JOAN BARRON
CHEYENNE -- One of the early puzzlers to come out of the Republican primary for U.S. House is the fuss over candidate Mark Gordon's contributions to Democratic candidates.
This is an honored tradition in Wyoming and is why campaign contributions reports are so interesting.
All three of the recent Democratic governors received money and votes from Republicans. It was the GOP votes that propelled them into office.
That was why you could find so many Republicans serving in the administrations of Ed Herschler, Mike Sullivan and the current Democratic chief executive, Dave Freudenthal.
Sullivan also had plenty of support from high-level Republicans in his hometown of Casper, who not only donated money to his campaigns but were valuable chief advisers.
And let us not forget that the Republicans nominated Eli Bebout of Riverton to be their candidate for governor in 2002. Bebout was formerly a Democrat. He lost the general election to Freudenthal and now is a member of the Wyoming Senate.
This should demonstrate how often political lines blur in this state.
The initial attack on Gordon for his donations to Democrats has shoddy origins, given that it was circulated anonymously with a false return address. The shadowy source diminishes the effectiveness and credibility of the message. It shouldn't damage Gordon's campaign.
His challenge will be to convince voters he is qualified for the nomination and the chance to replace retiring GOP Congresswoman Barbara Cubin.
The other front-runner for the nomination, Cynthia Lummis of Cheyenne, can and does point to her years of experience in both branches of government -- as a legislator and two terms as state treasurer.
She bills herself as a genuine conservative Wyoming Republican.
The question will be whether Gordon's well-financed campaign and his television ads can balance out Lummis' experience.
And whether he can dodge the rap of not being a genuine Republican, let alone a conservative one.
Although it is a historical year with all three congressional delegation seats up for election at the same time, the U.S. Senate races haven't stirred much electricity so far.
The U.S. House race promises to be the most interesting. The other candidates are Bill Winney of Bondurant, a retired naval captain, and Michael Holland, a Green River physician.
Barring unforeseen circumstances the contest will be between Lummis and Gordon.
Democrat Gary Trauner of Teton County is running unopposed for his party's nomination. Also in the mix is Libertarian W. David Herbert of Cody.
The four-candidate contest is a little smaller than the turnout expected for an open seat.
Lummis supporters point to her selection by the Republican Central Committee last year as one of the candidates for the U.S. Senate seat made vacant by the death of Sen. Craig Thomas.
Freudenthal ultimately appointed Casper physician and state senator John Barrasso to fill out the four years remaining in Thomas' elected term of office.
The third candidate for the seat was Tom Sansonetti, a longtime GOP activist and former Department of Interior honcho.
Lummis' finalist status demonstrates her popularity among state GOP activists and insiders. But some Republicans say their central committee is much more conservative than the typical Republican voters in the state.
It's possible that with the new demographics in the state more Republican voters will be on the moderate side.
The widespread national voter unhappiness may also be reflected here in the federal races. No one is predicting a Democratic sweep, though.
We will get a taste of the Republican mood in the Aug. 19 primary election.
Contact Joan Barron at joan.barron@trib.com or by phone at 307-632-1244.
Reader Comments
Comments to this story.
TR wrote on Jun 15, 2008 6:57 PM:
Eskimo Pie wrote on Jun 15, 2008 9:53 PM:
Hawk Eye wrote on Jun 15, 2008 11:08 PM:
WYSkippy wrote on Jun 16, 2008 7:25 AM:
The article headline says "Giving to Dems a GOP tradition" I was waiting for the article to detail campaign contributions from GOP candidates to their rivals in the past, but I did not see any. This is shaping up to being an endorsement for Gordon from the CST which would surprise no one. "
Fandango wrote on Jun 16, 2008 8:24 AM:
Timmothy Schmidt wrote on Jun 16, 2008 8:30 AM:
Too Slanted wrote on Jun 16, 2008 11:28 AM:
What is at question is "IF" elected would Gordon uphold the Republican platform, would he vote as a Conservative or would he follow where his money has been for 20 plus years and take a Liberal stand on issues? You give a candidate money to be elected because their views/ideas on issues are most closely related to your own - not because you are mad at the party for the last 20 plus years.
Thank you CST for continuing to keep this story alive, if it died then people would not remember it come election day. This does not bode well for Gordon to continuously explain, explain, let the CST explain for you, explain his past actions and not talk about current issues. "
Timmothy Schmidt wrote on Jun 16, 2008 11:55 AM:
devo wrote on Jun 16, 2008 4:04 PM:
As a democrat however, I was worried when Mark decided to enter the race. He represented such a powerful thoughtful independent leadership that I imagined would have resonated with Wyomingites, meaning the chance of a democratic pickup in Wyoming was far less likely than it already is. But I'm very relieved to see that the brain dead are more than happy to attack what is actually the strongest of their candidates, and will leave standing to represent the GOP Babs v 2.0. "
Get Real wrote on Jun 16, 2008 4:50 PM:
Fandango said "He ain't too bad to look at", so that's enough reason for her to vote for him. Get real! What are you people thinking?!
Experience counts in every other profession: business, medicine, law, teaching, etc. Why are you all so willing to send someone to Congress that hasn't even served on a City Council or in the State Legislature? Congress is a BIG job. Shouldn't Gordon have had to pay some dues somewhere to deserve it?? "
Too Slanted wrote on Jun 17, 2008 1:12 PM:
When we send a Representative or Senator to Washington D.C. we do so knowing what party they are from and thus how they will vote on certain issues. Not all Repubs or Dems believe in everything their party does, but their core political values reflect those most closely related to their party affiliation. The climate in D.C. is not that of Casper Wyoming, there is a distinct line in the sand and you choose which side you stand on – that is one of the biggest reasons Congress can’t get anything done – its all partisan politics which is not independent of the party system. "
Timmothy Schmidt wrote on Jun 17, 2008 3:46 PM:
Obviously you haven’t done any research on Mark, “Get Real”. One of the reasons Mark is running for congress is to (and yes this is a direct quote from Mark’s web page): “take back government from professional politicians and Washington insiders to promote and diversify Wyoming's economy while protecting its future.”
Obviously Mark isn’t a professional politician, or Barbra Cubin’s clone.
He does however have experience; experience at being a hardworking Wyoming rancher on four different ranchers for 35 years. Experience at raising a close-knit family, while still having time to coach soccer (one of his favorite sports) and participate in other various community activities. He is the epitome of a Wyoming man.
He ranches, he is a businessman, and he is a father.
Mark Gordon is Wyoming! "
Paper Tiger wrote on Jun 17, 2008 5:15 PM:
Erin L. wrote on Jun 17, 2008 7:08 PM:
Get Real wrote on Jun 17, 2008 7:54 PM:
Coaching a kid's soccer team qualifies Gordon for Congress? Are you joking?!! "
Erin L. wrote on Jun 17, 2008 10:07 PM:
Timmothy Schmidt wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:59 AM:
1.) “Get Real” do you suggest we send a second Barbra Cubin, Mrs. Lummis, or wait is it Mrs. Wiederspahn, to Washington? (cause we all know she did a bang up job for us there!)
2.) “Get Real” you obviously dislike Mark and his “Fresh Face”, so do you suggest we continue to let political big-wigs, who know the system, but can’t seem to get a dang thing done, run congress?
3.) “Get Real” when you’re being under represented how do you fix this problem? Do you continue what you have been doing and bad-mouth change and whine about how under represented you are?
“Get Real” I’m sure if you did some logical research on Mark through his web page – www.gordon08.com you would find that he would be great for Wyoming "
Randy S. wrote on Jun 19, 2008 6:12 AM:
Randy S. wrote on Jun 19, 2008 6:18 AM:
Jimy Barclay wrote on Jun 19, 2008 10:58 AM:
Larry S. wrote on Jun 19, 2008 1:11 PM:
Marce wrote on Jun 19, 2008 2:49 PM:
Too Slanted wrote on Jun 19, 2008 5:00 PM:
Mrs. Lang wrote on Jun 19, 2008 9:34 PM:
Larry S. wrote on Jun 20, 2008 5:55 AM:
If you'll re-read what I wrote and agree with making the tax cuts for the richest 1% of the US permanent while the middle and lower income classes of this country shoulder the tax burden for that BS war and the highest deficit in the history of this planet, all the while trying to keep up with the skyrocketing costs of fuel, housing and food, then by all means -vote for Gordon. That will certainly prove what your values are. But if you think that maybe ALL Americans should pay their fair share of taxes, based soley on their ability to pay, then perhaps you should consider Gary Trauner. If you'll do just a little homework on the history of trickle-down economics you'll see that it has NEVER worked and only widens the gap between rich and non-rich. I wonder if Gordon wasn't a millionaire, would he see how unfair the current tax system is? Seems to me like his tax plan serves him first, and makes life just that much harder for the rest of us. Sorry, but the REAL working people of Wyoming can't afford any more Cubin-esque pandering to the rich special interests at our expense. "
Ethics wrote on Jun 20, 2008 9:14 AM:
Too Slanted wrote on Jun 20, 2008 4:55 PM:
Do you really find it "rude and hateful" to ask the question :
""IF" elected would Gordon uphold the Republican platform, would he vote as a Conservative or would he follow where his money has been for 20 plus years and take a Liberal stand on issues?" (see my post on 6.16.08)
This is a legitimate question to pose considering his contributions have gone mainly to Democrats (until he decide you wanted to run as a Republican). I will reiterate what I said before – you provide a candidate with contributions to get them elected because the candidate most closely represents your core political values. Gordon has proven with contributions to Dems for 20 plus years and sitting on the Board of the Sierra Club that he is more of a Liberal than a Conservative. This is not about Gordon personally (or you for supporting him so get over yourself) this is about Gordon POLITICALLY and why most Republicans will not vote for him. That may be what you find so rude and hateful. "
Bikers for Obama wrote on Jun 20, 2008 5:52 PM:
Timmothy S. wrote on Jun 20, 2008 9:07 PM:
I’m not even sure this argument is about the candidates anymore however. I think people are afraid of Mark, I think there are some people embarrassed to fight for THEIR candidate. I believe in this quote “Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong.” ~Richard Armour. There isn’t going to be one candidate that you totally agree with on every single issue, EVER! Mark is my candidate, because we share similar beliefs on the majority of the important issues. Also, he is a quality guy I have met with him on occasion and he is knowledgeable, polite, and listened and discussed all of the issues with me. So please let’s get back on the subject of defending our candidates and not accusing and name calling fellow bloggers "
Buck Safety wrote on Jun 21, 2008 7:41 PM:
I'm not afraid of Mark Gordon, nor, I think, is anyone else posting their opinions about him here on this forum, so please, stop thinking you're all that when you don't know what is Wyoming.. I DO agree with Larry S. about Gordon's tax stance. And that makes me think Gordon is really out-of-touch with regular Wyoming. We work for a living and we're tired of the rich trust-fund and newbies to our state getting a HUGE break on their taxes while we pay for a war none of us wanted -nor was it necessary and the high cost of gas that cuts into our quality of life. Your man Gordon is promoting 2 more years of Bush Jr and we can't be having that. We're maxed out. Gordon is another CUBIN, plain and simple. "
Timmothy Schmidt wrote on Jun 22, 2008 1:05 AM:
As a Republican who do you suggest I vote for? Plain and simple question who else should I support? "
Try This wrote on Jun 22, 2008 3:16 PM:
Go ahead, vote for Capt. Winney. He's a very intelligent, very accomplished man and he would make a fine Congressman.
He'll also trounce Trauner in the general election. But so will Cynthia Lummis if she wins the primary. Mark Gordon is by far the weakest candidate of the three.
To answer Timmothy Schmidt's question: Cynthia Lummis is the BEST Republican candidate for Congress. The only thing she has in common with Barbara Cubin is that they are both women and both former state legislators. The similarities end there. "
Democrat Strategy wrote on Jun 24, 2008 11:00 AM:
About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years earlier:
"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a
permanent form of government." A democracy will continue to exist up
until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous
gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a
dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the following sequence:
1. From bondage to spiritual faith
2. From spiritual faith to great courage
3. From courage to liberty
4.From liberty to abundance
5. From abundance to complacency
6. From complacency to apathy
7. From apathy to dependence
8. From dependence back into bondage
Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law, St. Paul,
Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 Presidential election:
Number of States won by: Gore 19, Bush 29
Square miles of land won by: Gore 580,000, Bush: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Gore 127 million, Bush: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by Gore: 13.2, Bush:
2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the tax paying citizens of this great country. Gore's territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of
governmentwelfare." Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the complacency and apathy phase of professor Tyler's definition
of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already
having reached the "governmental dependency" phase. If Congress grants
amnesty and citizenship to twelve million criminal invaders called illegal aliens (aka undocumented migrants or immigrants euphemistically) and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years. Apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom. "
Brandon wrote on Jun 29, 2008 2:32 PM:
Timmothy Schmidt wrote on Jul 7, 2008 6:40 PM:
Submit a Comment