni I've read the fools posts for a long time. He is a know nothing coward that probably never in his life has held an actual job that required work. Send the fool back to San Francisco to whine with the other wolf loving libs. "

Too Funny wrote on Apr 19, 2008 5:30 AM:

" I can see the future of adiction withdrawal. The enviros want the livestock gone so where will they get their shrooms. They will all be shaking so hard they will not be able to spike a tree.

Earthling I noticed you like to correct the spelling of those you disagree with so i guess that is why you did not say anything to Rainbow for miss spelling suprise on its (intended use of its) April 17 posting. Further your use of liable is incorrect in the sentence, you should have used responsible. "

read real good wrote on Apr 19, 2008 9:47 AM:

" Rainbow, Dakota, Earthling, Dewd, rance, lance, mack and several other posters are the exact same person. They come in and talk like they are different people agreeing with each other so as to bias the debate. Look at the writing styles and you will see it clearly. "

earthling wrote on Apr 19, 2008 4:04 PM:

" Read the post I was referring to Mr. Too Funny. To read real good, thanks for the compliment! Nothing pleases me more than to be confused with people who have a grip on what's right! You can call me any of those guys any time you want. One of us is going to get a Pulitzer on this issue. Just wait and see. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.