HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Idaho considers wolf hunt rules


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


BOISE, Idaho -- Hunters searching Idaho's backcountry for wolves would be barred from using bait, snares, traps or electronic calls to help track the predators, but not required to discern between male and female targets.

A set of hunting recommendations proposed Thursday by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game would also bring an immediate end to the season once a mortality quota was reached through a combination of hunting, state sanction control measures, accidents or natural causes.

The total mortality quota suggested for a 2008 season is 328, a total state game officials say would yield a total wolf population estimated between 550 and 600 animals. That range is within the estimate called for in the state's broader wolf management plan approved in March.

"Our wolf plan is in place and our hunting rules follow the plan as closely as possible," Steve Nadeau, the agency's large carnivore manager, told The Associated Press. "We believe the plan for hunting assures the long term viability of wolf populations across the state."

The release of the hunting recommendations sets off a public comment period that expires May 16. After reviewing comments and making any changes, a final set of rules and season dates will be submitted to the Fish and Game Commission to review May 21.

It proposal's release also comes in the same week that environmental groups sued the federal government in an effort to overturn its decision in March to remove an estimated 1,500 wolves in Idaho, Wyoming and Montana from endangered species status.

For now, those three states are responsible for managing wolves under plans approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Like Idaho, Montana and Wyoming are also writing regulations for hunting the predators.

Despite the litigation, Idaho is moving forward with its plans to manage its wolf population, estimated in March at about 800. And part of its population control strategy is an open, public hunting season that could begin as early as September, under the recommendations.

Other rules proposed by the agency include:

* Bag limit: no hunter can take more wolves than allowed by per single hunting tag.

* Hunters must report a kill within 72 hours,

* Use of dogs to attract or pursue wolves is prohibited.

* Hunters are encouraged to avoid shooting wolves with radio collars.

The agency has also proposed four separate seasons, each with varying lengths. The longest season would begin Aug. 30 and stretch through March, while the shortest would start Oct. 10 and end Dec. 31. The agency does not favor one season over another, Nadeau said.

The recommendations also set up kill quotas within 12 wolf management zones, which were established in the overall management plan. The highest quotas are in the north central portion of the state, including a quota of 50 for the Lolo zone near the Montana border.

Nadeau says the rules call for closing hunting in a zone once a quota is reached, and closing the season statewide once the 328 total for mortality is reached in 2008.

The statewide quota was determined using a formula that factored in all reported wolf kills, including natural causes, road kills, hunting estimates and control measures. The equation also considers a 15 percent average growth rate in the population and the state's overall goal of managing a population between the range of 500 and 700 wolves.

Gary Macfarlane, spokesman for Friends of the Clearwater, one of the 12 groups involved in the federal lawsuit, said there are plenty of questions to be resolved before allowing wolf hunts. For example, he said the proposed quotas are too high in the northern part of the state, where wolf predation on weak and diseased deer, elk and other wildlife is critical to improving the health of the region's big game herds.

"We really don't think the quotas need to be so high in some of those zones," he said. "We're only going to delay the correction that needs to take place in the restoration of the elk population health."


Previous   Next
State board hears charter school appeal   Gov blasts BLM plan

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 7 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

XGoodWolfX wrote on May 7, 2008 2:28 AM:

" I feel kinda sorry for the Ralph Maughan lemmings....where will they waste their money next....once the lawsuits are thrown out????
Sportsmen please comment on the wolf plan......support the longest season possible...we have our work cut out....It's not going to be easy to whack 328 wolves...hopefully by 2010 we will be able to hunt year round and drop tag prices to encourage more hunters to get out and turn some wolves into GOODwolves!!!!

shoot straight

"

cj wrote on May 8, 2008 10:24 AM:

" Hunt year round huh? You must not have a real job. "

XGoodWolfX wrote on May 8, 2008 1:57 PM:

" Have a job that allows me to spend a lot of time AWAY from the pavement.....And fortunately I was wise enough not to waste hard earned money contributing to wolf hugger "conservation groups"....(You know the 12 that have you all fooled that they can overturn delisting) "

Kibby wrote on May 8, 2008 8:12 PM:

" There should be places where wolves can live unmolested, and places where they can be hunted like any other game animal. It's good to see that Idaho's at least trying to strike a balance between the vocal extremes, and maybe even making decisions based on science rather than politics. As usual, Wyoming could stand to take a few wildlife-management lessons from its neighbor. "

XGoodWolfX wrote on May 8, 2008 9:58 PM:

" You make some valid points Kibby....will be interesting to see this time next year....Wolves will become harder to hunt as they become educated...this is being witnessed in Alaska....Im from Idaho and think we may be taking a page out of your book...If we can't get numbers where they need to be with conservative hunting seasons.... "

Mike wrote on May 12, 2008 11:45 PM:

" As far as what Gary said about the seasons being to generous in the Northern part of the state.
I live in the Northern part of I daho and the tough winter that we are finally about over with has done quite a number on elk,deer and moose in unit 4 and some of the other units up here. There are also more wolves up here than most people are lead t believe. Fish and game has changes some of our seasons thisfall do the harsh winter and yes perhaps even the wolves. "

Black Diamond wrote on Jul 2, 2008 10:40 PM:

" THe cost per tag must exceed 1000.00 so that XGoodWolfX cannot afford to bag (what the incrediblly misinformed call Canus Lupis). "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.