HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Park Service made right
decision on Sylvan Pass


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


Star-Tribune Editorial Board

The process was flawed, but the decision is right.

Sylvan Pass should remain open in winter, according to an agreement reached between the National Park Service and officials from Cody, Park County and Wyoming. It's not a done deal until the recommendation is finalized by Mike Snyder, regional director of the Park Service in Denver, but there seems to be nothing to preclude the deal from being approved.

The agreement means a lot to Wyoming's tourism industry and local communities, which fought hard to keep access to Yellowstone open through Sylvan Pass. Despite a huge amount of local opposition during the public comment process, the Park Service had stubbornly kept its recommendation to close the pass in winter due to avalanche dangers.

Last winter Snyder decided to keep the pass open when avalanche conditions permitted safe travel. More importantly, he required Park Service officials and area representatives to meet to determine what avalanche control methods can be safely used in the future.

Signalling how important the state considered the negotiations, both Gov. Dave Freudenthal and Wyoming's congressional delegation became key players in the talks that began in January in Billings, Mont.

Unfortunately, the negotiations were held in private instead of open to the public, as they should have been. The Park Service insisted on the closed meeting so both sides could talk "frankly." Wyoming officials should have insisted the negotiations be open, but they caved in to the demand. That sets a bad precedent for future meetings with the Park Service and other federal agencies.

Still, the talks did lead to the agreement announced Tuesday, and the Park Service should be commended for finally listening to what local authorities maintained all along: that avalanches at Sylvan Pass can be successfully managed for a reasonable cost by the use of howitzers and explosives deployed by a helicopter crew.

After some initially ridiculous assertions by the Park Service about the costs of avalanche control, the decision ended up not costing Wyoming too much. Local and state officials agreed to seek one-time funding assistance to buy three oversnow vehicles costing a total of about $366,000. Federal grants may be available, in addition to local funding sources.

The agreement with the Park Service is a victory for everyone who fought for it, including the governor, our congressional delegation, city and county officials and the grassroots group Shut Out of Yellowstone.

As Freudenthal said, access to Yellowstone over Sylvan Pass is a key element of the Park County and Cody economies, and a significant asset to the state of Wyoming. Thanks to everyone who made it happen.


Previous  
Workers' comp system
receives solid review
 

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 5 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

BULL wrote on Jun 6, 2008 11:09 AM:

" On the contrary , Sylvan Pass should be closed all winter , this whole fiasco is nothing more than an appeasement of rich snobs and a select few who seem to think they own the East Gate. If Cody & Powell would diversify thier economy better , they wouldnt be so adamant about stealing money from tourists year round. "

WyomingGal wrote on Jun 6, 2008 4:06 PM:

" Bull, while I generally agree with you on most topics, I can't do so on this one. I live in the area and feel I shouldn't have to go all the way around to another entrance to enjoy the 'people's national park'. With gas prices going ever skyward, it would be too cost prohibitive for me to enjoy my winter activities without having access to that particulargate. While I do agree with you that it is generally true that the businesses in these areas (Powell and Cody) rely on tourists dollars to maintain their profit margins, not all of the businesses there do so. I do own a small business, however, it is not dependent on tourism at any time of the year, rather, it is more for the local folk to utilize if they so choose to. So please don't characterize all of us small business owners that also happen to do business in this area into the same catagory as some of those money-grubbing bunch of folks who can't seem to be able to see enough into the future to diversify. "

Inky wrote on Jun 7, 2008 11:54 AM:

" Looks like another case of socialism (government handouts and subsidies) for entrenched private interests -- this in a state that supposedly prides itself for wanting no interference from DC, just a regular check.
I doubt if Powell and Cody businesses ever volunteered to pay for avalanche control on their own dime.
All this is moot, since ever-rising fuel costs signify the death-knell of motorized recreation anyway. Any futurists out there predict good times for Polaris or Yamaha? "

Truth B. Told wrote on Jun 8, 2008 10:59 AM:

" It was a mistake to agree to keep Sylvan Pass open. It serves very few park visitors at unreasonable cost. Would make much more economic sense to plow the stretch of road between Cooke City and Chief Joseph Hwy to allow year-round auto access to YNP.

Winter access to YNP via Sylvan provides absolutely no economic benefit to Cody, as many have argued. To suggest that Cody residents need winter access to the "peoples' park" is also faulty, as very few Cody residents visit the park in winter. These are the facts without the emotions.

So, kudo's for the compromise. But shame on all involved for waisting the effort on a misguided and misinformed waist of time and money. "

shrink govt wrote on Jun 11, 2008 2:12 PM:

" This is nothing more than handing out federal funds that don't exist to help local economies. It's no wonder we are broke as a nation, and its no wonder our economy is in shambles. We need to stop relying on federal government to prop up local economies - people need to take care of themselves. Whatever happened to that attitude? Wasn't it fundamental to our nation at one time? "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.