Prosecutors charged a homeless man Monday with murder in connection with the stabbing of a former Marine.
A Casper man and a teenager, meanwhile, face charges of aiding and abetting murder in the death of Johnny Shane Moody, a father of four who was found Friday night on the 700 block of East A Street with apparent stab wounds to the heart and back.
Witnesses told police several men assaulted Moody near the area where he was found, according to an affidavit signed by Casper police detective Stacia Francisco. One witness said a man, later identified as Jeffery Lee Carter, made a motion toward Moody, who then grabbed at his chest and appeared to be bleeding.
Carter, who is accused of second-degree murder, was found hiding in some bushes shortly after the stabbing. Police say they found two lighters and a folding knife in the area.
The 16-year-old boy, Juan Carlos Diaz, told a detective Carter stabbed Moody, according to the affidavit. Diaz and another man, 21-year-old Jonathan Jermain Jelsma, told police they participated in Moody's assault.
Both men are charged with aiding and abetting second-degree murder.
Jelsma told police the assault took place after Moody was involved in a physical confrontation with a woman, where each person punched the other. Francisco's affidavit did not offer further details about the confrontation.
Several people fled when a police lieutenant arrived in the area just after 10 p.m. on Friday. The lieutenant followed Moody down an alley and found him partially under a vehicle. Moody was taken to Wyoming Medical Center, where he was pronounced dead.
In an interview with investigators, Carter denied knowing anything about the incident, according to the affidavit. Police say he had blood on his shirt and shorts, and what appeared to be blood on his hands.
On Monday afternoon, Carter, Jelsma and Diaz made their first appearance in Natrona County Circuit Court. If convicted, all three would face 20 years to life behind bars.
Diaz appeared confused when Judge Michael Huber asked whether he understood the charges against him.
"I didn't really hurt that guy," he told the judge.
When the judge began to read the detective's affidavit out loud, he was interrupted by Diaz.
"Do you know who stabbed the guy?" Diaz asked.
In contrast, Carter spoke only to answer procedural questions from the judge. He told the court he was homeless and had come to Casper from Atlanta.
Carter, appearing in court wearing shackles and a green jail uniform, asked for a court-appointed attorney. His bond was set at $500,000.
Prosecutors said Carter had felony convictions in other states.
Jelsma told the court he has been in Casper for seven to eight years. Prosecutors say he has several misdemeanor arrests and was on the verge of having his probation revoked.
When asked by Huber if he had anything to say about his bond, Jelsma said he would like to get out of jail and make his life better. The judge set his bond at $250,000.
Huber set Diaz's bond at $100,000.
Funeral arrangements for Moody are pending.
Reach crime reporter Joshua Wolfson at (307) 266-0582 or at josh.wolfson@trib.com.
Reader Comments
Comments to this story.
carry wrote on Jul 22, 2008 7:39 AM:
Biting ears off and stabbing folks must be weekend entertainment now? "
april wrote on Jul 22, 2008 8:36 AM:
Tyler F wrote on Jul 22, 2008 10:18 AM:
AmP wrote on Jul 22, 2008 11:47 AM:
i hope these mens get Prision time big time!!
RIP to Mr. Moody. "
NotGonnaTakeIt wrote on Jul 22, 2008 12:59 PM:
CAT wrote on Jul 22, 2008 1:23 PM:
martyk wrote on Jul 22, 2008 2:44 PM:
action_needed wrote on Jul 22, 2008 5:17 PM:
Bennie K. wrote on Jul 22, 2008 8:27 PM:
old friend wrote on Jul 23, 2008 9:53 AM:
Kaylee wrote on Jul 24, 2008 3:45 PM:
Unbelievable wrote on Jul 24, 2008 8:18 PM:
nfnvet wrote on Jul 25, 2008 4:55 PM:
zach wrote on Jul 25, 2008 9:52 PM:
Justice wrote on Jul 26, 2008 1:51 PM:
TomT wrote on Jul 26, 2008 8:37 PM:
OpenCarry wrote on Jul 27, 2008 11:22 AM:
For The Love of God wrote on Jul 28, 2008 12:05 AM:
If you ask me, we should all carry guns hidden in our pants or coats! Then there wouldn't be any crime at all! I also think that life imprisonment isn't nearly enough punishment for anything! Let's put some heads on some posts at the city entrances, and the state borders at that! And if an innocent person ends up on a post from time to time it's for the greater good. Learn to take one for the team! Show people what happens if you commit second degree murder. That'd teach 'em!
You've got to be kidding me. "
Exactly wrote on Jul 28, 2008 8:48 AM:
Juan wrote on Jul 28, 2008 12:27 PM:
Harmony wrote on Jul 28, 2008 12:29 PM:
Marna wrote on Jul 28, 2008 1:08 PM:
Moonbeam wrote on Jul 28, 2008 3:42 PM:
The Reality wrote on Jul 28, 2008 7:58 PM:
A Bullets fired with the best of intentions, coming from a gun in "the right hands," can still accidentally find its way through a wall into the head of a sleeping child. Is that right? Should that innocent child (or any innocent person) be asked to take one for "the team?" Isn't the death of one innocent bystander one too many? And don't you dare try to tell me that you wouldn't all be calling for heads in that scenario!
Real life doesn't always have one of the happy endings that we've all come to expect. Sometimes accidents happen and the "good and just" citizen doesn't triumph over the "evil criminal." Sometimes the good man accidentally kills a child, father, mother, etc. And then what?
Lori,
In the end we're all dead. Do not tell me that the end is all that matters, and that the details (our lives) are merely trivial side notes. I'm certain you don't believe that. "
Steve wrote on Jul 28, 2008 9:58 PM:
There is no way you're implying what I think you are. Do you know the difference because between causation and correlation? I suggest you look into it before you form anymore opinions. I only wish you wouldn't have started thinking without this advice. "
Harmony wrote on Jul 29, 2008 11:08 AM:
Do the math.
Look at the break down of our US population by percentage.
Then look at the break down of the populations, by percentage in our criminal justice system currently.
These folks got there for a reason.
No one made them commit their crimes.
Is this profiling, ethnic or racial bias?
No more so than ID'ing a suspect by hair and eye color, they are human descriptors.
If blond haired blue eyed folks of Scandinavian descent were at the heart of the problem, would you then also protest?
We need to have the guts to ID problems and then work to solve them, not obfuscate the truth and hide behind PC cowardice.
If a group has not acculturated into American society for some reason, we must learn why and fix that failure.
In the mean time we must be honest in our attempts to promote public safety for the greater good.
All Americans deserve to live in safety, without fear and have a chance at making their own prosperity no matter who they are or from what back ground that came.
Fair is fair. The rules must apply evenly to all, all of the time regardless of race, creed, color, religion or immigration status. "
Steve wrote on Jul 29, 2008 3:22 PM:
You're argument is frustrating to me. You claim to be analysing the facts, but you are not looking at nearly enough information. You are only using the statistics that strengthen your shallow and incorrect conclusions. This isn't an issue of being politically correct. This is an issue of understanding why things happen. Did you ever think that poverty plays a role in who goes to jail? Do you think that a person is more likely to stay out of jail if he can afford an expensive criminal defense lawyer, instead of having to default to a court appointed attorney? Do you think there may be more factors than you're considering?
You are fundementally implying that being black, being a minority makes, makes a person more likely to commit a crime (I'm going to reduce my argument to being black vs being white to make my point). And I don't care what you say, that is what you're doing. This, is not at all correct. Being black does not predispose a person to be a criminal, and being white does not predispose a person to be a good law abiding citizen. What it may do, in some cases, is put a young person into a situation which makes taking part in criminal activity more or less likely. Or, more or less likely to be punished for his actions. Your statistics are not damning evidence. You are implying that a persons race, color, creed is what determines if a person will take part in criminal actvity. The issue isn't the blackness or whiteness, it's significantly more complicated than the pie chart break downs that compare color and incarceration rates.
Now, does this excuse that a person has committed a crime? No, not at all. Should people be held accountable for their crimes regardless of race, color, and creed equally? Absolutely. Is the justice system perfect? No. Is it flawed? Yes. Do I wish that crime rates were lower? Of course. Do I think that certain areas and groups could be the target of projects to lower crime rate? Yes. But don't you dare imply that locking up minorities (or even those who are predisposed to commit crimes because of extenuating circumstances) will solve our problems.
If there anyone in this debate who obfuscates the truth, it is you, and those who agree with you.
Oh, and one final question. Would you sacrifice your family, your friends, your life for the greater good? I don't for a moment believe you would. The greater good is a concept that's significantly harder to support when things get personal, which they always are for somebody. "
Juan wrote on Jul 29, 2008 3:54 PM:
Brannigan wrote on Jul 29, 2008 4:07 PM:
victoria wrote on Jul 29, 2008 6:26 PM:
Steve wrote on Jul 29, 2008 9:07 PM:
TomT wrote on Jul 29, 2008 9:23 PM:
Silly libs... "
The Reality wrote on Jul 29, 2008 9:48 PM:
Do you really think a gun would have improved this situation!? In response to your criticism, do you really think the world would be a safer place if more people were walking around with concealed weapons? How could that possibly have a positive outcome? Also, be sure to note that a huge percentage of the population would have to carry concealed weapons to deter crime on any noteworthy level.
Also, you yourself are guilty of exactly what you accuse me of. Don't you think an innocent person getting randomly stabbed to death (note this is in no way a reference to Moody's situation) is pretty far flung. Do you think that carrying around a gun all the time is a reasonable response to the extremely low likelihood that you may get attacked at sometime in your life? Don't you think that there could possibly be some negative results (say accidents, or a flare in temper that results in a murder instead of a simple verbal or physical confrontation, or a simple misunderstanding, or say that alcohol comes into the picture) to carrying around a gun ALL the time? How is my situation anymore ridiculous than that? Come on man. How is that any less far flung? Seriously? You're level of paranoia is significant;y higher than mine.
Maybe it would be best if we didn't find our ways into situations where people want to stab us to death. Perhaps a gun isn't the situation. Possibly it's a lifestyle issue. Also, if you find yourself headed into a situation in which you decide to pack a personal protection hand gun maybe you should reconsider what you're about to do. But who am I to be advising you reasonable, calculated people. "
No Way wrote on Jul 29, 2008 10:11 PM:
And for the love of God, work on your points. You can do better than that. "
Rosalio wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:31 AM:
Lincoln wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:43 AM:
If you are male, Caucasian, Christian and working, you are a target and a victim.
The democrats are all after you and so are the many government programs set up by them.
Of course, if you stand up for your rights, you will be called a racist and made a public outcast.
Is this what America has come to? Is this what all of us really think is fair and want for our society? "
No Way wrote on Jul 30, 2008 12:32 PM:
I'm not going to be at all clever in my response. I'm just going to be blunt and tell you why you are wrong. You are still dealing with anomalies. Are there illegal immigrants that are committing crimes? Yes, of course there are. But I ask you, how many illegal immigrants do you think there are in this country? How many are committing crimes? To act as if all illegal immigrants are committing crimes (and don't give me any of that invader crap, I'm talking about robberies, burglaries, murders, rapes, drug smuggling, etc.) is ridiculous. To even act like the percentage of the illegal immigrant committing crimes is high is ridiculous. Do you think that those who are not breaking the law are drawing press coverage? Do we ever see headlines that say "15 million illegal immigrants have uneventful day at work, return home, have lite dinner, and go to sleep?" Do we hear the stories of the people who work here and lead uneventful law abiding lives? No! We only hear the completely ridiculous attention grabbing stories that get people fired up. I only say it one more time. The criminals are the anomaly, not the rule, and you are pretending that just the opposite is true. Pleas stop.
This is not an argument. This is a situation in which I have the facts and I am right. You are simply not. It's not debatable, it's not debatable. Be wrong all you like, but please don't promote your incorrect views and create more confusion in this difficult situation. "
Rosalio wrote on Jul 30, 2008 4:51 PM:
Juan wrote on Jul 30, 2008 5:20 PM:
The Reality wrote on Jul 30, 2008 7:38 PM:
I'm not going to address your argument on any meaningful level because you've decided not to address my points seriously. Instead you've decided to imagine reality in a completely abstract and ridiculous way.
I mean, just logistically speaking how is anything you're suggesting even remotely possible? How could we possibly arm all our citizens and ensure that they knew how to operate guns safely? It's simply irresponsible and silly to argue as you are now. You've decided to turn the world into some crazy gun toting utopia.
I agree that "law abiding, sane folks should be extended trust first in America." But I don't know that, that means that everyone who can theoretically own a gun should carry one at all times. And even if I did think that, there's no way that could happen. I mean Jesus Juan, you might as well be saying that the world would be a safer place if all cars had governors installed at the factory that made it impossible for anyone to ever drive over 5 mph.
There are a lot of things that would make the world a safer place that are completely impractical and just plain bad policy. Now this, my friend, is commonsense. "
Miss G wrote on Jul 31, 2008 2:29 AM:
Elle wrote on Jul 31, 2008 11:27 AM:
The Reality wrote on Jul 31, 2008 2:23 PM:
Did you even read our complete interaction? I feel that you're jumping to conclusions. Juan said, "the world would be a safer place if everyone that could legally own a firearm and carry it, did so." What I said was that logistically it's ridiculous to even suggest that as a realistic solution to crime. How could we possibly accomplish that as a society, as the human race? It's simply unrealistic and it's silly to pretend that it could happen. (And if anyone dare bring Switzerland into this I'm really going to lose it). "
No Way wrote on Jul 31, 2008 2:27 PM:
I like that you decided to take issues with the last few sentences of my post. I find it interesting that you didn’t address any of the content of my actually argument. My last section was nothing more than me being obnoxious. But you want to know what? I’m saying I’m right because I actually am right. I stand by it, but that wasn’t the point. Please consider what I’m actually saying if you want to keep talking. Oh, and just for the books, if I were interested in arguing about truth and affirmations of being correct I think that would get us a little off topic. And where for the love of God did you get your statistics? I think that best case scenario you are not understanding them properly, worst case scenario you just made them up. One more time my friend, Do we ever see headlines that say "15 million illegal immigrants have uneventful day at work, return home, have lite dinner, and go to sleep?" "
Yan wrote on Jul 31, 2008 3:26 PM:
No Way wrote on Jul 31, 2008 3:59 PM:
I don't even know where to begin with you. All I'm saying is that not all illegal immigrants are out committing crimes against humanity. That's all. I've even dared to say that number of illegal immigrants committing crimes is probably negligible.
Your point about blowing up a school is weak. How can we ensure that a born and raised American won't do that? How can we, as a society, ensure that you won't do that? How do we know that you're not a member of a radical Muslim sleeper cell with an elaborate cover story including the occasional star tribune comment? Hmm? "
Archer wrote on Jul 31, 2008 4:27 PM:
JOHN G. wrote on Aug 8, 2008 3:35 PM:
Submit a Comment