CHEYENNE -- Walt Geis entered the voting booth in Shoshoni on Tuesday knowing that national Democrats would likely win the White House and add to their numbers in Congress -- but he was sure that Wyoming would vote solidly Republican.
"I was very confident that Wyoming still had enough courage to stick to their beliefs and not be wavered by the big flashy candidate," said Geis, a Republican who works as a state brand inspector in Fremont County.
He could scarcely have been more correct.
GOP candidates in Wyoming shellacked their Democratic opponents at just about every level, adding to Wyoming's reputation as one of the most Republican of states.
At the national level, Wyoming voters handed Sen. John McCain his largest margin of victory of any state except Oklahoma.
Sixty-five percent of Wyoming voters supported the Arizona senator, while less than 33 percent supported President-elect Barack Obama.
Wyoming's support for McCain even surpassed Republican strongholds Idaho and Utah. In Idaho, 62 percent of voters supported McCain; 36 percent were for Obama. In Utah, 63 percent supported McCain; 34 percent were for Obama.
Wyoming voters overwhelmingly voted for Republican candidates in all three congressional races.
U.S. Sens. Mike Enzi and John Barrasso defeated two Democratic candidates whose campaigns never really got off the ground.
Enzi beat University of Wyoming professor Chris Rothfuss with 76 percent of the vote to Rothfuss' 24 percent. Barrasso toppled Gillette attorney Nick Carter with 73 percent of the vote to Carter's 27 percent.
Even in the race for U.S. House, where Democrat Gary Trauner raised hundreds of thousands of dollars and campaigned for years, it wasn't enough to slice through Wyoming's bright Republican red.
Despite polls just days before the election showing Trauner in a dead heat with Republican Cynthia Lummis, Lummis prevailed by a 10-point margin.
UW political scientist Jim King said Trauner's real fault was his inability to distinguish himself sufficiently from Lummis on the issues. The voters fell back on their party affiliation in the voting booth as a result.
"For all that was spent in energy and money, Trauner was not able to truly differentiate himself from Lummis," King said. "In a GOP state, a Democrat can't have that."
Lummis said in a Wednesday morning meeting with reporters that her campaign benefited from an appearance by Vice President Dick Cheney and a series of public debates on the issues in the final days of the election.
"I too was very, very surprised by the margin of victory because I felt throughout the race that it was extremely close," Lummis said.
Republicans also dominated in statehouse races, where unofficial results from The Associated Press show Republicans defeated Democrats in all five contested races in the state Senate.
Republicans ran unopposed in nine races while Democrats ran unopposed in two.
Before the election, Republicans outnumbered Democrats in the state Senate by a margin of 23-7. In the House, they outnumbered Democrats 43-17.
Democrats had hoped to win 21 seats in the Legislature, giving them enough votes to protect a gubernatorial veto.
Depending on the outcome of a recount in one Teton County race, the Democrats could pick up one seat, bringing their total to a mere 19 seats.
UW's King said there was every reason to expect Republicans to make a strong showing Tuesday. Wyoming is far too red to be swayed easily by what's happening on the national political stage, he said.
"There wasn't the type of broad (national) movement that would have shifted Wyoming," King said.
Amy Larimer, executive director of the Wyoming Republican Party, said voters in Wyoming were energized by the candidates on the Republican ticket.
They were proud to vote for McCain and thrilled to re-elect Enzi and elect Barrasso, both of whom have been "phenomenal" and "really great Republicans," Larimer said.
They also showed their faith in Lummis as a tested leader, she said.
Larimer said state Republicans vote for GOP candidates because they cherish the party's values.
"People in Wyoming have Republican values," she said. "They believe in lower taxes, less government and a stronger national defense."
Bill Luckett, executive director of the Wyoming Democratic Party, agreed that the excitement of the presidential race and two incumbent senators on the ballot helped down-ticket Republicans.
Otherwise, he said, Trauner would have had a good shot of defeating Lummis.
"If the U.S. House race was isolated on the ballot without those Senate races, you would have seen a different result," Luckett said.
"We started out with an incredible disadvantage and didn't quite get past it this time," he added.
Lewis Newman of Casper, a Republican and lifelong Wyoming resident, said he wasn't a bit surprised to see the GOP dominate Tuesday -- but he's not sure it's such a good thing.
It's not healthy for the Republicans to have so much power, Newman said.
"If they took Saddam Hussein and put an 'R' behind his name, he would get elected in this state," Newman said. "Voters don't give two thoughts to who they send back to Washington."
Gov. Dave Freudenthal, the state's only Democratic statewide office holder, said one reason for the lack of political competition in Wyoming is the low expectation of congressional delegates.
Freudenthal, who endorsed Obama and Trauner, said voters and the state news media accept the argument from GOP delegates that more can't be done for Wyoming because Washington, D.C., is fundamentally hostile toward the state.
"What we've done is accepted this argument that we are just Wyoming and we can't get much done," Freudenthal said. "I don't think we expect enough."
Freudenthal also placed responsibility on state Democratic candidates, who he said tend to talk about issues that interest them instead of issues important to Wyoming voters.
"The Democrats who are successful talk about what matters in their districts," said Freudenthal, adding that Wyoming today is similar in some ways to the Deep South when Democrats dominated all of politics there.
"So we really don't have a two-party system," he said.
Contact capital bureau reporter Jared Miller at (307) 632-1244 or jared.miller@trib.com
Seeing red
Arizona Sen. John McCain easily won Wyoming's three electoral votes. In fact, only Oklahoma was more supportive of McCain in voting Tuesday. Here's a look at how some of the nation's most Republican states voted in the presidential race:
Oklahoma
McCain: 65.6 percent
Obama: 34.4 percent
Wyoming
McCain: 65.2 percent
Obama: 32.7 percent
Utah
McCain: 62.9 percent
Obama: 34.2 percent
Idaho
McCain: 61.5 percent
Obama: 36.1 percent
Alabama
McCain: 60.4 percent
Obama: 38.8 percent
Reader Comments
Comments to this story.
Curious wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:11 AM:
Curious wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:44 AM:
Ryan wrote on Nov 6, 2008 11:02 AM:
We vote on principals and logic here.
We do not vote on emotion and unspecified, nebulous hope.
The major urban centers are filled with irrational, ill educated, emotive people.
We in the rural parts of the nation make a living based on our wits and hard work. Not chasing frivolous endeavors. "
Realist wrote on Nov 6, 2008 11:07 AM:
free2bme wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:12 PM:
Robin wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:24 PM:
Robin wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:32 PM:
The Truth wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:33 PM:
ohhhhhhBS wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:02 PM:
Howard wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:39 PM:
Say it again wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:44 PM:
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 6, 2008 2:14 PM:
Facts wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:17 PM:
Just Wondering wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:39 PM:
Also, if you don't like WY or the political beliefs of the majority of the population, why don't you just do all of us a favor and leave instead of whining?
The comments of posters such as Casper Resident is in some regards humorous, but the unwillingness to objectively analyze the reasons behind the way most WY people vote is scary.
I for one am going to give the next 4 years a chance and "hope" that something good is accomplished, but I have doubts, because both political parties are failing us. "
Shepard wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:20 PM:
Is that the America you want?
That is Obama's America. "
aunt b wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:45 PM:
I personally can respect anyone's right to their own opinions, but I should not be shunned for my own. I was born and raised in this beautiful state that I call home and I am NOT going anywhere. And Casper Resident, god bless you for your knowledgeable comments on here and I am with you...it breaks my heart to think that my son and other children in this country will be dealing with the deficit that the current republican regime has left us with! And you are right, policies that just increase the amount of tax breaks wealthy families and huge corporations get (the rich keep getting richer) will not affect the people who blindly vote for a republican party member....unless you are making upwards of six figures or more! I am a hard working middle class mother who actually cares about her fellow americans and would like to see them get a hand up, but not a hand out. I actually heard a republican yesterday say, "I am just going to quit my job and go on Welfare so that I don't have to pay taxes to support other people" wow....whatever happened to caring about other people and not tying conditions to it? "
KMAINWY wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:11 PM:
Lonnie wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:30 PM:
Yep I am angry wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:58 PM:
WhyOming wrote on Nov 6, 2008 6:51 PM:
Darce Kruuze wrote on Nov 7, 2008 6:19 AM:
not really wrote on Nov 7, 2008 7:44 AM:
Just wait untill your untested leader with no experience other than helping ruin Illinois and pressing the present button instead of voting yes or no raises corporate taves. We already hold the record for the worlds highest corporate tax. That will cause more job losses and less to distribute to those such as you.
Wait till the taxes are also raised on workers i suggest you look at norway and its problems related to this as their workers exit to other places with lower taxes.
As far as punishing corporations who have moved that will not happen. It is because of the protections of the various free trage agreements. Any atempt to do the punishing will be a G8 issue and he will not be able to do it. Protectionalism has never worked.
Welcome all the the United Socialist Association/USA "
Hampton wrote on Nov 7, 2008 8:36 AM:
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 7, 2008 8:53 AM:
old timer wrote on Nov 7, 2008 2:28 PM:
Mike wrote on Nov 7, 2008 6:24 PM:
whats wrong with being on welfare, its kind of like being a stock broker or banker. "
Obamas health care plan wrote on Nov 7, 2008 10:55 PM:
10. Your Viagra prescription includes a Popsicle stick and some duct tape.
9. The only 100% covered expense is embalming.
8. Your Prozac comes in colors and has little "m"s on each pill.
7. Preventive Care Coverage includes "an apple a day".
6. Your primary care physician is wearing the pants you gave to Goodwill last month.
5. The Lone Star Bar and Grill is an approved pharmacy.
4. The only proctologist lists his address as Rotorooter.
3. The tongue depressors taste faintly of Fudge sickles.
2. Directions to the Dr.'s office include "Take a left when you enter the trailer park".
1. The annual breast exam is conducted at Hooter's
The cost of this exceptional plan is 400.00 per month "
Big Horn Basin wrote on Nov 8, 2008 5:58 AM:
Disgusted Wyomingite wrote on Nov 8, 2008 7:16 AM:
stock broker and that person was just
as mad at the people who butchered
the banking system. Also, when I
took a Social Welfare Policy class under
Dr.Chesteen. We were told that
"welfare" is suppose to be "temporary"
and not a way of life. "
O.P.P. wrote on Nov 8, 2008 9:26 AM:
Yep wrote on Nov 8, 2008 10:26 AM:
georgewashakie wrote on Nov 8, 2008 11:28 AM:
Michael Rissler wrote on Nov 8, 2008 11:50 AM:
To Casper Resident wrote on Nov 8, 2008 2:28 PM:
You by your very own words must be a Republican. "
Ricardo wrote on Nov 8, 2008 4:36 PM:
Susan Jones wrote on Nov 8, 2008 6:41 PM:
lol wrote on Nov 9, 2008 5:28 AM:
Proudwyomingite wrote on Nov 9, 2008 5:36 AM:
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 10, 2008 7:40 AM:
My theory wrote on Nov 10, 2008 10:03 AM:
well casper residend wrote on Nov 10, 2008 11:18 AM:
Loose the sheep comments it sounds like a date proposal from the wrong state CA is it. "
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 10, 2008 11:24 AM:
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 10, 2008 11:34 AM:
My theory wrote on Nov 10, 2008 12:04 PM:
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 10, 2008 1:48 PM:
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 10, 2008 1:50 PM:
Not a Transplanted Casper Resident wrote on Nov 10, 2008 3:02 PM:
REZ wrote on Nov 10, 2008 3:57 PM:
Wyoming should be ashamed of thier blind unabashed faith and alliegence to the republican party, if Ted Stevens was from Wyoming he would have been re-elected just like in Alaska.
I am proud that the Reservation polls mirrored exactly the opposite of Wyoming. OBAMA, OBAMA, OBAMA!!! "
Lovewyoming wrote on Nov 11, 2008 4:35 AM:
Not a Transplanted Casper Resident wrote on Nov 11, 2008 11:00 AM:
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 11, 2008 2:29 PM:
Lovewyoming wrote on Nov 11, 2008 7:25 PM:
I think wrote on Nov 11, 2008 9:40 PM:
REZ wrote on Nov 12, 2008 7:57 AM:
Its sounds good to preach "pull your self up by your boot straps", probably feels even better when telling that to a NdN. Too bad that many Tribal members don't have the blueprint I used for a sense of direction. The dynamic of reservation system is morbid, but then it wasn't created for the well being of American tribes. Ranching and my work in Education shows not only my demographic, but esspecially the young and retired, that living here doesn't have to be hard, bleek or glum. I did my granddad right by cowboying and my dad by getting educated and educating. I do for my people by living, working and contributing.
My political alliegence will always be to my tribe. Common sense tells me that the pilgrim will again have to ask the Tribes for help saving this democracy instead of creating it. Change is here, well maybe not Wyoming, but as America goes so goes.... "
Simpson wrote on Nov 12, 2008 11:27 AM:
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 12, 2008 11:53 AM:
Wyosavvy wrote on Nov 12, 2008 1:25 PM:
Troll Alert wrote on Nov 12, 2008 2:37 PM:
Wyoming Resident wrote on Nov 12, 2008 2:50 PM:
Demonizing your opposition does not make them look small but it does make you look small.
Try to beat people with the content of your argument and not by attack and denigration.
If you cannot win with logic based on facts, you cannot win at all and your position is unsupportable.
Teach this to your children too. We have enough non-thinkers already in this state and nation. "
6th grade Teacher wrote on Nov 12, 2008 3:56 PM:
This argument is about more than hope for change (neither of which is a plan, or a method).
This argument is whether substance matters in America any more, or if earnest talk and symbolism are more important to us as a nation.
Are we thinkers or are we non-thinkers. That is what is at the heart of the argument.
Now only time will tell, based on President Elect Obama's future performance once he is in office and actually serving the electorate. "
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:10 AM:
Simply because someone does not agree with your point of view does not make them demonds, communists, marxists, ignorant or their ideas and values less valid than your ideas and values, nor does it mean that they are working with terrorists.
Demonizing your opposition does not make them look small but it does make you look small.
Try to beat people with the content of your argument and not by attack and denigration.
If you cannot win with logic based on facts, you cannot win at all and your position is unsupportable.
Teach this to your children too. We have enough non-thinkers already in this state and nation.
Think for yourselves Wyoming; the republican party has been playing you for decades, doing nothing for you, and convincing you that they are on your side, when in reality they are on the side of big business, big energy, and powerful lobbiests. "
More of the same wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:34 AM:
This is not a an effective way to argue your position and your unsubstantiated attacks probably harden your opponents stances. Coming from a an independent position, I know that Casper Resident's illogical rhetoric turns me off and makes me not want to be affiliated with this person in anyway. I wonder if Casper Resident has the cognitive ability to objectively view how this approach is in actuality most likely hurting instead helping their cause. "
georgewashakie wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:38 AM:
headed for the retirement home, the nursing home, and the funeral home. "
Gregory wrote on Nov 13, 2008 1:20 PM:
In a subjective world this might be the case. However we live in an objective world where truths do not go out of fashion or where situational ethics are acceptable (they are not).
Save the name calling until after Mr. Obama has actually accomplished something positive for America. For now his potential leadership and achievements are all just speculation based on hope for some undescribed changes. "
motoboy wrote on Nov 13, 2008 1:20 PM:
Canton Bell wrote on Nov 13, 2008 3:18 PM:
Do you want to be able to freely employ your natural talents, acquired skills and hardwork to secure you own future and potentially build personal wealthy?
Do you want the government to get out of your way and get out of your wallet?
Do you want America to remain a secure, free nation able to act of it's own volition when appropriate?
If so, the Republican Party is the party for you.
The Democrat Party would allow you none of that based on their agenda of social control under an intrusive, massive government that make all outcomes equal regardless of how long and how hard you work to earn your own way ahead.
These times will change, and self determination and self reliance, cornerstones of what made and has kept America free and strong, will come back into popularity. Then, most of the public will have realized the error of their hasty thinking in 2008 as they tried to "punish" Geogre W. Bush for all the things that the far liberal left as aided and abetted by the media has accussed him of. "
Not Changing wrote on Nov 14, 2008 6:16 AM:
OHSkepticalMe wrote on Nov 14, 2008 9:26 AM:
You Betcha wrote on Nov 14, 2008 10:54 AM:
If you want change and you want Wyoming to become Southern California, then moving is the best suggestion that I can offer to you. "
Good Ol Red Wyo wrote on Nov 14, 2008 11:12 AM:
We like our guns, we want to keep them.
We love our Babies, we want them to live.
We like our hard earned money, we want to keep it.
We like our livestock and wild game, we don't like the wolves killing them.
We love our country, we want it defended.
We Abhor terrorists, we don't associate with or tolerate them.
We respect the constitution, we want courts to uphold it, not rewrite it.
We value family and marriage, we don't want them trrown out the window and replaced with perversions.
We understand free enterprise and believe it's better than "government controlled economy".
We don't believe our trucks have destroyed the environment and caused man-made global warming.
We value our citizenship and don't want illegal criminals given a free pass.
We believe that the USA is the greatest country in the world and we are proud of it: therefore, we attempted on 11/4 to keep America great! "
Casper Resident wrote on Nov 14, 2008 11:15 AM:
get real wrote on Nov 14, 2008 12:03 PM:
You live in a dream world don't you? I guess Rush Limbaugh must be your primary source for news and information because you are completely misinformed about what's going on in the real world. Bush has been a complete disaster. I am sure we could randomly pick a president on the street anywhere in America and end up with a more competent president. If you think Bush has done a good job then you are too stupid and shouldn't be allowed to vote. Talk to me in a few years about all that dillusional stuff that you think Obama is going to do; you will find out that he is not going to do any of that; it's all a smoke and mirror show by the republican party designed to try to scare you away from making the right decision and voting for Obama. You will see. Meanwhile keep your paranoid dillusions to yourself, as they are not true. If any of that actually happens then I will be the first one to step up and admit it, but I don't believe it for a minute. Obama seems to me like he is trying to bring people together while you and your croud are trying to continue to divide the nation like you have done for the last eight years. "
Blowing in the Wind wrote on Nov 14, 2008 12:41 PM:
By the way, right to work is far better than self-serving unions, ask GM, Ford and Chrysler! "
Bad Ideas wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:32 PM:
After all, our kids, grand kids and great grand kids don't need a future, not ahead of our comfortable life today. "
Duh wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:36 PM:
Unions are like Jesse Jackson; they serve no useful purpose, they waste endless dollars and they create and perpetuate endless controvery.
Why do you think that the Winchester Plant in New England folded and restarted production in SC?
Why do you think that Ford, GM and Dodge are on the brink of folding and the foreign auto makers in the south are all booming?
The answer is unions. They are a hold over from bad old days now long gone. yet they keep robbing workers of money and bankrupting businesses that are the back bone of the US economy. "
What a Joke wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:37 PM:
Re: the slam on "right to work". Are you aware of the troubles in the auto industry? Unions raised the costs for the big three, so that they could not compete with foreign producers. And now they want us to bail out the auto makers, so that over paid union employees can continue to feed on the gravy train while drinking their coffee - at my expense - disgusting it is. Let them fail I say.
Re: current financial meltdown. While both parties share the blame, the Dems are more at fault. It was their party that decided owning a house was an entitlement and hence forcing lenders to issue sub-prime loans to ensure the unqualified borrowers got their new entitlement. And then the Dems in congress would not acknowledge or address the subprime problems once the Republicans finally tried to do something about it. Gee thanks Barney Frank and Harry Reid.
I find it ridiculous that people cannot use their brain and recognize these issues for what they are. Why do the Dems blame everything on the Republicans without holding their own party accountable too? Stupid Fools that want the government to take care of them at my expense. Sorry I'm not going to support such a proposition so I have no other choice than to support the Republicans. But since you obviously are one of the weak that need the government to take care of you, I don't expect you to understand. "
Not Changing wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:53 PM:
Reham wrote on Nov 14, 2008 2:43 PM:
I see clearly wrote on Nov 14, 2008 4:47 PM:
good grief wrote on Nov 15, 2008 8:24 AM:
1. There has been a total lack of bipartisanism in the national legislative branch since Newt and company took a slim majority. Now the other side has a large majority they say it is time for bipartisanism. Exactly why should they get what they were unwilling to give?
2. The conservative accepts mavericks and had one running as president. The other side is trying to strip and or otherwise punish a maverick from their party who was on a previous ticket as vice president. Now why is that?
3. Our country has the highest corporate tax in the world so why is it a wonder that they leave to other countries taking our jobs away from us?
4. Both parties are at fault for not stopping illegal entry and allowing the illegal’s to obtain employment at lowered wages taking more jobs away from citizens. This is not service industry or farm work it includes construction etc. why is that?
5. The left wants the fairness doctrine brought back to the media yet no one is suggesting that same doctrine be applied to the education system. Why is that?
6. Why is it that a non endangered Canadian gray can be relocated at great expense to our country and added to the endangered species list?
Well that is enough for now as I do not want to ask the really hard questions and confound the left.
On a side note it is the left that murders its unborn thus they will eventually be an endangered sect thus allowing reason to re emerge in the political arena. "
we the sheep wrote on Nov 15, 2008 8:45 AM:
georgewashakie wrote on Nov 15, 2008 9:00 AM:
--paraphrased from Sarah Palin "
Shooter wrote on Nov 15, 2008 12:57 PM:
WOW wrote on Nov 15, 2008 2:34 PM:
1. I always vote.
2. If my guy (or gal) gets in and stinks, I say, "Well! I wouldn't have voted for him, if I'd have known he was going to do that."
3. I the other guy gets in and stinks, I say, "Well! I knew that was going to happen; that's why I voted for the other guy."
4. Next election, I vote.
At my coffee shop, I hear a lot of disgruntled remarks about Barack Obama. Sadly, too many of them are focused on the fact that we have elected that ***racial slur deleted*** or that ***(erroneous) religious slur deleted***
If you are mad that the Democrat got elected, I can understand your frustration. I only hope that you will try to be optimistic and a part of the solution to our problems. If you are mad because that particular Democrat got elected, due to your own ignorance or racism, I can only feel sorry for you. "
Speed Bump wrote on Nov 15, 2008 5:06 PM:
Speed Bump wrote on Nov 15, 2008 5:25 PM:
I believe you mean a 3 billion dollar deficit (compliments of George W. Bush and the Republican party).. A Freudian slip, perhaps? "
Proud Wyomingite wrote on Nov 15, 2008 8:40 PM:
Submit a Comment