HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Climate change: Poor will suffer most


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


RANDY CRAFT
Perspective

A major personal milestone causes me to reflect on the well-being of our planet. Earlier this year I turned 50 years old.

Many good things have happened during my half-century: the moon landings, the explosion of information and communication capability now possible via the Internet, and medical breakthroughs that have dramatically improved our lives.

More ominous events also occurred. Human population more than doubled to 6.6 billion. Hunger, disease, poverty and war persist. But the threat that concerns me most is climate change.

With gradually increasing awareness, I’ve followed the climate debate over the years. During my days as a college student, relatively little concern was expressed about potential world-wide warming of planet Earth. However, evidence has accumulated over time indicating we humans are causing the global climate to change. Earth appears to be warming largely due to increased carbon dioxide emissions resulting from our excessive fossil fuel use. Though not completely predictable, consequences of human-induced climate change won’t likely be good.

Ironically, the world’s poorest people, those least responsible for greenhouse gas emissions, are those most likely to suffer impacts from climate change. Many of these people barely live at a subsistence level, fishing or farming on river floodplains and coastal areas. These areas are threatened by flooding as a warming climate causes the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to melt at increasing rates, leading to higher sea levels that threaten to inundate vast areas of farmland inhabited by these impoverished people. Millions may be forced from their homes and fields, having to seek higher ground. Many will become environmental refugees, fleeing to countries that may not be very welcoming.

Our nation’s failure to lead the world towards climate change solutions would be easier to accept if we were as vulnerable as citizens of developing nations. We would face the same risk of losing our homes, income, and personal security when we choose to continue with "business as usual." However, we will not be as vulnerable as those in other countries. Though the U.S. may face major climate-change-induced calamities, many of us can utilize our financial resources to "adapt" to a changing environment. For example, even if scarcity caused food prices to skyrocket, I and a majority of Americans could probably afford to continue buying food. Many of our brethren in Bangladesh and other developing nations already suffer from severe malnourishment due to food shortages. Without financial reserves, they may have to adapt to starvation.

Some would argue I’m feeling guilty because of my birth into a wealthy standard of living. Nonetheless, I believe along with this good fortune comes a responsibility to act on behalf of our neighbors who are at risk. My good fortune is not a God-given right to more than my share of global resources. I and millions of Americans have probably exceeded our rations given we live in a country where only 5 percent of the world’s human population is the largest consumer of many traded commodities. My point is we all could stand a little less materialism and its resultant release of green-house gases, negative impacts on Earth’s ecological services, and the unfair burden it places on the poor.

In 35 years my daughter will face a 50th birthday. What kind of world will she live in and what threats will humanity face? Will our nation have led the world to a new day where Earth’s fever is breaking, rising sea levels are spoken of in the past tense, and the right to prosperity for all poor people in all nations is sacrosanct? Or will our worst fears about climate change come true, causing my daughter to ask why our generation, though we had ample warning, didn’t do more to lessen the impacts?

My hope is that she will be living in a world that won’t have passed any critical "tipping point" beyond which the planet will be unlivable. I hope she and her generation will have a chance to enjoy all the good this world has to offer, a world where humankind intrinsically recognizes the importance of Earth’s life support systems and cares about the rich and poor alike. It is up to all of us now to give her and her generation that chance.

Randy Craft lives in Lander.


  Next
  Build a library, but do it right

Article Rating

Current Rating: 2.2 of 5 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 6 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

mo-homonid wrote on Apr 26, 2008 8:59 AM:

" Oh please. In 35 yrs your daughter will say, "My mom was wrong, it's global cooooling we need to worry about, please do your part and burn more fossil fuels mom."
As far as the poor "adapting", isn't that what evolution is about, shouldn't we be cheering it on? Survival of the fittest, right? Natural selection and adaptation, wonderful things! "

Marion wrote on Apr 27, 2008 6:30 AM:

" One reason there was no concern about global warming when you were in college is because that would have been the period we were in a tizzy over global cooling. Or did you miss that 30 years ago?????
If this winter is any indication we are headed back that way. "

Ralph wrote on Apr 27, 2008 10:41 AM:

" Mo, gives us more. It is quite enlightning to se a genius such as yourself at work. "

BULL wrote on Apr 28, 2008 8:32 AM:

" We dont have to wait until global warming kills off the poor, Bush & Cheneys great economy is doing it now. "

Global Warming Debunker wrote on Apr 28, 2008 12:25 PM:

" The Global Warming Cult's High Priest, Al Gore, and his enviro-fundamentalist cult followers, are the ones who are doing all the killing. The U.N. is openly admitting the push for "bio-fuels" is causing food shortages, and is already causing loss of life in poorer countries.

Thanks Al, that's one way to get rid of the world's surplus population.


Global warming rage lets global hunger grow

www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/04/14/ccview114.xml

"The reality is that people are dying already," said Jacques Diouf, of the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). "

Common Sense wrote on Apr 29, 2008 12:55 PM:

" I find it interesting that Randy's article encompasses the "self" and "we" part of the situation and in so many words says that humans (and each of us individually) are a part of the enviroment and we have control over what we do and how we affect things. However, the negative responses to this article point the finger elsewhere. No one takes personal responsiblity for what's going on around us. Further, the response that this winter should worry us about global cooling simply ignores the fact that warming and cooling trends cannot be looked at by one or two seasons. There is clear, long-term evidence that global warming is occurring and that human activity is accelerating it. It's too bad that many of the people responding feel like they are entitled to whatever they want and it doesn't matter how their choices affect others. Survival of the fittest? I say no, Americans survive because we were lucky enough not to be born in a poor and impoverished place. You wouldn't be singing the same tune about survival of the fittest if you had a different birthright. Finally, the quotes about Al Gore and the global warming cult seem narrowly focused as well. I believe true climate change activists have not pushed for bio-fuels, but for alternative renewable resources en masse. Bio-fuels and the increased food prices (and food shortages) have been pushed by people who have seen this as an easy answer and easy money without considering all the ramifications. Nothing's perfect, but money still talks, unfortunately. Besides, it's really the bio-fuels that has driven up the food prices and it has nothing to do with the skyrocketing crude oil prices, does it? (note the dripping sarcasm). "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.