HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Authors research candidate's potential


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


Editor:

Obama impressed me so much the first time I saw him speak, what a graceful, well spoken man, I thought, and speaking for change! What a relief! That is something no American can argue with -- our government certainly needs to change their ways!

I eagerly read his books, "Dreams of My Father," and, "The Audacity of Hope." What a cool, inspiring title for a book. What a good writer!

However, being the voracious reader that I am -- and always ready and willing to hear both sides of the story -- I picked up another book. Not Jerome Corsi's book, "Obama Nation." I had the idea where he was going, considering what his book "Unfit for Command" did to John Kerry. No, not that author.

Obama can call Corsi a bigot and a liar if he likes. He has a bigger problem with an author from Columbia University who wrote "The Case Against Barack Obama," a very disturbing book.

In contrast, I read Hillary's "Living History," and the rebuttal, Morris' "Rewriting History" -- I still like Hillary. She is an admirable powerhouse of a woman. Obama though, who cares what color his skin is when he votes against a ban of "infanticide by neglect." Abortion is one thing. Murder of newborns is something completely different -- though some would argue it is the same thing.

Even Pelosi couldn't stomach that. That is only one disturbing issue. There are more. It is my opinion that the Democrats have made a huge mistake in their nominee. I want Hilary back.

ROBIN McDONALD, Bar Nunn


Previous   Next
Supply somehow misses demand   Freedoms die by small measures

Article Rating

Current Rating: 2.5 of 4 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 8 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

georgewashakie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:49 AM:

" This letter is a near perfect illustration of the perils of incomplete thinking. The writer does extensive research on the views of a candidate. The writer finds one source that appears to stand out in relation to the quantity of sources consulted. The writer finds one factual claim in this one source that enlightens him beyond all and any evidence he has examined.

Bummer! The statement about Senator Obama’s views on “infancide by neglect” is about as solid as the claim that Senator McCain cannot believe that “life begins at conception” because he has consistently supported stem cell research.

I was going to refer readers to Dave Fink’s quote from Buddha: “Question, question, question. . .”, but I found four different versions of it on the first two pages of a Google search.
Instead, I would suggest that one look at the discussion of the research behind this very topic in “The Case Against Barack Obama” at www. Mediamatters. And then, continue to question, question, question! "

BULL wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:22 AM:

" You cant always judge a book by its cover. This goes for the Republicans also. "

Flash wrote on Aug 21, 2008 12:52 PM:

" BULL, are you slipping? That almost sounds like you are cutting the Republicans some slack, too. "

joe one pack wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:10 PM:

" It is my opinion that the letter writer is an idiot. And I'm a democrat. "

BULL wrote on Aug 21, 2008 2:57 PM:

" Nah ..flash I aint slipping , and I sure dont cut any party any slack. Since I am an Independent , I can see both parties for what they are , instead of the fools with blinders on. I used to be a Republican , but I can no longer stand the party since the likes of Bush & Cheney have made a mess of it. "

flounder wrote on Aug 22, 2008 3:23 PM:

" I believe that you all should research what a "concern troll" is, and let me know if this letter is from one. "

kate wrote on Aug 23, 2008 11:11 AM:

" Good letter. Once you find out who obama is, and who he associates with, he becomes VERY UNATTRACTIVE.

These books are not smears, they are the truth about OBama. He's going to have to defend himself by doing something other than saying "these are smears". "

Hey Robin wrote on Aug 24, 2008 12:20 AM:

" Right Wing News says that Jerome Corsi is only credible about his own self-promotion and would write anything about anyone if it made him money. They also said this: "However, there is one enormous problem with Jerome Corsi: he's a habitually dishonest buffoon who will say absolutely anything to make a buck. Corsi, on the other hand, would probably write "Aliens in charge at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue" if he thought he could make a few bucks off it.

Keep in mind, folks, this is the same lunatic who has been running around for years telling people that George Bush is going to somehow personally merge the US, Canada, and Mexico over the objections of the American people and Congress. In other words: Jerome Corsi is a conspiracy nut whose credibility level is zero. "

So even though it is great that you read, you might want to check the history and credibility of the, for lack of a better term, author, so they don't scam you with lies. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.