HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Panel OKs bill to protect Wyo Range

The morning sun illuminates the peaks of the Wyoming Range near Bondurant earlier this spring. A bill approved by a Senate committee would put 1.2 million acres of the range off-limits to future oil and gas production. Photo by Mark Gocke, Star-Tribune correspondent.

Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


WASHINGTON -- Despite protests by some senators worried about world energy production, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved a bill Wednesday putting 1.2 million acres of the Wyoming Range off-limits to future oil and gas production.

Sen. John Barrasso introduced the bill in October, based on legislation that the late Wyoming Republican Sen. Craig Thomas had planned to offer. It passed 13-9 and now goes to the full Senate.

"The people of Wyoming have clearly done their part," Barrasso said. "And when I have town meetings and travel around the state, the people of Wyoming want to make sure that Wyoming still looks like Wyoming 20 and 40 years from now, for our children and our grandchildren."

The bill has the support of conservation and sporting groups and Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal, who flew to Washington and back on the same day to testify for it in February. The Petroleum Association of Wyoming opposes the measure.

Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., objected to the bill, calling it counterproductive at a time of high energy prices. She said the area includes 8.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and potentially 331 million barrels of oil. She noted that President Bush has asked OPEC to increase production.

"I just think actions like this send the wrong signals to OPEC," she said. "We just sent a letter asking them to open up their production, and this committee is going to this morning close areas in America for production? I don't understand that."

She said new technology allowing directional drilling would protect the landscape. Landrieu fought for years to open areas of the Gulf of Mexico to drilling and said Barrasso's bill would take more energy "off the table" than she successfully fought to put on.

"We're not moving forward, we're moving backwards," she said. "And I strongly object to this bill. This is not a local issue, this is a national issue."

Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, agreed. "This is a message that should not be sent to the world oil suppliers," he said.

Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., the top-ranking Republican on the panel, said he thinks the bill is a mistake but that he wouldn't try to derail it because both of Wyoming's senators favor it.

Barrasso said there are 4,300 producing oil and gas wells in the area and a proposed 4,400 additional wells that would not be affected by the legislation. He noted Wyoming is the No. 1 coal and uranium producer in the country and the No. 2 on-shore natural gas producer.

"There are certain places that we want to protect, and that is this area of the Wyoming Range," he said. "It does allow for directional exploration. It doesn't stop anything that's going on there currently."

Under the Wyoming Range Legacy Act of 2007, no additional oil and gas leasing, mining patents or geothermal leasing would be allowed in the 100-mile-long area of the range that is part of the Bridger-Teton National Forest in western Wyoming. No currently producing areas within the boundaries would be affected. For leases already issued in the area, the bill would establish a process to allow groups or individuals interested in conservation to buy back voluntarily offered leases and retire them permanently.

"On behalf of literally thousands of sportsmen and women across Wyoming, I want to say thank you to Sen. Barrasso for having the fortitude to stand up for Wyoming's rich outdoor heritage," said Tom Reed, spokesman for Sportsmen for the Wyoming Range. "The senator truly gets it. We need to keep some places as they are but not locked up."


  Next
  Wyoming Briefs: Rec Center, murder, and snow delays

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 2 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 10 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

TR wrote on May 8, 2008 8:15 AM:

" When it gets cold and the snow piles up in front of the city fools doors , they will like all that extra gas. Or they could just do without and freeze. "

WY native wrote on May 8, 2008 10:51 AM:

" Thank you Sen Barasso. Craig would have been please, as are we. "

oil and gas worker wrote on May 8, 2008 12:47 PM:

" Some people feed their families by working in the gas feilds as do I. The reason Wyomings economy is not taking a dive right now is also do to energy development. Like this rich Dr. Senator cares about the people that work for a living, and all of these treehuggers probably heat their homes with natural gas and drive a diesel. "

LaramieResident wrote on May 8, 2008 1:56 PM:

" Thank goodness we are getting some of our beautiful landscape protected. We don't need anymore development for natural gas until we build the infrastructure to get where it needs to go. Why do we continue to allow development, when we are only getting 1/3 price for it because our existing pipelines are already at capacity? Sc**w Sen. Larry Craig, and Landrieu. Craig tried to fight the Snake River designation as well, saying that the Snake River starts in Wyoming, but Idaho owns it. He should have resigned when he got caught rubbing legs in the airport bathroom. I say we shut off the pipeline to both of these states. Lets start drilling every bayou and swamp in Louisiana as well as the Sawtooths and Hell's Canyon whether there's gas there or not. "

Patriot wrote on May 8, 2008 6:38 PM:

" OIL & GAS Worker, FYI, Unions, working families from Rock Springs and many ranchers have supported this effort so take your uninformed comments and stick them where the sun don't shine. I also work in the oilfield. "

Wyoresident wrote on May 8, 2008 10:21 PM:

" This is a great thing. The Wyoming Range is a pristine place that needs to be protected. There are plenty of areas that are already developed and still have a lot of reserve. Why develop the wide open Wyoming spaces when they don't need to be? Also to oilandgasworker, just because people care about the landscape and the aesthetic value and how we use our spaces does not make them tree huggers but people who appreciate the state we live in and respect. "

Oil Field Worker wrote on May 9, 2008 1:06 AM:

" I too am part of the oil/gas production in Sublette County. Tell me, what is going to happen to all of the people who work in Sublette County oil fields? Unemployment is going to go up. The real estate (housing market) is going to go down the tubes. With a decline in population, the town/county won't be able to afford all of the medical personnel at the new clinic. Law enforcement personnel more than likely will be taking a cut. Looking at it in a different direction, maybe the people who have complained about the energy services, have made their money and its time to get rid the oil field trash...... ranchers sub divided their properties to sell them as housing options for the workers in the oil field - and made a good chunk of money, the physician/nurses who work at the clinic in Pinedale who complained about the pollution ( upper respiratory problems)-well some of them may need to pack their bags and plan on leaving as with a decrease in population their job may too come to an end. I'm sure more of the town / counties structure will be affected.
Sen. Barrasso has stated that he tried to come back to WY every weekend. Maybe he needs to spend a week in Sublette county, going to work with these oil field workers, and understanding a little more about What's going on in the real world.
We all want to save our lands for our future generations, but, maybe this isn't the correct solution. Oh, and I also like to hunt and fish. "

Kent W. wrote on May 10, 2008 6:27 AM:

" Oil and Gas worker
A good share of the Diesels driven by oil workers are powered by RED DIESEL taken from the rigs.The state should start spot checking a few of them.This would open a hell of a can of worms.
Wy Native "

Wisdom vs. Expediency wrote on May 15, 2008 10:31 AM:

" This is great news. We cannot keep sacrificing the future to meet short term desires. Once the wilderness is gone, it is gone for good and scared forever. As to our off-again-on-again economy in Wyoming, we will one day return to ranching and farming as the centerpiece of income when the fossil fuels are gone. Perhaps the wind energy industry will also take on a larger role in time. Hopefully we will have been wise and kept saving the profits from these days to perpetuate our fiscal solvency and smooth out the harder times. Let's hope that wisdom continues to prevail.
"

oiland gas worker wrote on May 22, 2008 9:25 AM:

" Patriot you are real mature. Why don't you pull your head out. With new technologies and regulations very little of the landscape is destroyed and reclaimation is also come a long way. Kent W , I am also a Wyoming native and love the wide open spaces here. I also like the economy from the oil and gas activity. There is a difference between tree huggers and concerned residents to those of you that replied to that statement. Sorry for not elaborating I thought there may be some smarter people on here. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.