HomeNewsSportsMoreWeatherAnnouncementsClassifiedsMy Trib.ComMy CityJobsHomesCars
Advanced Search
 

Group sues on 'extreme-density drilling'


Story Tools

Print this story

E-mail this story

Rate this story

Text Size

Share This Story:
del.icio.usdiggNewsVine




trib.popular


LANDER -- A prominent environmental group is trying to stop the construction of new roads and new drilling pads on the Jonah natural gas field in western Wyoming.

The Laramie-based Biodiversity Conservation Alliance filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of Wyoming on Tuesday in an attempt to protect native wildlife -- such as the declining sage grouse population -- in and around the 40-square-mile Jonah gas play south of Pinedale.

"What we want to say to the BLM with this lawsuit is 'never again,"' said Erik Molvar, a wildlife biologist with the conservation group. "Never again should this agency approve such a destructive oil and gas development that so completely flies in the face of multiple use."

The federal Bureau of Land Management was wrong in 2006 when it approved "extreme-density drilling" in the Jonah field, the group is arguing.

In a media release on Tuesday, Molvar claimed the intensity of the approved drilling would "create a wasteland of over 30,000 acres of land in the Upper Green River Valley."

There is "no excuse," Molvar said, for the BLM's decision to allow the so-called extreme-density drilling -- when directional drilling is a reasonable alternative.

Directional drilling is a technique where operators drill multiple wells in multiple directions from a single pad. The practice causes less overall damage to soil and plants as compared to the harm inflicted by the traditional one-well-per-pad approach.

"The well pads will virtually touch each other across 30,000 acres, wiping out key habitats for sensitive sagebrush songbirds, the rare pygmy rabbit and the critically imperiled sage grouse," Molvar said.

On the nearby Pinedale Anticline gas field, most wells are drilled directionally, with up to 32 wells on each pad, Molvar argued.

"We're asking the court to halt the construction of additional roads and well pads, but to permit drilling of new wells on well pads that have already been built, using directional drilling," Molvar said. "If EnCana would have kept drilling directionally from the locations they already had, they could have produced the entire gas deposit with very little additional impact on wildlife and the public lands."

EnCana is the largest producer of natural gas in the Jonah field.

But an industry representative argued that the BCA's claims are misleading. And the current approach to developing the field will actually be better for the environment in the long term, he argued.

Randy Teeuwen, spokesman for EnCana Oil and Gas Inc., said the working area of the Jonah field is about 24,000 acres -- not 30,000 as the BCA claims -- and operators cannot disturb more than 14,030 acres at any given time.

Once the drilling is complete, the area and habitat that was disturbed is reclaimed by law, he said. Plants and grasses are regrown and the natural habitat is reconstituted, he added, all the way up to the well head.

As for directional drilling, EnCana does have the technical expertise to do it, Teeuwen said, but the company has good reasons for vertically drilling the field instead.

"One reason, which is significant, is it takes us less time to drill the vertical wells," he said. "And because of that, it saves the emissions from the operations that are associated with drilling."

The reduced drilling time, in combination with the use of natural gas-powered rigs, lessens overall nitrogen oxide emissions by about 85 percent, Teeuwen said.

"The whole vertical drilling issue is something that (the) Biodiversity (Conservation Alliance) has chosen to disregard in terms of the benefits it has environmentally," he said.

"It is a highly dense drilling operation, but we feel it is our responsibility to extract as much of that gas as possible while we're there, for the benefit of the American public, and reclaim that land."

In a matter of years, Teeuwen said, the land will "be back to pretty much its original condition," and the field will also continue to produce natural gas for perhaps another 40 years.

"I think it's really important to consider what is at stake long term," he said. "We're going to be providing gas to heat homes across the nation for a long time, but in the span in a relatively short period of time that land will go back to where it started."

Additionally, the company has agreed to pay $24.5 million for what is called off-site mitigation, where for every acre disturbed on the Jonah field, there is a two-acre habitat improvement or conservation project completed somewhere nearby, Teeuwen said.

Merry Gamper, a natural resource specialist with the BLM's Pinedale Field Office, said she hadn't yet heard the details of the lawsuit on Tuesday.

The BLM decided to allow denser well pad spacing in 2006, she said, as part of a larger, "aggressive, accelerated reclamation project."

The operators are drilling faster to get to the reclamation phase sooner, she said, and well pads are generally gone and habitat reclamation begun within two months of drilling.

Rev. Warren Murphy, director of the Wyoming Association of Churches, said his group is not part of the lawsuit, but it supports the BCA's attempts to halt new construction on the Jonah field.

"The Wyoming Association of Churches is dedicated to protecting the unique social and natural heritage of the state of Wyoming. We refer to this calling as 'stewardship,"' Murphy said. "The Bureau of Land Management, which is called to be a steward of these lands as well, has often replaced stewardship with the desire to drill more and more. It is time to slow down the process so that we can ask ourselves the question of how much we want to sacrifice."


Previous   Next
Former judge leaves legacy of fairness, patriotism   Wyoming to consider marriage amendment

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

There are 13 comment(s)

Comments to this story.

BULL wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:17 AM:

" The only density problem is all the subdivisions full of over sized mansions with Hummers parked in front of them. These idiotic transplants wont quit until they have Wyoming just like Kornyfornia and that other wierdo coast. "

Enuff wrote on Jan 14, 2009 11:26 AM:

" " Wyoming association of churches " , what a crock. I suppose they don't use any gas or oil either. "

LaramieResident wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:03 PM:

" What does this have to do with Wyomingites "using any gas?" The gas from these wells is piped straight to California and other urban centers. You do realize there are only 500,000 people in Wyoming right, a few wells would supply the entire state with plenty of gas. This has to do with the greedy energy companies. Wyoming doesn't have the pipeline capacity to carry any more gas. The Biodiversity Conservation Alliance isn't trying to shut down drilling anyway. They want a responsible plan that utilizes existing well pads instead of building new ones. The energy companies don't want to do it, because it cuts into their profits. Without groups like the BCA, Wyoming would be one big gas rig. I get sick of Wyomingites not standing up and trying to protect what we cherish so much in this state. Hopefully the BCA can win this one, there is no reason Pinedale should have to be living with the lousy air quality due to the lousy land management practices of the BLM. "

69Ford wrote on Jan 14, 2009 3:52 PM:

" There is no reason Pinedale had to be over run with Caliphony transplants either , Laramie resident. Wherever those sicko crybabies move into , they squeel about oil & gas production. Park County is another haven for them. Without oil & gas revenues , Wyoming would have an income tax and higher sales and property taxes. "

Proud Wyomingite wrote on Jan 14, 2009 5:10 PM:

" All in all, Encana and Questar have gone above and beyond BLM stipulations, and their reclamation practice is industry leading. Industry leading in an industry that does not focus on reclamation. There is definatly room for improvement.

Just remember this - Wildlife, habitat, and clean air are Wyoming resources as well. "

john wrote on Jan 14, 2009 5:12 PM:

" about time somebody reminds BLM of its multi use mandates "

BoulderWy wrote on Jan 14, 2009 5:31 PM:

" Well now, nothing like a bunch of 3rd grade drop outs commenting on things over their heads. The density, habitat distruction, dust, benzene, SO2,NO2 is enough to make anyone sick. The brown cloud that forms over my property has nothing to do with Hummers, people from Ca or small minded people on this blog. It stems from poor management policy, not using the tools as in theClean Air/ Clean water Act. Our elected officals don't care about the health risk to humans or the extreme loss of all forms of wildlife. For my part, I ski into the Winds and collect snow samples for the USFS above Big Sandy and north of Elkhart Park. When the new administration comes in maybe someone will held accountable.I suggest that bull,enuff and 69ford spend some time in downtown LA, Houston or maybe Atlanta during a normal brown day. The air quality will be better than Pinedale or Daniel. Maybe 69 should sample some good benezene water in Clark. The obcession with California is funny, our problems come from the local, state, and misguided gop policies. Maybe when the entire state becomes a Super Fund site you might figure it out; I doubt it! "

Ummm wrote on Jan 14, 2009 9:32 PM:

" BLM is quite familiar with the rules and regulations governing use of public lands under their jurisdiction. Perhaps you should investigate how happy their people are, and how many have left the agency, because they cannot seem to hold fast to some of those rules and regulations. "

69Ford wrote on Jan 15, 2009 8:33 AM:

" Hey , Boulder, I have drank the Clark water , there is nothing wrong with it. What is wrong is the cry baby greenies who have infested this state , running from other states they help to skrew up with their phony ideas. And subdivisions and Hummers are a BIG problem in Sublette County , and across Wyoming. Where was all this BS when the last oil boom was going on ? And where were all you snivling greenies at then ? "

LaramieResident wrote on Jan 15, 2009 11:19 AM:

" 69Ford - And what about the native Pinedale people? Who cares where people move from? Real Wyomingites live in Wyoming because of clean air, open spaces, and natural beauty. I am well aware that coal, gas, and oil revenues are the reason why we taxed so low, it also pays my bills. AGAIN, I don't think we should stop drilling. I just want accountability and responsible drilling. When the next bust comes and the energy companies all leave town, who will be left cleaning up their mess? What are the BLM stipulations? The only thing the BLM does is cater to Cheney and the energy companies. If they really go above and beyond, why won't they spend the extra cash to use directional drilling? How do more wells benefit Wyoming when we are getting 30-70% less than the going price for gas because we don't have the pipeline capacity? "

69Ford wrote on Jan 16, 2009 8:21 AM:

" Yeah , well , Laramie , you will no doubt get your wish , as the rigs are stacking out and hands are disappearing. I hope all you snivling greenies are real satisfied when you are paying more for gas & oil , and higher taxes. You all have a really nice day. "

LaramieResident wrote on Jan 16, 2009 10:47 AM:

" 69Ford - So what would you like to see, a free-for-all for Wyoming's resources, drill anywhere and everywhere? Are there any places you would like to see protected? If you lived in Pinedale, you wouldn't have a problem with Ozone warnings due to the extreme amount of drilling nearby? Hasn't Wyoming done their fare share of energy supply for the nation? Our lands are getting raped, while Colorado, Montana, and Utah aren't pulling their weight as far as energy rich states go. Why can't we do it responsibly? I assume you work for an energy company, and don't partake in many outdoor activities in Wyoming. "

Fiercely Independent wrote on Jan 16, 2009 4:13 PM:

" Growing up in a blue collar Wyoming mining family has made me a strong supporter of multiple use and very pro energy development. However, it sickened me to see the density of the drilling taking place - just watch this YouTube video and you'll understand.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=mw1d7zp2vB8

I don't understand why they need the pads so close together. And I love my state, so I'm willing to deviate from my typical stance and acknowledge that these gas developments have gone too far and are not reflective of multiple use that I will support. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.