HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Govs hear water warning


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


JACKSON -- Here’s the regional forecast for the 21st century:

More frequent, extended droughts in states including Wyoming, Colorado, Idaho and Montana. Less mountain water runoff throughout the Southwest, and increased flooding in California, Oregon and Washington.

Global climate change should lead to more precipitation on the planetary scale, but less water in the American West, a scientist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Monday.

Add expected, continued growth throughout the West, and water scarcity could prove the greatest crisis the region faces in the coming decades, said Brad Udall, director of the Western Water Assessment, a joint effort of the University of Colorado and NOAA.

Udall urged the Western Governors' Association to move as quickly as possible toward developing large-scale, regionwide water conservation plans, as the most viable way to avoid a serious water shortage crisis. Udall’s address kicked of the morning’s discussions at Teton Village here, on the second day of the annual governors' conference.

“We now know and have known for quite a while that climate change will fundamentally change the water supply,” Udall said. “If we want protect the values of the West that we all love, we have got to get serious about water conservation.”

Water conservation has a two-fold efficiency benefit, Udall told the gathering, because the production, purification, pumping, delivery and home heating of water uses enormous amounts of energy. If states and municipalities can reduce their water consumption levels, they’ll also significantly reduce overall energy consumption, he said.

A couple of emerging technologies could help create new sources of fresh water -- including desalinization and purification systems that allow water to be reused locally -- but the best, most achievable and effective way people can increase water supplies is to stop wasting so much, Udall told the governors.

Even though people who aren’t growing crops need only about a gallon of water a day, per individual, to survive, non-farming citizens in the West use, on average, 150 gallons of water per person per day, he said.

One of the primary reasons for this level of consumption, Udall said, is that water is simply too cheap, and the price is not in line with the value of the resource.

While a significant portion of the per-capita water consumption occurs inside homes, a larger portion is used outdoors, for such things as watering the lawn and washing cars.

Duane Smith, executive director of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, told the governors that fundamental changes need to me made to the mission statements of several federal agencies, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, in order to make it a priority for these federal agencies to work with states on their water plans.

Currently all federal involvement and planning is done on a project-by-project basis, with no thought to the overall water picture, he said.

Smith urged the governors to push for Congress to make the necessary changes on the federal level.

“We believe this is critically important to the Western states,” Smith said. “We’re going to change the way the federal government interacts with the states.”

Smith helped write the report, which the governors unanimously adopted, titled "Water Needs and Strategies for a Sustainable Future." The report calls for improved collaboration among the states and the federal government on water policy, and offers strategies for regionwide planning.

In a discussion following presentations on the report, Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter said the challenges of the West’s scarce water supply have been ignored for “far too long.”

The region needs, among other things, a better understanding of the total water inventory available, and scientists need to get a better handle on the relationship between streams, runoff and groundwater, Otter said.

“We’ve got to know what we have in order to know if we can sustain that growth,” Otter said.

Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman said water is “the issue of the decade” in his state, as it, like other states, has faced “historic drought.”

Otter agreed with the panelists that the “lowest-hanging fruit” in the water shortage crisis is conservation, but also called for an expanded infrastructure for water development, including increasing the heights of dams wherever possible.

“It fell to all of us as we became governors to be in the position to decide how to divide up scarcity," he said.

Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal noted that water conservation makes a lot of sense, but implementing conservation plans on the state and local level can be a struggle, because water policy is based on a historical premise of utilization, rather than conservation.

The challenge, both Freudenthal and Udall noted, is that in order to shift toward water conservation throughout the West, there will have to be a fundamental shift in perceptions about water.

The historical legal framework for water use in states such as Idaho and Wyoming required farmers to use all of the water they were allotted or lose some of that allotment in the future.


Previous   Next
Govs eye national energy role   Scientists track toads with tiny transceivers

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 34 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

wyoslick wrote on Jul 1, 2008 4:33 AM:

" Water conservation may be the “lowest-hanging fruit”, but it isn't going to happen on a voluntary basis. The economic lesson we refuse to learn is the only effective curb on demand is price. Raise the price of water, and I will guarantee demand will fall.

To accomplish lower demand with price doen't have to be Draconian. All new houses should have two water meters installed. One meters basic household use, sink taps, showers and toilets, and the other meters outside taps and underground sprinkling systems. Water on the outside taps should be 10x more expensive than water for inside domestic use. Lake County, IN uses a system similar to this. "

BULL wrote on Jul 1, 2008 8:32 AM:

" Limit devlopment of massive subdivisions. Regulate housing , there are lots of things that could help the water issue if people can just get the greedy real estaters , bankers and county commissioners out of the same bed. "

Drue D wrote on Jul 1, 2008 10:30 AM:

" Why doesn't Wyoming own the water that runs out of this state? Let's start at the apropriate level......... "

Climate Watcher wrote on Jul 1, 2008 10:35 AM:

" "Global climate change" is simply a matter of politics.

Notice how often the word "green" has started to show up in ads?

Nobody knows how much snow and rain we will get in the future. Nobody.

Anybody who believes these "experts" is being taken for a ride. "

Bottom-line wrote on Jul 1, 2008 12:40 PM:

" Global climate change or not, our resources are tested now across much of the west and as the population expands and more people flee the cities we are going to run out of water if we do not create a growth control plan now and act on it soon. Bottom-line: to many people and to much development. "

Dennis wrote on Jul 1, 2008 12:46 PM:

" The halcyon days of plenty are now just about behind us with respect to natural resources of the west. We cannot ignore growth and rapidly expanding populations any longer. We have to set in place economic and social controls or our day is done down the road. "

Ivan wrote on Jul 1, 2008 12:52 PM:

" The climate may be changing on this planet as it has been since the beginning. Whether it is man made or man is contributing to that in measurable amounts remains in question. More people moving to Wyoming and build houses where none belong is a fact, just as the matter of these new immigrants are consuming more and more water. We have to curb growth or we will be up a (dry) creek without a paddle. Making people save water is important, but slowing growth to reasonable levels, or going to a zero growth policy is what will save the day or at the least push it to the right on the calendar some. "

Sunshine wrote on Jul 1, 2008 1:48 PM:

" No news here. We have always been scarce on water in the west. More people coming faster and faster won't help that any. Climate change, if it is happening, and if it happens as the chicken little crowd tells us it will, won't help any either. Time for some other changes too I suppose like controlled growth, limited building/development and zoning. Too many rats in the Skinner box all after the same limited cheese. "

Krutchfield wrote on Jul 1, 2008 2:07 PM:

" Ivan and company, you have hit the nail on its head. Climate change or not, we're growining too fast and using way to much water for what the state has in natural resources. "

Manny wrote on Jul 1, 2008 3:02 PM:

" Yes, we all know we need to reduce water waste by being water use efficient....but, federal and state politicians must be responsible to see the fact that we need to increase water storage and suplies to avoid a water crisis in the near future.

The fact is that climatic changes will continue to result in diminishing water supplies and there is a need to add storage capacity in all water systems across the country to be able to have a reliable water supply to meet the needs of our communities.

Water conservation is a way of living, but increased water storage facilities is a necessity if we want to survive climate change. "

Carolyn W wrote on Jul 1, 2008 7:30 PM:

" Face it folks. Climate change is for real. Fresh water world wide is more valuable than any coal or oil or gas. It is also a super BAD idea to think about damming it all. ecosystems matter not simply for wildlife but for human life. Lawns are stupid as are coal to liquid plants and any form of coal development. All of it costs water. "

Albany Mountain wrote on Jul 1, 2008 7:33 PM:

" Next time, drive the point home and have the "conference" on Skull Creek in the Red Desert. "

Martin wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:16 PM:

" Slowing growth is one part of the answer for Wyoming and the rest of the west. Increasing storage is also part of the solution. We cannot keep developing as we have been in recent times, the land will not bear that additional pressure. "

Sandi wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:57 PM:

" In the 1970's these folks were telling us that a new ice age was coming. Now, many of the very same people (look it up) are telling us that were all going to drown due to the exact opposite, global warming. Recent trend data is pointing at the fact that the oceans are all cooling and this year alone wiped out the decade long increases in temperature. Now one study shows Wyoming getting more precipitation and another one less rain fall. So, come on folks, which will it be? We cannot run around like Chicken Little endlessly preparing for all possible maladies. I do agree, we do not have enough water resources for continued growth at the rate we are growing. We need to slow maybe even have a moratorium on development for say 10-20 years and we need more storage too. What we don't need is made up panic and phony crisis that serve anyone's political agenda. "

Mit wrote on Jul 3, 2008 1:21 PM:

" SHUT DOWN THE DEVELOPERS AND BUILD MORE STORAGE. DUH! "

Julie wrote on Jul 3, 2008 1:27 PM:

" Carolyn W ,

Do you use plastic products? Man made medicines? Fuel in any form? Live in a house and use roads? Do you throw away anything that is not 100% biodegradable (don't forget ladies hygiene products used monthly)?

If so, then you too, are by your very own standards, stupid.

Off to the cave with you! NOW!

Can you see how effective name calling is and demanding action based on it? "

problem solved wrote on Jul 3, 2008 2:08 PM:

" slow the growth, impose some common-sense zoning and increase storage capacity. Problem solved. "

Dr. Water wrote on Jul 3, 2008 2:23 PM:

" We are already running out of space and resources and few seem to understand that fact. Wyoming cannot support the human density that other areas can. Water is a symptom of a greater problem. Let's treat the problem and not the symptom alone. Blowing your nose treats a symptom but doesn't get ride of the flu. "

Shelli wrote on Jul 3, 2008 2:45 PM:

" It is heartening to read that so many other folks feel as I do that we are outstripping our resources becuase of a burgeoning population due to over development that needs to be controlled. Now, write your elected officials at all levels and let's get this under control before we become the next tax-i-fornia filled with fruits and nuts. "

Ryan wrote on Jul 3, 2008 3:12 PM:

" Low volume toilets and zero scapping yards will only do so much to save water. More importantly, I fail to see how you can ask the people that live here now to save water and scrimp at the same time that their issuing building permits for new tracts of homes on a daily basis. If we are in a bind now and will be more so tomorrow, how smart is it to keep building? "

Kim wrote on Jul 3, 2008 3:20 PM:

" Stop building more new ranchettes out in pastures. That's a good start. "

Mike wrote on Jul 3, 2008 3:41 PM:

" I am no eco freak from New Jersey or Kommiefornia. I am an outdoorsman and I live in Wyoming. But I also have to agree that we are building to much and to fast and in places we have no business developing. Global warming or not, we just don't have the water or much of anything else here to support more people and all of the businesses these people will then need to support them like stores, gas stations and of course bigger businesses to employ all of them. "

Vaugn wrote on Jul 3, 2008 3:48 PM:

" When the seas rise high enough we can then build some plants to make drinking water from it if the Al Gore pack of liars dreams so come true. "

No Right Answers wrote on Jul 3, 2008 4:05 PM:

" I am sure that whatever it is that we do to try and solve this problem the environmental nazi's will all sue against it. If we slow growth we'll be denying others a right to build. If we build more water storage we'll be drowning some bug. If we enact zoning we'll be denying freedom of expression. If we do nothing we will be denying global warming. You cannot make these people happy with anything unless you become one of them. Then everything you say and so is golden and should be passed into law. "

Schooled wrote on Jul 5, 2008 6:09 PM:

" That's xeriscaping, not zero-scaping.
Too much, not to much.
Notwithstanding the efforts of ExxonMobile and paid shills that work only to cast doubt on global warming, it is real, it is here and we'd best starting treating water as the valuable resource it is.
As for "Climate Watcher," see what odds you get in Vegas that we'll have more snow in the 21st century, rather than less, or more rapidly melting snowpacks. "

Geri wrote on Jul 8, 2008 9:41 AM:

" This is a timely piece that we all must consider. Not due to the "invention" of global warming, but because we are growing at an unsustainable rate and we do not have the resources or the need to do so. Act. Write your elected officials and express your ideas to them. "

Land Scaper wrote on Jul 8, 2008 9:44 AM:

" Schooled; ZERO-SCAPING = land scaping which requires zero human provided water to maintain it's apperance and value. "

Dorthy wrote on Jul 8, 2008 11:47 AM:

" Times and the world are both changing. They always have been. The planet is no longer "wide open" and neither is Wyoming. We have got to control growth and plan for it intelligently or we'll be out of schlitz in short order. "

Zel wrote on Jul 8, 2008 2:22 PM:

" Growth is the real problem. Maybe we should adopt some zoning laws based on the lands ability to carry as projected over time?

Stopping the issuance of building permits in specific areas is a no brainer. Getting ride of outfits like RMTL's that are chopping up the state into ranchett sized parcels is another no brainer.

Can't we leave some areas open and wild for the hope of Pete? "

Stephanie wrote on Jul 8, 2008 5:35 PM:

" Fine. They heard it. Will they act on it, and before it is too late and the state is over run with tracts of new subdivisions full of demanding outsiders that all want Wyoming to be California? "

jkmac wrote on Jul 19, 2008 4:07 PM:

" Schooled. Is that as in a school of fish, a group (school) of lemmings or are you one of the sheep that prays to the hypocrit Algore as he preys on the gullible. "

barnun wrote on Jul 23, 2008 11:04 AM:

" First, no one seems to take into account that we have to send our water to nebraska, who now uses it to make ethanol. we are devoting our food and water to ethanol which by the way, also takes about 1.2 gallons of gas to put 1 gallon of ethonal in the local pump.
also, if we are talking about the west overall, no one talks about california's massive drain on the hoover dam. they should be forced to build a desalinization plant ... or 3. slowing state growth down does not reduce the number of people in the US that consume water. what about the 14 million illegal immigrants ? there's a few gallons of water "

john wrote on Jul 26, 2008 7:19 AM:

" Fewer golf courses, glorious parks and big lawns "

podman wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:13 PM:

" Climate change is real and will have differing effects in different locals. As an example: Northern Europe is in danger of a mini ice age and the western US is drying out/getting warmer. The 60's hippies didn't have the science available today so it's easy to discount their doomsday rantings. Much is still to be learned.

Many here blame developers and density, as have I, while our neighbors cash out by subdividing arable land into "ranchettes".

What's the real problem? Too many people on the planet. Period. 50 years ago we had 3Bil people. Now we're approaching 7Bil! If you haven't reproduced - DON'T. Overpopulation is the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.