HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Interest compounds by the second


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


Editor:

This is a short rebuttal to the letter written by Nick Mandis in the Casper Star-Tribune on Aug. 24th. Mr. Mandis states that the Bush tax cuts helped me receive a rather large increase in my income and that the reduced tax cuts were because of the Bush tax cuts. Two things for Mr. Mandis:

First, Bush had absolutely nothing to do with my increased income. It was generated by the collective bargaining process between my union and the company I work for. I am sure that Bush would be shocked to learn that he may have given a union man a pay raise since he is so anti-labor.

Second, if he would bother to look, Mr. Mandis would find that the national debt today stands at $9,650,000,000,000 (that's trillion). When Bush took office the national debt stood at about $5.7 trillion. It is projected that the debt will be at $10 trillion when Bush finally leaves office, that is an increase of more than $4 trillion.

Mr. Mandis thinks I should be grateful and not complain about the couple of dollars I get from a tax cut. Well, I am not grateful but ashamed that we as Americans would rather have a few more dollars now and have our grandchildren inherit this huge debt, but that is the Republican way.

In the short time it took me to write this letter the national debt will have increased by $10 million, so enjoy your tax cut and have a nice day.

RICH JAMES, Rawlins


Previous   Next
Fete welcomes new school year   Gumption finds the trail forward

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 3 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Sagebrush Sage wrote on Sep 1, 2008 9:32 AM:

" Seems I heard when Clinton left office the budjet was balanced. Even I can't call a $5.7 trillion debt a" balanced budjet" "

wyoslick wrote on Sep 2, 2008 3:15 AM:

" Nice move, Mr. James. Changing the subject is an effective method to avoid confronting a losing argument. As I recall, the issue was whether the Bush tax cut lowered your taxes, not whether or not it increased the federal debt.

On the debt issue, you may want to consider that tax revenues actually increased after the Bush tax cuts. The increased debt has more to do with the spending side of the ledger. "

TR wrote on Sep 3, 2008 12:40 PM:

" What Bush & Cheney have done to America will not be fixed in our lifetimes. The problem is the blatant blind idiots who refuse to admit it so they can toe the party line like so many hock sore sheep. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.