HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Effort would make St. Louis clean coal focal point


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


ST. LOUIS -- Two major coal companies and one of the Midwest's largest utilities are combining with Washington University to try and make St. Louis the nation's center for clean coal research and education.

Arch Coal and Peabody Energy are based in St. Louis and both have coal mining operations in Wyoming. The utility company Ameren Corp. also is based in St. Louis. Chief executive officers from those companies and Washington University Chancellor Mark Wrighton on Tuesday announced formation of the Consortium for Clean Coal Utilization.

"Despite these difficult financial times, the university and these lead corporate sponsors realize that the investment in such research will benefit the region and the world in the long run," Wrighton said at a news conference at the university. "The knowledge and technology we will be able to create together will over time mean lower costs to customers and global environmental improvement."

Wrighton said the university has dedicated more than $60 million over the past year in education and research on energy, the environment and sustainability. A new building is expected to open in 2010.

Under the consortium, Arch Coal and Peabody each will contribute $5 million and Ameren will contribute $2 million. The money will be paid over a five-year period.

Coal is a vital part of power production in the U.S. and around the world. About half of all power generated in the U.S. comes from coal. Ameren chief executive Gary Rainwater said 85 percent of Ameren's electricity is generated by coal. The company serves parts of Missouri and Illinois.

The consortium will explore the possibility of combusting coal with biomass, or combustion of coal in pure oxygen, among other options. The goal is to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas most closely linked with global warming.

"I'm often asked does clean coal technology work," said Steven Leer, chief executive of Arch Coal. "The answer is a resounding yes." He noted that the use of coal has tripled since 1970, but pollutant emissions are now about 30 percent of what they were then.

President-elect Barack Obama has shown some signs of supporting clean coal technology. As a senator from Illinois, he supported the state's bid for the FutureGen experimental coal-fired power plant that was awarded to Mattoon, Ill. But in January, the U.S. Department of Energy pulled the plug on that project. Local supporters hope to revive it once Obama takes office.

Some environmentalists say there's no such thing as clean coal, especially stopping the emission of carbon dioxide. Calls to representatives of the Sierra Club were not immediately returned.

St. Louis' coal leaders say carbon dioxide can be reduced. The issue, they said, is getting technology to the point where it can be done in a cost-efficient way.

"The toughest issues are probably going to be the social issues, the environmental issues, around how we dispose of carbon dioxide once we capture it," Rainwater said.

Richard Axelbaum, director of the consortium, noted that oil, gas, wind and solar energy are only realistically plentiful in certain parts of the world. "Coal represents perhaps the only source of energy available in every nation," he said.


Previous   Next
States blast feds' sheep rule   Sheridan seeks retirees who want to work

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 3 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

truth wrote on Dec 3, 2008 9:16 AM:

" Question: If we jump thru all these expensive hoops , what will be the measurable effect on the temperature of the earth?
Answer: none. There will be no effect. Ask any of the paid government "researchers". The output of the U.S. is small compared to the rest of the world. And there is still no proof that man made activities have changed the climate any more than it changes on its own.

But nevertheless, with nonsense like this we will all be paying huge increases for energy, further crippling our economy. "

Represenitive-Elect WY HD44 wrote on Dec 3, 2008 5:29 PM:

" This may be correct now. In a coupled of years the focus and $ will be at UW. "

Ed wrote on Dec 4, 2008 8:19 AM:

" Smart way to position themselves for some federal dollars. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.