HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Divert dollars from savings? Millions could be shifted to highways, state treasurer suggests


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


CHEYENNE -- A growing amount of money that will flow into the $4 billion Wyoming Permanent Mineral Trust Fund under current policy could be shifted for other purposes, Treasurer Joe Meyer says.

In a letter last week to the heads of the Legislature's Select Committee on Capital Financing and Investments and the co-chairmen of the Joint Appropriations Committee, Meyer said $165 million in additional dollars is destined to be moved from the state's General Fund to the Permanent Mineral Trust Fund under the Legislature's spending policy.

For fiscal year 2008, an additional $560 million will go into the trust fund corpus, compared with $355.9 million last year.

The corpus has increased by 450 percent since fiscal year 2002, Meyer reported.

"Given current difficulties in funding increasing costs of maintaining county roads and state highways, some of the general fund earmarking to corpus could easily be shifted to the state highway and county road funds to address those problems if only the current operation of the spending policy reserve account were made more transparent and consciously," Meyer wrote.

In an interview, he said the state has $102 million in a reserve fund that the Legislature probably no longer needs.

Meyer noted the difficulty in projecting income.

In January, the treasurer's office projected the amount of General Fund dollars going into the Permanent Mineral Trust Fund corpus would be $122 million. As of June 13, the amount appears to be $165.6 million.

Reaction was mixed to Meyer's suggestion.

Senate President John Schiffer, R-Kaycee, and Sen. Jayne Mockler, D-Cheyenne, said they could support spending some of the money rather than moving it into the inviolate Permanent Mineral Trust Fund.

Senate Majority Leader John Hines, R-Gillette, and Sen. Phil Nicholas, R-Laramie, a co-chairman of the Joint Appropriations Committee, opposed any deviation from the Legislature's spending policy.

Schiffer said that since the money came from one-time capital gains, it should be spent on one-time needs.

"One that comes to mind is the wildlife trust fund, to help bring it closer to the goal of $200 million, he said.

The state could use the income from the fund to offset the impact of mineral development on wildlife, including sage grouse.

Road repair, on the other hand, is going to be an ongoing expense.

Schiffer also pointed out that the $200 million the Legislature allocated this year for highways is now a permanent part of the Wyoming Department of Transportation's standard budget.

Schiffer said his other preference would be to add another $5 million to the Wyoming Military Department's military assistance fund to help families of National Guard and active military.

Mockler noted that when the state was poor, legislators promised the people they would fix the state social systems and infrastructure when the money came in.

She said she is in favor of repairing the infrastructure today with the additional money rather than using it to grow the fund faster for a better return.

Nicholas said this is the second or third time Meyer has pointed out the amount of the spillover and the need to spend money on highways.

But with 80 percent of the state budget paid from mineral industry revenues, the only way to protect the state from a downturn is to grow the Permanent Mineral Trust Fund, Nicholas said.

The state is a long way off from the day when income from the fund can be enough to make up for lost mineral revenue, he added.

"There's really no reason to revisit the spending policy we set in statute,' Nicholas said. "I think most people, and I'm one of them, are resistant to diverting from our long-term plan.

State General Fund spending, he said, is growing at a faster rate than the growth of the Permanent Mineral Trust Fund.

Nicholas said he doesn't even like Meyer's idea of changing the date the money is credited to the corpus of the fund from July to January.

Meyer said the move would allow everyone involved to be aware of the revenues in conjunction with budget requests and revenue estimates.

Nicholas said he believes the legislators understood this is what was going to happen with the corpus of the Permanent Mineral Trust Fund.

Contact Joan Barron at joan.barron@trib.com or by phone at 307-632-1244.




Previous   Next
Sublette official blasts feds   Judge tosses water lawsuit

Article Rating

Current Rating: 3 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 10 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Dj McMenus wrote on Jun 23, 2008 9:38 AM:

" GOOD! We need better roads. "

Long View wrote on Jun 23, 2008 12:15 PM:

" Not so fast spendthrifts.

The growth of the Permanent Mineral Trust Fund is crucial to our future.

While we have the revenue coming in we should grow the trust as large as we can during these good times fo the state.

This trust will smooth-out the low points in revenue, and like always, those low points will come and we will require that money to get by.

We have more than adequate funding of current needs and we do not need to rob from the future to pay for them now.

The people that would steal from the trust are they same types that would cash in their IRA to pay for a new car when the old one still runs fine. Idiots! "

Aaron wrote on Jun 23, 2008 12:39 PM:

" No way! Diverting money away that should go into the trust is short sighted and a bad plan. That trust is our state wide insurance policy against bad times. Just as you should pump your retirement accounts up in good times, we should be pumping up the trust now so we're ready for the bad times. "

Nancy wrote on Jun 23, 2008 12:58 PM:

" This kind of thinking is exactly how Social Security got fouled up. Don't do it! "

Freeze-Thaw wrote on Jun 23, 2008 1:16 PM:

" Let the roads go to hell. Maybe some of these roughneck confederate traitors will slow down.... or go back to Texas where they belong. "

BornInTheUSA wrote on Jun 23, 2008 3:05 PM:

" I agree with the cheapskates, no money should go into road maintenance. Who needs a dashboard on their vehicle anyway.

Except my road of course.

Every year the county blades the road and sprays down some metal eating liquid and within a day or two the washboard and potholes are back only now they feel like they're made of concrete. "

Mary wrote on Jun 23, 2008 4:49 PM:

" This is a bad idea and it defeats the purpose of the revnue stream going into the trust. We need to fatten up the trust now while things are good because they will not always be that way. The highways are now fully funded and work is getting done just fine. "

Marion wrote on Jun 24, 2008 6:13 AM:

" How come property taxes were raised so dramatically if the state suddenly has so much money to get rid of.
WYDOT can always think of some way to blow more money.
The fund was set up to keep spendthrifts form thinking of new ways to buy elections during time of plenty, leave it that way. "

Hillsdale wrote on Jun 24, 2008 12:12 PM:

" For what it is worth, appropriate infrastructure investments, when directed toward infrastructure that effectively enhances economic capacity, might be a more effective means of insulating the State's tax revenue flow against a downturn in mineral royalties. I would caution, however, against mere maintenance of side roads. Building the critical four-lane divided highway segments might be the best use of this money without eroding the State's long-term revenue projections. "

Common Cents wrote on Jun 25, 2008 10:39 AM:

" The trust fund is nothing more than a way to convert a depleting mineral resource into a permanent financial resource. It should be treated like an endowment: Managed with an investment and spending policy that preserves fully the inflation-adjusted value of what goes into it. Everywhere, elected officials are tempted to raid such funds for current expenditures (such as road maintenance) or infrastructure investment that doesn't meet a rigorous cost-benefit analysis. This is a very bad idea, and reinforces the destructive boom and bust mentality that Wyoming has found it so difficult to shake. Keep the money in the fund, invest it in a diversified portfolio for the long term, and meanwhile do everything possible to diversify the economy away from its near-total dependency on the energy sector. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.