HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Rain, snow drench wildfires


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


LANDER -- Mother Nature has doused Wyoming's two major wildfires with rain and snow, reducing both to smolder through the underbrush, forest officials said Tuesday.

They warned, however, the return of hot, dry weather could reinvigorate the blazes. Both fires have been consuming beetle-killed trees in western Wyoming for more than a month.

Neither fire has been extinguished, but both have cooled tremendously and should stay calm for at least the next few days, representatives of the Shoshone and the Bridger-Teton national forests said.

And even though the Gunbarrel fire has cost the federal government nearly $10.5 million so far, officials are saying it has been economically valuable -- even cheap if one considers the ecological benefits.

The Gunbarrel fire, ignited by lightning on July 26, has burned almost 105 square miles of dead and fallen pine trees between Cody and Yellowstone National Park.

The New Fork Lakes blaze, caused by an out-of-control camp fire on July 29, has scorched more than 23 square miles of dead, dried-out trees, 19 miles north of Pinedale.

Wapiti District Ranger Terry Root said the Gunbarrel blaze consumed trees that "needed to be burned" west of Cody. The "decadent" timber was in the wilderness, and it couldn't be removed otherwise, he said.

"So burning is really our only option to recycle the forest," Root said. "We feel like it has actually been pretty good, economically -- actually pretty economically valuable. It comes out to about $153 an acre."

It costs the U.S. Forest Service about $300 per acre to perform fuel reduction projects regionally.

The result will be a 35-mile stretch of rejuvenated forest in the coming years, Root said.

"We lost no private residences, no structures, and we had no serious injuries. We're looking at it as a real success," he said.

Nearly an inch of precipitation drenched the blaze in some spots, and humidity levels went up as the temperatures dropped in recent days, Root said. All of these factors have combined to slow the fire down.

"There are no flare-ups today, it's just smoldering," he said Tuesday. "We may not even see any smoke today, or for a couple days, until the weather starts to warm up. But we could still have some fire growth after we get warmer and drier weather."

Mary Cernicek, spokeswoman for the Bridger-Teton National Forest, said about an inch of rain north of Pinedale has stopped the trees from igniting, but the New Fork Lakes fire is still creeping through the undergrowth.

"If the weather were to change, and things were to dry out, it could flare back up in the wilderness area," Cernicek said. "There is still a lot of beetle- and bug-killed timber there. But right now it's policing itself."

Firefighters will continue to make sure the blaze stays in the wilderness area, and will keep steering it toward the beetle-killed trees, she said.

"Until the storm hit this weekend, it was burning well enough that they had issued a temporary closure for some trails in the area. But with this wet weather, we have lifted the temporary closures," Cernicek said.

Because the New Fork Lakes fire has remained quite a bit smaller than the Gunbarrel blaze and has not posed as much of a threat to man-made structures, the total cost has been about $2 million, or less than 20 percent of the Gunbarrel fire's price tag.

Contact Chris Merrill at (307) 267-6722 or chris.merrill@trib.com


Previous   Next
Foundation to study nursing shortage   Wyoming briefs

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 3 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Dewd wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:51 AM:

" Lies, darn lies, and government statistics. The Wapiti District Ranger quotes this figure that the Gunbarrel Fire cost " only" $ 153 per acre to fight compared to $ 300 cost to Forest Service when they do prescribed burns. That's devious. When the FS puts a crew on a rpescribed burn , they manage the whole burn area usually . But 95 percent of the Gunbarrel Fire zone was not touched by the hand of man . So in actuality, the $ 10 million spent on Gunbarrel was implemented on maybe 5000 acres of ground.

That's $ 2000 per acre, more than ten time the government statistical average. You gotta be wary when the Forest Service starts throwing out numbers, folks.... wildfires cost a LOT ( ask Montana). "

Bob Zybach wrote on Sep 4, 2008 1:05 PM:

" To the Editor:

I am very interested in considering “the ecological benefits” of the Gunbarrel wildfire.

What are they? Are they worth more than $10 million?

Do the benefits outweigh the costs (Econ 101)?

Also: How do you “steer” a fire?

Finally: Shouldn’t news reporters be asking these types of questions before they go to press? "

old grouch wrote on Sep 5, 2008 3:21 PM:

" What a crock! Wapiti District Ranger Terry Root said the Gunbarrel blaze consumed trees that "needed to be burned" west of Cody. The "decadent" timber was in the wilderness, and it couldn't be removed otherwise, he said. This guy is more full of it than Bill Clinton. Go look at the burned area. No trees were consumed - none were removed. Much like the Yellowstone fire in '88, those trees will be there for another 50 - 100 years before they fall, and then another 100 or so before they rot.

As to Bob's question re the ecological benefits - FS spends $10MM "fighting" a fire they originally said they were going to let burn. How does that work? "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.