HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Will the hunt go on? Judge could derail wolf hunt

A gray wolf watches park visitors warily as it feeds on an elk carcass near the road in Yellowstone National Park on a recent morning. Wolves inside the park are protected from hunting, but a wolf hunt is planned in the surrounding areas this fall. Photo by JIM LAYBOURN, Star-Tribune correspondent.

Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


GREEN RIVER -- Like a lot of Wyoming hunters, Dale Patterson of Rock Springs is planning ahead for his trip to the Cody area this fall to hunt for bighorn sheep.

He might just pick up a wolf license as well.

"Looks like it right now," Patterson said about maybe trying to bag a wolf later this year in what is expected to be Wyoming's first-ever wolf hunting season.

Patterson was one of just three Sweetwater County sportsmen on hand Monday night at the first of several meetings to discuss the state's proposed gray wolf hunting regulations.

The new regulations provide for hunt areas, season dates and harvest quotas for gray wolf hunts.

The rule-making for the wolf hunt could all be for naught, however, cautioned Wyoming Game and Fish Wildlife Division Assistant Chief Bill Rudd.

The fate of gray wolves in the northern Rockies now rests in the hands of a federal judge after a coalition of advocacy groups asked U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy last week for an injunction to block the planned hunts in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho.

All three states plan a public wolf hunt this fall to harvest portions of the region's 1,500 wolves. Conservation groups contended in court, however, that a wolf hunt will lead to the reinstatement of federal protections for wolves under the Endangered Species Act.

The injunction, if granted, would effectively suspend any sport hunting of wolves in Wyoming next fall until the case is ultimately decided, Rudd said.

"We expect the judge's ruling at any time ... and it will certainly dictate the next step in our process," he said.

"He can decide for the state, and we stay on track with what we're doing ... or he could give back management to the (U.S.) Fish and Wildlife Service, in which case the hunting season will be stayed," said Rudd.

Under Wyoming's management plan, wolves in northwest Wyoming living outside of Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks have been designated as trophy game animals, to be managed and hunted similar to the way bears and mountain lions are managed.

Wolves living outside of the northwest portion of Wyoming are classified as predators and can be killed by anyone, at any time, by any means, much like the coyote.

Hunters would be able to kill up to 25 wolves in northwest Wyoming under the planned wolf hunt. The proposal still needs final approval from the Wyoming Game and Fish Commission when they meet in July.

Wyoming's proposed hunt would allow the taking of about 8 percent of the state's wolf population. Agency biologists said Wyoming's wolf population is growing by some 25 percent

per year.

According to the department's 2007 population estimates, there are 171 wolves inside the parks and 188 wolves outside, for a total of 359 wolves in Wyoming.

Four hunt areas

The department's proposed wolf hunt seasons divides northwest Wyoming into four hunting areas. The areas lay outside of Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks.

Gray wolves occupying the trophy game area of northwest would be hunted under the quota season, in which each of the four hunt areas would have a quota on the number of wolves that could be harvested. When the quota limit is reached, the hunting season would close.

Wyoming wildlife officials took a different approach to the hunt than neighboring Idaho. Idaho's plan sets a population objective for wolves at 518 animals for the state.

Wyoming's plan is more conservative and sets no population target for wolves in the state. Rudd said the agency does aim to keep 15 breeding pairs of wolves, or about 150 wolves, in the trophy game areas outside of the park.

Under the season proposal, hunters would be required to report wolf kills to the department within 24 hours. Wolves can be hunted with legal firearms and archery equipment. Hunters will be allowed to take one wolf per calendar year.

Patterson questioned the 24-hour reporting deadline for a legal wolf kill and said it would be hard for hunters "on foot" deep in the backcountry to report their harvest.

"Twenty-four hours is close to impossible when you're back in a long ways on foot ... and my experience with phone service in places like the Wind River [mountains] hasn't been good," he said. "Most of the time, you pack that [cell] phone in for no reason."

The Game and Fish is proposing a $18 resident wolf license and $180 for a nonresident hunting license. The hunts are generally set for Oct. 1 through Nov. 30.

Southwest Wyoming Bureau reporter Jeff Gearino can be reached at 307-875-5359 or at gearino@tribcsp.com.


Previous   Next
Gas plan project poses worries, company plans to put workers in motels   Irrigators: Dismiss feds' water petition

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 48 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Dewd wrote on Jun 10, 2008 9:51 AM:

" According to the sparse weekly Wolf Activity report at the Game and Fish website, there have not been any new Wolves killed in Wyoming in the last 2-3 weeks. I do not believe that is for lack of wolves ( in the predator zone) . The permits for nuisance Wolf removal inside the Trophy zone issued to ranchers appear to have also gone unfilled, at least in the Cody area. Happy hunting, boys.... "

crazy horse wrote on Jun 10, 2008 10:05 AM:

" We'll see what the judge decides. In the interim, the enviros have been crying about the management plan claiming it will decimate the wolf population and lead to relisting. In Wyoming's case, the math simply does not support that argument. Take 359 wolves times 1.25 equals 449 wolves less 25 wolves (assuming ALL the hunters are successful). That leaves 424 wolves. So expect USDA WS to aerial gun around 65 wolves because of livestock conflicts, very similar to what happened last year. It's not rocket science - it's simple third grade arithmetic. I hope that the judge is smart enough to have passed elementary school math. "

Tguide wrote on Jun 10, 2008 11:18 AM:

" Right on Crazy Horse! "

BooHoo wrote on Jun 11, 2008 6:56 AM:

" I would imagine they shopped this judge not for his math, but for his 'feelings and emotions', which is what this ridiculous suit is about. "

K wrote on Jun 11, 2008 10:19 AM:

" Even as a non-hunter the WYoming plan has and continues to make sense to me. I have not read the other state's plans but those are the ones the enviros seem to have more problem with. Unfortunately because of the wolf populations ranges we are bunched together with Idaho and Montana and whatever that judge (in whose impartiality I have no confidence) decides will affect us.

What I think the enviros fail to realize is that their claim that 5,000 wolves should be the recovery goal is unrealistic. There's no way the environment and absolutely no way the livestock industry could support 5,000 wolves. We have fundamentally changed the landscape in the hundred or so years since the wolf was wiped out and there wouldn't be enough prey animals to support their former populations. That said I think it's great that the wolf is back in certain area, especially Yellowstone.

The very worst that can happen is that the plans (which seem ok to me) might fail miserably and wolf populations will decline, in which case they will go back on federal protection (under which they are still occasionally killed). They can recover under that and we can try again with a new plan, we've gotten really good at this kind of thing. "

clarification wrote on Jun 11, 2008 12:10 PM:

" Just a correction to the math. Wyoming only has a total of around 160 wolves to manage in and outside of the trophy game (188 prior to the 20 or so killed in the predator zone area) - the rest are thankfully protected in YNP and GTNP - with the killing of another 25 wolves and wolves being removed by preying on livestock - Wyoming will be the state that requires the re-listing of the gray wolf - "

wolf killer wrote on Jun 11, 2008 4:00 PM:

" ok first off the wolf population is alot bigger than you all even can imagine in the two areas i hunt elk there is at least 25 wolves there. There a danger to to people, wildlife, and to livestock. i think that how wyoming has there wolf regulations should stay how they are. i myself have seen a wolf up close and you think bears and such are scary, then stare down a wolf or lets try 10 at once. even in yellow stone park it is a danger to have so many wolves. just let the state do what they are doing it is the right thing and it will work out in the end. "

crazy horse wrote on Jun 11, 2008 4:45 PM:

" clarification - I am not following YOUR math. OK let's humor you for a second - um 188 less 20 would be 168 (my calculator does not have an "or so" button). And I don't know where you are coming up with 20 or so, but I can tell you for a fact that out of those shot in the predator area at least 4 were aerial gunned by WS. In any event, let’s run through the math again supposing you are correct. Start with 359 wolves. Remove 20 (or so). Leaves 339 wolves (or so). Times 1.25. Equals 424 wolves. Less 25 wolves. Equals 399 wolves. Of course we could take the 25 away prior to accounting for the natural population growth to be aggressive and just for meanness sake. Start with 339 wolves, take away 25 wolves, multiply by 1.25, and you still end up with 393 wolves. Not much difference is there? That is because of the high reproductive rate and current population levels. Neither scenario drops the wolf population anywhere close to a level which would warrant putting wolves back on the endangered species list. Now of course WS will shoot some more, as they have every year. Will WS shoot so many that wolves go back on under ESA protection? You'd have to ask them, but probably not is my guess. They haven't so far to date. Perhaps you know of some other math that will get you to the relist number. Good luck, and keep trying! "

Tguide wrote on Jun 12, 2008 8:14 AM:

" Well done again crazy horse! "

bombgirl wrote on Jun 12, 2008 11:43 AM:

" i hope the judge grants the injunction. wolves should not be hunted in wyoming. if they are hunted it should be highly restricted. license and conservation stamp required. "

Over it... wrote on Jun 12, 2008 3:10 PM:

" bombgirl........your anti hunting attitude couldn't be more obvious. All the hunts that require a lisc will be heavily regulated to say the least!
crazy horse...right on! Tough to argue with that, although I am sure someone will try. "

crazy horse wrote on Jun 12, 2008 5:03 PM:

" Thanks Tguide...over it. Where are all the EcoSprites, earthdingalings, and the like on this story??? I suppose they do not wish to do battle with straightforward third grade math, which is irrefutable. What bombgirl overlooks (as has been the case for the enviros all along), is that if wolves are not shot by hunters, they will continue to be aerial gunned by WS. Interestingly enough, if wolves ARE shot by hunters, there will still be a fair number of wolves aerial gunned by WS. Hmmm - ponder that, my enviro buddies. "

Ron wrote on Jun 14, 2008 11:07 AM:

" I wonder if Summer tells her company's clients (including the hunting outfitters) about her anti-hunting views? I'm sure they would be interested... "

Dewd wrote on Jun 14, 2008 12:50 PM:

" Third grade math trumps Kindergarten. The one eyed man rules over the blind. Deaf in one ear sure beats the ignorance of utter silence. Without his guns and his flying machines, Man is seventh down the food chain and cannot keep ahead of The Wolf . There will be Trophy Wolf Hunting in Wyoming, and fools rush in. The only way the Great White Hunters of medieval Wyoming will get a rifle bullet to mortally wound a wild Wolf is if the Wolf lets him , is already infirm or just plain screwed up , or needed to be taken from the gene pool anyway. It will not be a display of a superior predator and his hunting prowess that results in a pelt , for the Wolf can and will embarass the slow dull witted rubythroated hominids, repeatedly. Best of luck hunting the Wolves , boys, because that is the only ways and means to take a Wolf..PDL...Pure Dumb Luck. Unless of course you have a Huey gunship helicopter or a modified coyote strafing Cessna. Then you might actually have a chance at getting a shot off... "

Over it... wrote on Jun 14, 2008 7:26 PM:

" Dewd..............please pass your utter confidence to all your enviro buddies. Maybe then our courts can spend their time focusing on something more important.
I will think of you each and every time I dump a wolf. "

crazy horse wrote on Jun 15, 2008 12:40 AM:

" Yes you need a Prozac Doodie. Don't fret about your psychotic listing of man's position on the food chain, because WS is still out there. In fact, they've contracted to kill wolves for WY G&F. FYI man is at the top of the food chain. I've seen plenty of wolves inside the trophy area. I don't hate wolves categorically - we just have too darn many now. With government trappers hired full time to kill coyotes (including poison baits), I fail to see where it made a lot of sense to introduce Canadian gray wolves to this area. It was a bad idea. If this would have not happened, wolves would not be on the menu today. Don't worry, WS will have a Cessna and an automatic shotgun loaded with buckshot. Try again with the math if you're energetic... "

irirq wrote on Jun 15, 2008 10:09 AM:

" Dewd .... If its gonna be so tough , what are all you wolfhuggers worried about ? "

earthling wrote on Jun 16, 2008 5:58 AM:

" Oh it's not the third grade math you so eloquently display here that's been keeping me from commenting up until now, it's the fact that I would be simply repeating what I've been saying all along, and I really do have bigger fish to fry. If the injunction does not go through and a wolf hunt is allowed in Wyoming, you wolf haters will have the wolf re-listed in less than a year. You guys are just too rabid about finally being able to shoot at a wolf that it's going to be buck-fever up there this fall. You'll haul the carcass to an area outside the trophy zone to get around the new 24 hour reporting requirement. There already has been an illegal wolf killing in Grand Teton National Park so far this year. The wolf was shot just off the highway. You wolf haters have proven you can't police yourselves or play by the rules, so the wolf will be re-listed and you'll just have to deal with it. "

Tguide wrote on Jun 16, 2008 9:51 AM:

" DewD, I have to agree with "over it". Your comments are idiotic! But, maybe that "29 mile" pack trip over Mountain Creek did it! Hey everyone look.....its a bird..... no its a plane......NO it's Oooole wise ex-packer DewD from Mountain Creek! Don't worry DewD, there are plenty of us here in "medieval" Wyoming who have the skills to take a healthy wolf! We all know you don't have the skills to do the same, don't worry... we'll take one for you. Give us your address and we'll send you a pelt! "

crazy horse wrote on Jun 16, 2008 12:08 PM:

" Ah earthling, glad to see that you DO appreciate the power of math. Now tell us all, what part of the third grade math do you fail to comprehend, grasp, or follow? Don't look for wolves to be relisted anytime soon, because the math just does not support that outcome. And you continue to mischaracterize people in the recovery area as rabid wolf haters. I don't hate wolves. I do think it was a stupid idea to turn them loose here, and now we have too many for the habitat to support. That's why WS has been aerial gunning them almost from the start, an unfortunate outcome that resulted from a BAD IDEA. I personally have neither the time nor inclination to specifically hunt wolves this fall. I will buy a tag, and if I see a wolf while big game hunting I will shoot it, if for no other reason than to send you a wolf taco and a fur hat lol. That said, the proposed wolf hunt this fall will have no impact on wolf numbers. Plan on lethal control by WS to be the main factor in keeping numbers under control going forward. "

ashamed wrote on Jun 16, 2008 12:42 PM:

" Im ashamed to be a native right now. Seems evolution is running backward and the caveman mentality of kill or be killed has kicked in. Please know that not all of us are of this mind set.. Again ignorance speaks with a loud voice.. "

wyonative wrote on Jun 16, 2008 2:15 PM:

" Hold on a minute earthling... there are animals of just about every variety that get poached out of their hunting season. As an ethical hunter I really resent your remarks. Those willing to break laws will do so on any avenue, possibly including burglarizing your home or worse. Not everyone is always willing to play be the rules or police themselves as you say. Did you hear about the 27-year-old man who kicked, punched and stomped a toddler to death in California? How about he couple in North Carolina who tied their 13-year-old to a tree for disobedient behavior for over 18 hours - sure enough he died. Your belief that you can lump ethical Wyoming hunters - who just might be excited to be able to obtain a wolf hunting license for the first time - in with a bunch of real life, hard core, law breaking murders tells me that maybe you need to get another belief to feel so passionately about. Cause you know what? There is not a wolf alive who appreciates your concern and he would still eat you, your children and your pets if he was hungry. "

wowser wrote on Jun 16, 2008 2:57 PM:

" There already has been an illegal wolf killing in Grand Teton National Park so far this year.
OMG! At that rate there could be 2 wolves illegally killed this year. When will this ruthless carnage stop, and how can we prevent it? If this keeps up wolves will most certainly be right back on the endangered list! "

Tguide wrote on Jun 16, 2008 3:22 PM:

" Your right ashamed! You do have a loud voice. "

Moonbeam wrote on Jun 16, 2008 3:31 PM:

" Dewd, I highly suggest that you seek help for the drug/mental problem and also that you leave solving real issues to people equipped to do so. I cannot say that I am sorry for your lot in life or your taken position in this matter. You've had your constitutional say in public, hooray. I do hope that other non-thinkers will learn from your example how foolish this emotive political position is, and how unsupported your argument for that position is. Life is just to short and precious to have it's decisions left up to people like you. Enjoy your tofu dinner and hemp desert. "

Holly wrote on Jun 16, 2008 4:02 PM:

" The pro-wolf (at the cost of all else) crowd just doesn't have an argument that adds up. Why is anyone listening to them? We don't ordinarily listen to the uninformed, so why on this occasion should we? "

Rhiley wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:11 AM:

" I agree with Holly and others posting here, the anti-wolf hunting people's numbers do not add up. It seems that the state's plan is working and at a lesser cost to the tax payers. "

Nic wrote on Jun 17, 2008 2:48 PM:

" How is Vermont this time of year ashamed? "

Do the Math wrote on Jun 17, 2008 3:07 PM:

" The pro-wolf math adds up just like many of the other arguments that various "theme groups" have emotively made over time. You know, every 5 second 10 people die of AIDES (do the math, we're all dead twice over since 1986) or that slave traders threw their "cargo" over board and killed 6 million slaves (again do the math, there would be no African Americans in the country today) and no one questions these phony stats (or why any "merchant" would throw his payload overboard). Come on people, think. They're trying to fool us once again with bunk numbers and bunk science. "

Marion wrote on Jun 17, 2008 4:25 PM:

" I hope everyone, including those weeping and wailing about the "slaughter" of the poor innocent wolfie, has read the testimony that Dr. Mech presented to the court. The judge will have to fly in the face of well stated science by a world renown wolf expert if he tries to rule for his buddies. It of course will be made harder since there have been less wolves killed this year than in the last few years by FWS. The most danger they are in is from the wolf huggers squeezing them to death in their emotional distress. "

highmarkin wrote on Jun 17, 2008 9:28 PM:

" Man o' man. I guess the same old pro wolf folks are still at it here spouting the same rhetoric in months past.DOO-DEE,earthling and the rest of you make believe wolf experts continue to prove your real ignorance about the majority of real sportsmen and women.The real problem you have with this whole situation is plain and simple,you did not get your way and now your trying to find anything you can to save face.The majority of people in this state did not want this reintroduction to start with but to no avail the super liberals got someone to listen to their jibberish nonetheless.We as hunters came to the conclusion that we were going to have wolves stuffed down our throats and at our expense as well.Personally I can accept the fact that wolves are going to be part of Wyoming,but not the fact that people that don't reside here and the few who claim that they do telling the REAL people of this state how to live and conduct themselves.Just because someone wants to hunt a wolf does not mean that they will be succesful in taking one.It's obvious to me ,and I am sure others here that a few people commenting here have no idea about real hunting.There are plenty of folks that get tags and never even succeed in filling them, so maybe some of you math experts here better figure some other parts of that equation in.You don't want to because then your over inflated prediction on the wolf being wiped clean just won't hold water will it?The state has presented an excellent plan that will be fair to both sides here so why don't you just sit down and relax and quit being so negative to the REAL hunting community. "

EcoSprite wrote on Jun 18, 2008 6:02 AM:

" I guess you'd know all about what it's like to spend money on a tag and not get anything, eh highmarkin? Probably a real expert at that. I think that's great that the state will get money for wolf tags that will never be filled by all you blowhards. And there have been more wolves than one illegally killed in Wyoming since 1995- just not by any of you. Be sure to take your camera when you go hunting for wolves all you great white hunters. That may be the only evidence you come back with proving you actually saw one. Ha ha. Or maybe you don't want to have a camera with you because then people would ask why you couldn't kill any of the wolves you saw. HA HA HA! Either way, the state still gets your money and the wolves remain safe to provide balance to the ecosystem for yet another day, week, month, year. Ha Ha Ha Ha!!! "

BooHoo wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:12 AM:

" one wolf eats one elk every two weeks. 4oo+ wolves. Dew the math! That doesn't include elk abortions. "

Tguide wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:27 AM:

" Well said highmarkin! "

crazy horse wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:37 PM:

" Very nice nonsensical effete drivel and gibberish there EcoLoonie, woven neatly together into a meaningless paragraph. If I see a wolf while big game hunting, I'll be reaching for something OTHER than a camera. Oh - and well put highmarkin. "

EcoSprite wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:35 PM:

" That wouldn't be toilet paper you'd be reaching for, would it crazy horse? "

WyoWolfHunter wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:13 PM:

" EcoSprite, Your "word bath" provides only negative value to this dialog.

Word Bath: a stream of unconnected empty phrases strung together in an attempt to obfuscate actual meaning or to defend an indefensible position in argument. In short; diarrhea of the mouth powered by constipation of the mind. "

Over it... wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:48 PM:

" One word for you ECO.......BANG! "

highmarkin wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:55 PM:

" Well EcoSprite I see some things never change with some folks.You tell us how we will never see any wolves yet several months back you claimed to have seen many.I find that hard to believe,since you don't live in this state(ALTHOUGH YOU CLAIM YOU DO).Everyone here takes you for what you are....a nothing, with your constant head up your a-- comments.As for me not filling my tags you need not worry, I have killed an elk every year I have been hunting in my NATIVE state.Any time I did not fill a tag for other animals was do to the fact that I am a true hunter and chose not to,not for the fact that I did not have the oppurtunity.See the difference between me and you is I see things for real, not through the window of my Subaru at Yellowstone on my annual visit.The problem with people like you is that you don't understand what hunters/sportsmen are really about.You sterotype us with those who abuse the great oppurtunity to enjoy the hunt and what it stands for.It's about the time spent with family like my brother and nephew in a ground blind hunting spring bear or hunting with my 78 yr old grandad who is still working as a carpenter 10-12 hrs a day because he can and or watching my wife harvest her first spring black bear this year.Why don't you take notice of K who posted here, that does not hunt, but understands what it is truly about before you open your gaping trap.You are the reason people are still getting punched in the mouth,mainly because you are ignorant. "

EcoSprite wrote on Jun 19, 2008 5:23 AM:

" Ummm ... gee, OK highmarkin ... if you say so. I'll bet that makes you guys feel like really big men when you threaten me with violence because I can call it like it is. Not the first time either. More proof you have adequacy issues. Start saving for your non-resident wolf tags boys. They're $180 bucks this year. Remember, we get your money for a license BEFORE you get here. Too bad you won't take anything with you when you go back home after your "wolf" hunt, except for a hang-over and some lies to tell the folks back home. Ha Ha Ha!!!! "

crazy horse wrote on Jun 19, 2008 9:46 AM:

" Incorrect, as usual, EcoDrivel. Guess again...the only reason I would be reaching for toilet paper would be if I stepped in some EcoSprite and needed to wipe it off my boot. LOL. "

Rainbow wrote on Jun 19, 2008 10:05 AM:

" Excellent job speedbagging those redneck wolf haters EcoSprite! It's good to know that there are those in this state who know the value of balance in an ecosystem. Plus, it's always fun to read clever comebacks to the same tired old redneck noise about hunting and fourth generation natives and killing animals and how good they are at 3rd grade math and, not to mention, how tough these guys think they are. Way to put them in their place! Well done, indeed!! "

Sharon F wrote on Jun 19, 2008 12:03 PM:

" My husband and I moved to Wyoming a few years ago because of his job. At first I was shocked to learn that people still hunted for animals and in a big way out west. I began to learn over time how the balance of things has changed and that by hunting man is helping to regulate the balance. I have since also learned that the real motive behind the people that don't like hunting has nothing to do with hunting at all. The people that oppose hunting or for that matter most outdoor activities actually oppose all human impact on the planet when it comes right down to it. So, in reality, these anti-hunting people oppose themselves because none of us can live on this planet without impacting the habitat and the wildlife. That is unless we return to caves and eat only plants that are in great abundance after they have reproduced themselves and are spent. The true basis of this opposition to human activity is in and of itself completely illogical and unjustified when one really drills down into it. If a NYC city girl like me can figure this out on her own, surely anyone that lives in the west can do so too. "

Tguide wrote on Jun 19, 2008 3:00 PM:

" C'mon crazy horse, EcoSprite bested you rather neatly. Why can't you say, "Touche`"? Because your a little too full of yourself is what I'd say. "

Mr Green Jeans wrote on Jun 19, 2008 3:45 PM:

" EcoSprite - shouldn't you be heading to the big Rainbow gathering at the Big Sandy? "

crazy horse wrote on Jun 19, 2008 3:54 PM:

" Too funny there EcoDummy. Clearly when you are bested you resort to using assumed names. "

Tguide wrote on Jun 19, 2008 7:47 PM:

" Thanks for seeing thru that 6/19, 3:00pm blog crazy horse! Obviously it was not me! And I assure you rainbow, ecofreak is not schooling anyone but you! But, we all know your rainbow is only black and white, RAINBOW! Thanks Sharon for having some good ole commen sense! "

crazy horse wrote on Jun 20, 2008 9:29 AM:

" Yes I knew, of course, that the comment was not from you Tguide. In any event, those who favor relisting of wolves have not, and continue to fail to, bring any arguments of substance to the discussion. I have demonstrated simply and clearly where the math does not support any argument for relisting. In light of that, and assuming the judge is an intelligent individual, I think this suit will get tossed out of court shortly. Then the wolf huggers can kick back and wait for the hunting season to commence. We'll just have to wait and see. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.