HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Behavior forfeits constitutional rights


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


Editor:

This is in response to "Inconsistency hits constitutional right" (letter, Aug. 31). First, Mr. Wood needs to learn that simply being charged with any crime removes none of one's constitutional rights. Aggravated assault is a felony, and yes, felons lose their Second Amendment rights.

In addition, the bill that went before the Supreme Court was for one-time offenders. Not for those who have offended two, or, say, five times. Mr. Wood asked that someone please explain to him the "logic behind this law." I'd be glad to.

When a protection order is issued against a person, that person is usually ordered to not be in possession of firearms for the duration of the protection order. It is only when that person proves no self-control by violating that protection order and is convicted of that protection order violation that any rights are then removed for life.

It is fitting that a person with this lack of self-control lose his right to be in possession of firearms.

Concerning his scenario of "Bob" and "Jim," they are two grown men and equals. "Jim" however is a bully, and bullies always pick on someone smaller and weaker than themselves, in this case his wife. Surely, Jim's wife has been abused verbally, mentally and emotionally before the physical violence started.

I'd also be willing to bet that there isn't a single citizen in the state of Wyoming who lost his Second Amendment rights for threatening or shoving his wife. Unfortunately, Mr. Wood is correct in his statement that a criminal can never be stopped from committing a gun crime if he really wants to.

That a piece of paper called a "Protection Order" (or FVPA order) cannot really stop an abuser from committing more violence against his victim. I am a staunch advocate of Second Amendment rights. But when a person commits certain crimes, they should no longer be protected under that right.

The incidence of domestic abuse in this state and especially in Casper is abominable. We should continue to educate our men against domestic abuse. Real change won't happen until we stand up and demand that our police, prosecutors and judges take this issue seriously, make arrests and hand down the kind of penalties these abusers truly deserve.

The time has come for our officials to start considering the victims' rights. Please go to www.donttouch.us to get more information or to become involved in this very worthwhile movement.

SARA GALARZA, Casper


Previous  
Hypersensitive protest to protest  

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 8 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 5 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Rachel Krueger wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:54 AM:

" I couldn't have said this better myself. "

al wrote on Sep 7, 2008 12:45 PM:

" sara says:
felons lose their Second Amendment rights.
Obviously so do non-felons, misdemeanors will get your rights stripped too.
But I am wondering, why only use losing 2nd amend. rights as a punishment, how about if we strip the first amendment rights of the press when they mislead, tell only one side of the story, or even mis-spell words? Take away their freedom of speech and freedom of press!!! Forever! "

Not Impressed by Ignorance wrote on Sep 10, 2008 5:17 PM:

" In that case half the people here would be stripped of their rights. Sounds constitutional to me. NOT! I am not impressed by your ignorance. "

Duality wrote on Sep 10, 2008 5:42 PM:

" WoW, so when are we going to be speaking chinese? With the attitude of sara, maybe sooner than we think. Thanks al for the good thought for the day. Good thing her and Rachel wont ever be in a governing role in what I refer to as, "The Free World", or at least for now. Good job Sara and Rachel for demonstrating your true loyalty to communisim and the late Stalin and Hitler attitude of "disagree, enemy of me,,,,, then we blindfold you and shoot you". "

Hippy wrote on Sep 14, 2008 1:18 PM:

" Duality - - no one wants to listen to your far left, hippy blab . . . seriously. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.