HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Casper can learn from
Cheyenne tax projects


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


Star-Tribune Editorial Board

Laramie County has a few things it can teach Natrona County about getting voters to tax themselves to build a new library. The southeastern county did it in a 2003 election.

But last week's defeat of a 1 percent sales tax to construct a $55 million recreation center in Cheyenne was an example of how not to present such an issue to voters.

Supporters of the proposed $30 million library in Casper can learn valuable lessons from both experiences. Natrona County voters have never approved a sixth-cent special purpose tax.

Let's start with the successful project. Last year, an impressive $26.9 million, 103,000-square-foot library opened in downtown Cheyenne near the Capitol complex. Six months later, the facility made a top 10 list of best libraries in the nation.

How did the county pull it off?

People in the capital city had plenty of time to get used to the idea of a new library. The first phase of a master plan was finished in the 1990s, but the second phase was never completed and the library itself took the project off the ballot in 2000. Three years later, the county commissioners and the library board decided the time was right to go to the voters.

Library proponents met with patrons to find out what they wanted at the new facility. Thanks to that input, the three-story structure has more than 100 computers and printers, a 50-station computer center, five new meeting rooms with audio-visual services, and eight study rooms.

The project also upgraded the children's area of the library, but the planners said no to the wall-sized aquarium kids said they wanted.

The library board then held a lot of meetings to inform the public about the project. Voters knew what it included, what it didn't include, and how much everything would cost. They also knew approximately when the tax would end.

The lesson for Natrona County to consider is the importance of finding out what people want, deciding what is reasonable and mounting a strong educational campaign to sell voters on the idea.

The good news is that's exactly what the library board plans to do.

Now contrast that experience with the failure of the recreation center. Supporters of that project also asked what people wanted, but it doesn't appear that anything was ever pared from the list.

The proposed rec center included three swimming pools, three gyms, a running and walking track, an indoor fieldhouse, a boxing area, martial arts space, party rooms, racquetball courts, a climbing wall, and an all-purpose room. As items were added, the price tag ballooned from $35 million to $55 million.

The lesson? If you try to please everybody, it might cost so much that voters won't give their approval.

The poor national economy, including high fuel and grocery costs, was also cited as a factor by both backers and opponents of the rec center. But Wyoming's economy is doing much better than the rest of the country.

Natrona County residents should get involved in the process, so the library board can develop a plan that the entire community can be proud of. Then they need to go to the polls to support it.


Previous   Next
Wyo conservation bills
are off to a good start
  Think about being a mentor

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 3 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

hmmmmmm wrote on May 12, 2008 9:13 AM:

" our library is just fine if they need more parking add a level it will be cheaper.

want a meeting place why use the library there are other places. three only reason other places are not used is free is cheap.

our economy may be ok today but with the prices rising it will not be for long. add a tax for this and you will hurt the low paid workers and their families and that is stupid and inconsiderate just to have a state of the art building.

another thing perhaps we need to take care of things that make money for the community first. How about we fix the leaking roof and broken water fountains at the event center. how about we stop with the unnecessary statues and use that money. you fix what needs fixin first i might be ok with a new library but not now and not when other things need taken care of first.

there is no book in the state i can not get a copy of including books from the law library at cheyenne i just have to request it.

i have yet to see where a complete new building is needed at this time the current one is just fine. "

Ray W. jr. wrote on May 12, 2008 4:37 PM:

" Someone just wants to sell a piece of land to the county for a nice profit. The county commissioners will accommodate this scam too. "

librarypatron wrote on May 14, 2008 2:41 PM:

" In response to the previous comments regarding the proposed new library, the drive for a new library certainly is not for the purpose of selling a piece of land, as anyone who is a regular patron of the library can attest to -- the usage of our current library has stretched the space to its utmost limits.
I would also like to ask what information hmmmmmm is using to base the comment that adding a parking level will be cheaper? I believe the Library trustees have done their homework and checked out all posible solutions to evaluate the best available alternatives. As for the 1cent tax hurting low paid workers, I do not believe this to be the case as the tax would not affect either their housing or food, only disposible income. Those with more disposible income will pay an extra penny on each dollar they spend for 18 months when the tax would end. The library benefits every person in Natrona County, how much they can offer is up to you. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.