HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Bill could help trout fisheries

A fly-fisherman enjoys a morning on the water amid fall colors along the Gros Ventre River north of Jackson. A bill considered by a legislative committee would create a way for water right holders to leave water in streams to benefit trout without losing those rights. Photo by Mark Gocke, Star-Tribune correspondent.

Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


GREEN RIVER -- Ranchers and farmers have long known the real golden rule of the West: Water rights are gold, and you don't give them up.

You could, however, lend them for trout fishery purposes under a proposed bill discussed here Monday at a meeting of the Legislature's Joint Agriculture, State and Public Lands and Water Resources Interim Committee.

The draft "Landowner flexibility and fisheries protection and restoration" bill would legislate the right to acquire temporary water rights for trout fishery purposes under a new, pilot program to be overseen by the state engineer's office.

The proposed bill would allow landowners to either leave the direct flows of a natural waterway undiverted, or to introduce previously stored water into a creek or stream, to benefit trout populations.

Under the draft bill, the purchase, gift or lease of the temporary water right -- for a period of up to 10 years -- would only be granted if there will be no loss, abandonment or impairment of other water users' rights.

Additionally, the temporary water right couldn't result in more water leaving Wyoming than the amount of water that is allocated by interstate water compacts or court decree for downstream uses outside of the state.

The draft bill, offered by Rep. Rosie Berger, R-Sheridan, would create a strictly voluntary pilot program that would give landowners another tool to both help trout fisheries and conserve water.

Berger called the draft bill a "work in progress." The measure would sunset, or expire, in July 2019 unless extended by lawmakers.

"The basic intent is to encourage the conservation of water .... and at the same time maintain irrigated acreage while providing public benefits including (helping with) trout fisheries," Berger said.

"We have found that landowners do have excess water occasionally and don't want to lose it ... and this would give them an opportunity not to," she said.

Under the draft bill, a holder of a water right who conserves water may retain the right to the conserved water if it is voluntarily and temporarily transferred for a fishery purpose.

Lot of opportunities

Scott Yates with Trout Unlimited said the proposed program aims to restore flows in trout streams and creeks using privately held water rights.

The pilot projects could be of particular benefit to such species as the Colorado River and Bonneville cutthroat trout and could help in keeping the two species from being listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act.

He told the committee that allowing private landowners to temporarily dedicate water from streams "has never been utilized" to benefit trout fisheries in Wyoming before. "This is a different animal ... but there are a lot of opportunities," Yates said.

Under the draft bill, the state engineer's office and the Wyoming Game and Fish Department would conduct a study of each pilot project application before approval, and upon completion.

The studies would look at length of stream reach, expected fishery benefits during the term of the temporary right change, conditions needed to ensure the temporary change doesn't injure other appropriators, and methods of monitoring use of water under each lease.

Yates said conducting the study before granting a permit should help "avoid unintended consequences" to downstream water users and other appropriators.

He said there will be no abandonment or forfeiture of a landowner's water rights if a rancher or farmer participates in a pilot project.

"There's no change in the use ... it reverts back to its original use," Yates said. "We want to make sure other water-rights holders are not injured ... and we don't want to change the overall way water is being used."

Lawmakers showed little enthusiasm for the draft bill. Rep. Mark Semlek, R-Moorcroft, wondered if the landowners who granted the temporary water rights could be exposed to liability based on a possible federal listing of the Colorado River or Bonneville cutthroat trout.

"We've got to be careful where we're going with these unintended consequences," Semlek said.

Rep. Dan Zwonitzer, R-Cheyenne, said he would like to speak with a landowner or two who have specific projects in mind before he would consider backing the bill. "Find me some people ... maybe then you can get enough votes to pass," he said.

The joint committee meeting resumes at 8 a.m. today in the Green River City Council chambers.

Southwest Wyoming bureau reporter Jeff Gearino can be reached at 307-875-5359 or at gearino@tribcsp.com.


Previous   Next
Strand saved at the last minute   Wyo forests transfer money for fires

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 3 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

Brown Slayer wrote on Sep 30, 2008 9:08 AM:

" Way to go Scott Yates and Wyoming Trout Unlimited. Finally, steps are being taken to improve Wyoming's fishing and fisheries. Wyo G+F needs to jump on board and start following the lead on these types of projects. The G+F commissioners need to realize the true value of Wyoming's fisheries and start making decisions aimed at the future of Wyoming's waterways. So far, that thoughtful decision making has been absent. Out of state guiding services need to be regulated in this state, and the continuous raping of the north platte needs to be halted. Take action!! "

Common Sense wrote on Sep 30, 2008 10:50 PM:

" This is an excellent piece of legislation, going a long way to leaving behind the anachronistic old view that limits the use of a water right to irrigation. We need much more flexibility in this area. Rights holders shouldn't lose them just because they don't spread the water on a hay crop. "

Get a grip of reality wrote on Oct 2, 2008 10:05 PM:

" Common sense? Yes, but the landowners will kill it as they have many good bills to help wildlife or fisheries. Instream flow was only passed after the voters Iniative threatened to do it anyway. One of the many reasons the Voter's Iniative was made unreachable and they still want to make it harder to obtain. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.