HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Most Wyomingites question global warming, poll shows


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


When former Salt Lake City mayor Rocky Anderson took his no-coal message to the Natrona County Commission recently, he easily roiled emotions.

"I do believe we need to be good stewards and I think we are, but some of the issues that I have with global warming advocates is that they always seem to direct all of their focus at coal and oil and gas, and that's what drives our state," Commissioner Matt Keating told Anderson.

The world's top scientists say human-caused CO2 is almost certainly a key factor in global warming. But that doesn't sit well in Wyoming, where coal mining contributed more than $734 million to the state's economy in 2005.

Keating said he believed the national discussion about global warming isn't honest. He's not alone in his suspicion. In fact, Wyoming has the largest percentage of voters among six Western states who doubt climate change.

A majority of Wyomingites -- 53 percent -- do not believe climate change is scientifically proven, according to a Mason-Dixon poll which surveyed 400 voters each in Wyoming, Colorado, Arizona, Nevada and Utah.

Yet 41 percent of Wyomingites believe the benefits of taking action regarding climate change are worth the economic investment.

Commissioner Barb Peryam said what irritated commissioners about Anderson's approach was an insistence that coal is evil and efforts to make it cleaner are insincere.

"I had to call him on the fact that he spoke in broad generalities, that it's unanimous that global warming exists and it's a tremendous problem," Peryam said. "That, to me, was unacceptable as broad and general statements. You can't pawn it off as unanimous agreement."

Many people in Wyoming believe the immediate impact of climate change is their jobs, given that so much of the state's economy relies on the development of coal, natural gas and oil.

"It's interesting that the majority would not believe (climate change is) real, but most would support investing in doing something about it," said Worth Christie, a retired insurance agent running for county commissioner as a Democrat. "We look at our skies and they are blue, and so people are reluctant to accept what doesn't appear to be affecting us at this point in time."

The poll shows Wyoming voters are split -- 41 percent to 41 percent -- about whether reacting to climate change is worth the investment. Christie said the general willingness to take some action might be evidence that Wyomingites realize that, despite their beliefs regarding climate change, the rest of the nation is demanding cleaner energy.

He said investments to make coal cleaner are wise "because it enhances the long-term marketability of the resources Wyoming possesses, whether it's coal, natural gas or wind."

Jim Huntington, 49, of Cheyenne said he feels bombarded by messages in the media that the earth's atmosphere is warming, and that man is to blame.

"I don't do scientific research by any means, I'm busy taking care of my family and working. But I don't see the other side being presented," he said.

Huntington said he's not convinced one way or the other on climate change, and he suspects that environmental advocates have an agenda.

"The issue here, I think, is this may be used as political and social leverage in order to bring about changes to our lifestyle, and this is the tool to achieve that goal," Huntington said.

Climate change is a political tightrope for elected officials, whether local, state or at the federal level. Many Wyoming politicians rely on the politically safe statement that global warming is now "political reality," and therefore it's safe to take action without committing to whether or not the science is proven.

Personal beliefs are more difficult to explain. The Mason-Dixon poll's finding that most Wyomingites are not convinced of climate change is perplexing for those who do accept the body of scientific evidence.

Journalist Jeff Goodell, author of "Big Coal," likens the dialogue between climate change believers and non-believers to discussions between differing religions.

"What do you say to people who don't believe in evolution?" Goodell said.

Wyoming State Climatologist Steve Gray warns that as droughts become more intense and heat waves increase in intensity, there will be more demand for water, and water conservation is something the state needs to address.

"There are many different lines of evidence pointing toward the climate changing, right now, and setting up for major changes," Gray said.

Gray said it helps no one when the climate change discussion is politicized. The most rational way to discuss climate change is within the realm of science -- things we can observe.

"I would suggest people look for themselves," Gray said. "Not only is there evidence in that the climate is changing and the earth as a whole is changing, but the way we use land, the way we build homes, the way we make a living -- all of these things are changing at once. People should ask themselves, 'What are my own observations?'"

Energy reporter Dustin Bleizeffer can be reached at (307) 577-6069 or dustin.bleizeffer@trib.com.


Previous   Next
Rushdie: Protect intellectual freedom   Suit seeks to revive loans for coal plants

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 2 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 9 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Marion wrote on Sep 28, 2008 6:25 AM:

" First of all, it simply is not true that a majority of SCIENTISTS beleive man made global warming is real. It is very hard for those that do not subscribe to the theory to get their message out. Liberal media is not interested. Even the most ardent believer is calling it "global climate change" now. why do you suppose that is? Just think of the freezing over the last few years. Those looking to sell an agenda or make money still believe, but not enough that they themselves feel the need to cut back. "

Swen Swenson wrote on Sep 28, 2008 8:26 AM:

" Question global warming? Gee, couldn't be because we remember all the alarmist nonsense about the coming ice age we heard back in the 1970s.

BTW, you need to get your memes straight. "Global warming" was last year. It now appears the globe has been cooling since about 1998, so the current preferred meme is "climate change". A much more useful concept as, no matter what the climate does, we can blame it on eViL humans. "

Inky wrote on Sep 28, 2008 11:15 AM:

" Readers take note: you should be aware of the political leanings and history of Keating and Peryam.
Keating is so deeply conservative (theologically and politically) that he once proposed shutting down Natrona County Public Health because it facilitated family planning and contraceptives.
Peryam got her start in politics by opposing an anti-smoking ordinance in Casper.
Big Energy has long adopted the tactics of denial and delay that were created by Big Tobacco. And you'll find that Big Energy and Big Tobacco have long funded conservative Republicans to a far greater extent than Democrats. "

Bubba wrote on Sep 28, 2008 3:48 PM:

" And there used to be a majority opinion that the Earth was flat.
Much later, there was a majority opinion that smoking was not harmful.
Today, a slim majority of Wyomingites do not agree that human-caused global warming is proven.
Science marches on and Wyoming brings up the rear. "

Dingus McGee wrote on Sep 28, 2008 10:59 PM:

" From story: Jim Huntington, 49, ..."But I don't see the other side being
presented," he said.

What can this mean? The "other side" is clearly quite visible. It is bull headed republicans saying that we're just entering a new natural cycle. They have NO DATA to support such a scientific claim. Jim, think of the other side as all talk and no walk. Yes, ice structures like the Wind River glaciers and the North Pole ice cap that have been around several hundred thousand years have seen volume reductions as high as 50% in the past 50 years. What's natural about this is that it's natural to see increased temperatures with increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. "

Clem wrote on Sep 29, 2008 1:29 PM:

" So what's up with the free political ad for worthless christy? I don't see any comments from the other candidates running for commissioner. "

know leanings wrote on Sep 29, 2008 2:03 PM:

" Already know your leanings inky and your bud bubba. Perhaps both of you support al gore by buying carbon credits. No if you were that concerned about the so far warming theories you would burn cow chips, ride in horse and buggys and have no computer as i suspect your response did not come via pony express. Besides that neither of you are degree holding climatologists so you opinion is nothing more than spouting what you want from your sides agenda. "

Common Sense wrote on Sep 29, 2008 10:08 PM:

" Why would we think that 6 billion people burning stuff and putting the gunk it produces into the atmosphere WOULDN'T cause a change? And why is there so much resistance to the finding, well accepted by 99% of the people who actually know about such things, that the change tends to be in the warm direction? The answer? Short term self interest. In Wyoming, that means "support coal." If the state had a normal, diverse economy, people might take positions using their brains, not their billfolds. "

Global Warming Debunker wrote on Sep 30, 2008 12:08 PM:

" Ok, those who believe in the cult of global warming, need to pick up their food ration cards right now, otherwise the earth will melt before our very eyes. I'm sure global warming cult believers won't mind experiencing food rationing to save the earth.

www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/sep/30/food.ethicalliving

Meat must be rationed to four portions a week, says report on climate change

People will have to be rationed to four modest portions of meat and one litre of milk a week if the world is to avoid run-away climate change, a major new report warns. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.