HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Possible wolf sighting near Muddy Mountain


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


It's not unusual to see a few deer along Highway 485, but one man said he recently saw a pair of black wolves while driving the road to Laramie.

Van Myers said he saw the wolves near the Muddy Mountain area, about 30 miles south of Casper, during a work trip.

"I drove off the road there, and I watched them for probably 4 or 5 minutes through my binoculars," Myers said. "I just assumed they were probably deer or antelope."

Myers works for an oil company with fields in Laramie and makes the drive on Highway 485 frequently.

"I was very surprised to see them in that area," he said. "I travel that road through Shirley Basin quite often. We see antelope, deer, coyotes and elk, but this was kind of unusual."

Myers said he reported the sighting to the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, but never heard back from anyone.

A spokesman for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department said the agency recently has received calls from several people saying they've seen wolves in the Muddy Mountain area.

"We have not confirmed any wolves in that area," Eric Keszler said. Keszler also noted there have been no reports of livestock attacks.

Myers is certain it was a pair of black wolves that crossed the road in front of him, whether or not Game and Fish can confirm his sighting.

"Like usual when you see Elvis, Sasquatch or UFOs, I didn't have a camera," he said. "We see antelope, deer, coyotes and elk, but this was kind of unusual."

Reach education reporter Jasa Santos at (307) 266-0593 or at Jasa.Santos@trib.com.


Previous   Next
Casper briefs   Meth conference begins today

Article Rating

Current Rating: 4 of 4 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 9 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

JC wrote on Jan 6, 2009 4:49 AM:

" Reporter: There is no Highway 485 in that area. Get your facts straight, don't compromise an otherwise good article. "

Dismayed wrote on Jan 6, 2009 5:38 AM:

" Defenders of Wildlife has announced plans to (reintroduce) wolves thru the southern Rockies, so they really do not want any confirmed sightings to upset their rape of taxpayers and ranchers. "

Mandy SSS wrote on Jan 6, 2009 7:46 AM:

" I'm tellin ya, everyone should start carrying cameras with them...it's just too bad they aren't attachable to rifle scopes... "

spazzoid wrote on Jan 6, 2009 11:14 AM:

" Okay so we live by a mountain and people are suprised to see wildlife like wolves and bears. So what if you see them lets just let them be. They are wild and that is what they are meant to be is wild. SO LET THEM BE WILD AND LIVE IN THE MOUNTAINS WHERE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO LIVE!!!!! "

KMAINWY wrote on Jan 7, 2009 10:20 AM:

" Spazzoid, we will let the wolves be wild and live when the wolves allow our pets and livestock live without fear. "

G. wrote on Jan 8, 2009 8:59 AM:

" kmainwy,

havnt you thought that the livestock of us, humans, is food for wolves? also, if you look at the humans... we aslo kill billions of animals for food... so they will leave our livestock not alone, its just natural... so let them be there, ANd if you want to defend/protect your livestock, maybe its better to use quard dogs or use electrical wires to hold of the wolves... o and itsa also usefull to keep your livestock and cattle close to ya "

oh-no wrote on Jan 8, 2009 12:53 PM:

" Oh here we go... everyone will talk up killing wolves again since we just have sooo much cattle and so many pets around Muddy Mountain that need protected. "

tired wrote on Jan 8, 2009 2:30 PM:

" So correct me if I am wrong, but were the wolves not there before humans then cattle arrived in this area??? I am tired of hearing oh my poor poor cattle were killed and eaten by some such "monster" isn't that the risk you take when you do not have a feedlot type cattle business? If you are so worried about your precious one or two cattle that might be seen as food by a "predator" then maybe you should open up a feed lot and keep your poor cows in a small filthy smelly pen and that way you can guard them better. As "G" wrote also keep them close to you if you want to protect them.... not on the open RANGE where anything can happen. "

landerite wrote on Jan 9, 2009 3:37 PM:

" From David L. Mech, the most prominent Wolf biologist in the United States:

MECH
• It has not been demonstrated that “a substantial reduction” in wolf abundance will
occur, and my opinion is that it will not because merely to hold a wolf population
stationary requires an annual take of 28-50% per year.(P7)
• Starting with a base population of 1,545 wolves in late 2007 (Final Rule)
and adding the average 24% annual increase shown from 1995 through 2006
yields 1,916 wolves expected to be present in fall 2008. (P7)
• (Here I should note that the estimate of 1,545 wolves is a minimum estimate, i.e.
there were supposedly a minimum of 1,545 wolves. As wolf populations increase,
it becomes increasingly harder to count them accurately and the minimal counts
become increasingly lower than actual. Thus a better estimate of the actual
population could be about 1,700, and thus the 2008 estimate would be 2,108.)P8
• Assuming the minimum figure and that ID actually takes 328 wolves which is its
limit but which seems very unrealistic (Mech 2001) that would still be only 17%
of the minimal population.(P8)
• Wolves from YNP have traveled to central Colorado and Utah, and wolves from
ID have traveled to Oregon and Washington.(P9)
• In any case, the number of wolves projected to be killed under state management
should not jeopardize the viability of the NRM wolf population. Every year, most
wolf populations almost double in the spring through the birth of pups (average =
6/litter [Mech 1970]; most packs produce a single litter, but several YNP packs
produce 2 or 3 litters per pack). For example in May 2008, there will not be 1,500
but 3000!
• Wolf population estimates are usually made in winter when the population is at
the annual nadir. This approach serves to provide conservative estimates and
further ensure that management remains conservative. As indicated above, 28-
50% of a wolf population must be killed by humans per year (on top of natural
mortality) to even hold a wolf population stationary. (P13)

It's time to delist them before their numbers explode to levels that cannot be managed.

Unless you want to see aerial gunning that is. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.