HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

American energy for the American people


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


Gary Trauner

There has been a lot of posturing recently about the best way to secure America's energy future and, by extension, the strength of America's economy and leadership position in the world.

Since the day I started running for Wyoming's lone seat in the U.S. House, I have been saying that the search for sustainable energy independence is the issue of our time. It affects our national security, our economy, our environment and the legacy we leave to future generations.

First, I agree with President Bush, who said in his State of the Union Address in 2006, "Keeping America competitive requires affordable energy. Here we have a serious problem: America is addicted to oil."

Here are a couple of interesting facts, which no one disputes:

-- Even if we drill everywhere we can, including Alaska and the Outer Continental Shelf, we will still have only 3 percent of the world's oil reserves. The remaining 97 percent is found mainly in countries ruled by dictators who are not exactly friends of the United States.

-- Oil production in the U.S. peaked in the mid-1970s -- yes, nearly 35 years ago. And that was before we opened Prudhoe Bay in Alaska and most of the offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. Even with such efforts, we have gone from producing over 8 million barrels per day to under 5 million barrels per day while imports have increased from roughly 30 percent to over 70 percent.

As a businessman, I look at the return on our investment to America's future from any steps we take regarding energy. The Energy Information Administration estimates that even if we drill in ANWR, gas prices may go down by a few pennies in the next 15 years or so, while oil imports continue to increase; no business would make an investment with such a minimal return.

Do we need to continue responsible drilling for existing fuel sources while we put together an Apollo-moon type project for diversified energy independence? Yes! But here's another interesting fact: according to the Energy Department, U.S. exports of finished petroleum products, including gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel, soared to 1.592 million barrels per day in May 2008, an increase of 31 percent from one year ago. That's right: Nearly a third of the total of 5 million barrels per day of oil we drill and refine here is shipped overseas.

So if we are really serious about bringing down gas prices, I've got a new slogan: "American Energy for the American People -- Drill Here. Sell Here. Now." I am willing to support legislation to drill in areas not yet open for leasing with the following provisions:

1. Make oil and gas companies either drill on existing leases in a reasonable period of time (just like we require of coal companies) or give them up so we can find companies that will.

2. Sell all petroleum products from drilling in areas currently off limits solely in the American marketplace -- no more cries for independence from foreign oil while shipping American oil overseas.

3. Finally, any legislation must also include a comprehensive package for energy independence, including cracking down on speculation, increased research and development funding, tax incentives to industry for alternative fuels (including clean-coal technologies), tax credits to encourage efficiency in vehicles and appliances, aiding in the increase of transmission capability, and an immediate raise of fuel economy standards.

In summary, the following is from an article in the Casper Star-Tribune on June 15: "Looking to the next year, Charles F. Mason, the H.A. 'Dave' True Jr. professor of petroleum and natural gas economics at the University of Wyoming, said the notion that the nation could simply drill more wells to become 'independent' of foreign oil imports simply isn't realistic. 'It's a myth,' Mason said."

In the same article, Professor Mason summed it up very well: "It's a great place to make a stand if a politician is up for re-election. But realistically, I don't see that as having a significant impact," he said.

My plan will have a significant impact. First, we immediately relieve the pain at the pump by bringing down gas prices. Next, we ensure jobs and a strong economy here in Wyoming as we drill responsibly and consume domestically. Finally, we give our young people the opportunity to stay home and have some of the best jobs in the world by developing the untapped and nearly unlimited potential of clean coal, wind, solar and other new energy technologies here in Wyoming.

The very future of our nation is at stake. Countries that hold the keys to the new energy technologies of the future will be the world leaders of the future. We need leadership and vision to achieve our goal of energy independence, along with a firm and lasting commitment to developing new sources of cleaner energy, and to doing it right. I am in complete agreement with Professor Mason -- the last thing we can afford is cheap political pandering. Unless, of course, we find some way to convert that hot air into energy!

Gary Trauner of Wilson is the Democratic nominee for Wyoming's U.S. House seat.


Previous   Next
Cavalier Congress belies less crucial times   The less you have, the less you have to lose

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 6 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

oldtimer wrote on Aug 30, 2008 5:44 AM:

" First of all Mr. Trauner, you need to lean the basics. Not all leases have oil on them. You seem to be suggesting that oil companies be required to drill on leases included in a package they have bid on on even if their geologists tell them there is likely no oil there. What would that accomplish except to make getting oil more expensive? Dry holes happen even so.
When you mention the 3%, I think you are forgetting the newly discovered field in ND, and the oil shale in our state and Colorado and Utah. Perhaps a little reading or studying would help fill in the blanks for you.
Could you give us a list of your accomplishments? We do not even know what you do for a living, other than being an entrepreneur. What kind of business do you run that would qualify you to represent us? That would be a good place to start, then do some reading and even talk to the oil and gas commission about oil leases and to oil companies about how they decide where to drill. Just an idea. "

Geezer wrote on Aug 30, 2008 1:06 PM:

" He's right. Just shoveling more leases out the door hasn't worked. BLM has tried that for several years. All it has done is add to the industry's stockpile of undrilled leases. "

Whose pocket wrote on Aug 30, 2008 1:37 PM:

" This editorial makes the case against the Republicans being in the pocket of Big Oil. According to Gary, people in the U.S. don't have that much control. But it does show we darn well better send someone back to Washington DC who understands economics. Go Cynthia! "

georgewashakie wrote on Aug 30, 2008 4:18 PM:

" Understanding economics--is that expecting natural gas prices for Wyoming consumers to go down when the production of natural gas in Wyoming increases? "

WestWyo wrote on Sep 1, 2008 5:28 PM:

" Trauner at least has a plan. He is right on about keeping U.S. energy here. I would like to know the clones plan; I suppose she will let us know as soon as the GOP tells her what it is. "

Tutsie wrote on Sep 1, 2008 10:20 PM:

" My,my. LumScum is out in full force once again. VOTE GARY TRAUNER IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. You should know to vote for Trauner and get Lummis out of her career-politician status in '08. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.